{"title":"元心理学的功能——对1970 - 1980年代美国一场争论的研究","authors":"M. Batsch","doi":"10.3366/PAH.2021.0369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the controversies triggered by Freud’s metapsychology, specifically the American critiques of the 1970s – Heinz Hartmann, Merton Gill and David Rapaport, Robert Waelder, and Lawrence Kubie for ego-psychology, leading into Roy Schafer, George Klein and again Merton Gill for hermeneutics, Emmanuel Peterfreund and Charles Brenner for positivism, before concluding with a summary of more inventive engagements with","PeriodicalId":42579,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalysis and History","volume":"23 1","pages":"75-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Function of Metapsychology – Study of an American Controversy, 1970s–1980s\",\"authors\":\"M. Batsch\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/PAH.2021.0369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the controversies triggered by Freud’s metapsychology, specifically the American critiques of the 1970s – Heinz Hartmann, Merton Gill and David Rapaport, Robert Waelder, and Lawrence Kubie for ego-psychology, leading into Roy Schafer, George Klein and again Merton Gill for hermeneutics, Emmanuel Peterfreund and Charles Brenner for positivism, before concluding with a summary of more inventive engagements with\",\"PeriodicalId\":42579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychoanalysis and History\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"75-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychoanalysis and History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/PAH.2021.0369\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoanalysis and History","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/PAH.2021.0369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Function of Metapsychology – Study of an American Controversy, 1970s–1980s
This article explores the controversies triggered by Freud’s metapsychology, specifically the American critiques of the 1970s – Heinz Hartmann, Merton Gill and David Rapaport, Robert Waelder, and Lawrence Kubie for ego-psychology, leading into Roy Schafer, George Klein and again Merton Gill for hermeneutics, Emmanuel Peterfreund and Charles Brenner for positivism, before concluding with a summary of more inventive engagements with