基于机器学习的测试作弊检测分析

IF 2.7 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI:10.1111/emip.12541
Huijuan Meng, Ye Ma
{"title":"基于机器学习的测试作弊检测分析","authors":"Huijuan Meng,&nbsp;Ye Ma","doi":"10.1111/emip.12541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, machine learning (ML) techniques have received more attention in detecting aberrant test-taking behaviors due to advantages when compared to traditional data forensics methods. However, defining “True Test Cheaters” is challenging—different than other fraud detection tasks such as flagging forged bank checks or credit card frauds, testing organizations are often lack of physical evidences to identify “True Test Cheaters” to train ML models. This study proposed a statistically defensible method of labeling “True Test Cheaters” in the data, demonstrated the effectiveness of using ML approaches to identify irregular statistical patterns in exam data, and established an analytical framework for evaluating and conducting real-time ML-based test data forensics. Classification accuracy and false negative/positive results are evaluated across different supervised-ML techniques. The reliability and feasibility of operationally using this approach for an IT certification exam are evaluated using real data.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning–Based Profiling in Test Cheating Detection\",\"authors\":\"Huijuan Meng,&nbsp;Ye Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emip.12541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In recent years, machine learning (ML) techniques have received more attention in detecting aberrant test-taking behaviors due to advantages when compared to traditional data forensics methods. However, defining “True Test Cheaters” is challenging—different than other fraud detection tasks such as flagging forged bank checks or credit card frauds, testing organizations are often lack of physical evidences to identify “True Test Cheaters” to train ML models. This study proposed a statistically defensible method of labeling “True Test Cheaters” in the data, demonstrated the effectiveness of using ML approaches to identify irregular statistical patterns in exam data, and established an analytical framework for evaluating and conducting real-time ML-based test data forensics. Classification accuracy and false negative/positive results are evaluated across different supervised-ML techniques. The reliability and feasibility of operationally using this approach for an IT certification exam are evaluated using real data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12541\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,机器学习(ML)技术由于其与传统数据取证方法相比的优势,在检测异常考试行为方面受到越来越多的关注。然而,定义“真正的测试作弊者”是具有挑战性的——与其他欺诈检测任务(如标记伪造的银行支票或信用卡欺诈)不同,测试组织通常缺乏物理证据来识别“真正的测试作弊者”来训练机器学习模型。本研究提出了一种在数据中标记“真正的考试作弊者”的统计方法,证明了使用ML方法识别考试数据中不规则统计模式的有效性,并建立了一个评估和开展基于ML的实时考试数据取证的分析框架。在不同的监督ml技术中评估分类准确性和假阴性/阳性结果。使用实际数据评估了在IT认证考试中使用这种方法的可靠性和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine Learning–Based Profiling in Test Cheating Detection

In recent years, machine learning (ML) techniques have received more attention in detecting aberrant test-taking behaviors due to advantages when compared to traditional data forensics methods. However, defining “True Test Cheaters” is challenging—different than other fraud detection tasks such as flagging forged bank checks or credit card frauds, testing organizations are often lack of physical evidences to identify “True Test Cheaters” to train ML models. This study proposed a statistically defensible method of labeling “True Test Cheaters” in the data, demonstrated the effectiveness of using ML approaches to identify irregular statistical patterns in exam data, and established an analytical framework for evaluating and conducting real-time ML-based test data forensics. Classification accuracy and false negative/positive results are evaluated across different supervised-ML techniques. The reliability and feasibility of operationally using this approach for an IT certification exam are evaluated using real data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
The Past, Present, and Future of Large‐Scale Assessment Consortia Commentary: Where Does Classroom Assessment Fit in Educational Measurement? Commentary: A Data‐Driven Analysis of Recent Job Posts to Evaluate the Foundational Competencies Commentary: Past, Present, and Future of Educational Measurement Commentary: How Research and Testing Companies can Support Early‐Career Measurement Professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1