在同侧噪声存在下用V波听觉脑干反应的潜伏期偏移评估突触病变

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Auditory and Vestibular Research Pub Date : 2022-12-12 DOI:10.18502/avr.v32i1.11321
Zeynab Sabzinasab, M. Rouzbahani, Reyhane Toufan, Mohammad Maarefvand
{"title":"在同侧噪声存在下用V波听觉脑干反应的潜伏期偏移评估突触病变","authors":"Zeynab Sabzinasab, M. Rouzbahani, Reyhane Toufan, Mohammad Maarefvand","doi":"10.18502/avr.v32i1.11321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Recreational and occupational noise can cause permanent  damage to the inner ear. Cochlear synaptopathy can be “hidden” because this synaptic reduction can occur without permanent hearing threshold changes. Our study aimed to assess synaptopathy in people with and without a history of occupational noise exposure by use of latency shift of wave V with masking. \nMethods: In this study, 38 males were involved. All participants had normal hearing thresholds. Of 38 males, 20-male identified with exposure to occupational noise and 18 identified without occupational noise exposure. Auditory brainstem response and masked were performed. \nResults: The main effect of the between-group factor was not significant in the right and left ears. But the main effect of the within-group factor in the right and left ears were significant (p<0.001 and p<0.001). Auditory brainstem response latencies at different levels in each group were significant. These results showed that there were no significant differences between latency changes in both groups. \nConclusion: In order to diagnose cochlear synaptopathy in humans it is important to use audiological test batteries in the future. There is currently no effective way to diagnose noise- induced cochlear synaptopathy in human subjects. \nKeywords: Noise induce cochlear synaptopathy; auditory brainstem response; cochlear synaptopathy; hidden hearing loss","PeriodicalId":34089,"journal":{"name":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Synaptopathy by Use of Latency Shift of Wave V Auditory Brainstem Response in the Presence of Ipsilateral Noise\",\"authors\":\"Zeynab Sabzinasab, M. Rouzbahani, Reyhane Toufan, Mohammad Maarefvand\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/avr.v32i1.11321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: Recreational and occupational noise can cause permanent  damage to the inner ear. Cochlear synaptopathy can be “hidden” because this synaptic reduction can occur without permanent hearing threshold changes. Our study aimed to assess synaptopathy in people with and without a history of occupational noise exposure by use of latency shift of wave V with masking. \\nMethods: In this study, 38 males were involved. All participants had normal hearing thresholds. Of 38 males, 20-male identified with exposure to occupational noise and 18 identified without occupational noise exposure. Auditory brainstem response and masked were performed. \\nResults: The main effect of the between-group factor was not significant in the right and left ears. But the main effect of the within-group factor in the right and left ears were significant (p<0.001 and p<0.001). Auditory brainstem response latencies at different levels in each group were significant. These results showed that there were no significant differences between latency changes in both groups. \\nConclusion: In order to diagnose cochlear synaptopathy in humans it is important to use audiological test batteries in the future. There is currently no effective way to diagnose noise- induced cochlear synaptopathy in human subjects. \\nKeywords: Noise induce cochlear synaptopathy; auditory brainstem response; cochlear synaptopathy; hidden hearing loss\",\"PeriodicalId\":34089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditory and Vestibular Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditory and Vestibular Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v32i1.11321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v32i1.11321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:娱乐和职业噪音会对内耳造成永久性损伤。耳蜗突触病变可以被“隐藏”,因为这种突触减少可以在没有永久性听力阈值变化的情况下发生。我们的研究旨在通过使用带掩蔽的V波潜伏期偏移来评估有和没有职业噪声暴露史的人的突触症。方法:本研究共涉及38名男性。所有参与者的听力阈值均正常。在38名男性中,20名男性被确定接触过职业噪声,18名未被确定接触职业噪声。进行听觉脑干反应和掩蔽。结果:组间因素对左右耳的主要影响不显著。但组内因素在左右耳的主要影响是显著的(p<0.001和p<0.001)。各组不同水平的听性脑干反应潜伏期是显著的。这些结果表明,两组的潜伏期变化没有显著差异。结论:为了诊断人类耳蜗突触性疾病,在未来使用听力测试电池是很重要的。目前还没有有效的方法来诊断噪声诱导的人类耳蜗突触症。关键词:噪声诱发耳蜗突触症;听觉脑干反应;耳蜗突触症;隐性听力损失
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Synaptopathy by Use of Latency Shift of Wave V Auditory Brainstem Response in the Presence of Ipsilateral Noise
Background and Aim: Recreational and occupational noise can cause permanent  damage to the inner ear. Cochlear synaptopathy can be “hidden” because this synaptic reduction can occur without permanent hearing threshold changes. Our study aimed to assess synaptopathy in people with and without a history of occupational noise exposure by use of latency shift of wave V with masking. Methods: In this study, 38 males were involved. All participants had normal hearing thresholds. Of 38 males, 20-male identified with exposure to occupational noise and 18 identified without occupational noise exposure. Auditory brainstem response and masked were performed. Results: The main effect of the between-group factor was not significant in the right and left ears. But the main effect of the within-group factor in the right and left ears were significant (p<0.001 and p<0.001). Auditory brainstem response latencies at different levels in each group were significant. These results showed that there were no significant differences between latency changes in both groups. Conclusion: In order to diagnose cochlear synaptopathy in humans it is important to use audiological test batteries in the future. There is currently no effective way to diagnose noise- induced cochlear synaptopathy in human subjects. Keywords: Noise induce cochlear synaptopathy; auditory brainstem response; cochlear synaptopathy; hidden hearing loss
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Auditory and Vestibular Research
Auditory and Vestibular Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Characteristics and Hearing Aid Uptake Rate of Patients Seen at the Community Hearing Clinic: A Model of Upstream Preventive Care and Earlier Intervention The Use of Homotonic Monosyllabic Words in the Persian Language for the Word-in-Noise Perception Test Development of a Smart Game Application for Auditory Training of Children with Spatial Processing Disorder in Iran: A Pilot Study Investigating the Effect of Persian Phonemic Synthesis Program in Cochlear Implant Users with Phoneme Processing Dificulities Effect of Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy on the Daily Life Aspects of Military Men with Persistent Postural- Perceptual Dizziness: A Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1