民族主义还是爱国主义?虚假困境的修辞成因

Henrique Jales Ribeiro
{"title":"民族主义还是爱国主义?虚假困境的修辞成因","authors":"Henrique Jales Ribeiro","doi":"10.14195/0872-0851_62_2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting from a recent ideological and political controversy regarding the devaluation of the concept of “nationalism” in relation to that of ‘patriotism”, the author – following his own years-long investigations on the subject – historically and philosophically reframes each of these concepts from the perspective of rhetoric and argumentation. It is shown, in this context, that the arguments in question are fallacious (and even, in some applications, clearly perverse) and a radical and provocative reformulation of the aforementioned concepts and the controversy involved is proposed – a reformulation which, eventually and at best, may give rise to a new historiography on the subject.","PeriodicalId":52758,"journal":{"name":"Revista Filosofica de Coimbra","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationalism or patriotism? The rhetorical genesis of a false dilemma\",\"authors\":\"Henrique Jales Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.14195/0872-0851_62_2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Starting from a recent ideological and political controversy regarding the devaluation of the concept of “nationalism” in relation to that of ‘patriotism”, the author – following his own years-long investigations on the subject – historically and philosophically reframes each of these concepts from the perspective of rhetoric and argumentation. It is shown, in this context, that the arguments in question are fallacious (and even, in some applications, clearly perverse) and a radical and provocative reformulation of the aforementioned concepts and the controversy involved is proposed – a reformulation which, eventually and at best, may give rise to a new historiography on the subject.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Filosofica de Coimbra\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Filosofica de Coimbra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14195/0872-0851_62_2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Filosofica de Coimbra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14195/0872-0851_62_2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从最近关于“民族主义”概念相对于“爱国主义”概念贬值的意识形态和政治争议开始,作者根据自己对该主题长达数年的调查,从修辞和论证的角度从历史和哲学上重新构建了这些概念。这表明,在这种情况下,所讨论的论点是谬误的(甚至,在某些应用中,显然是反常的),并提出了对上述概念和所涉及的争议进行激进和挑衅性的重新表述-这种重新表述最终或充其量可能会产生关于该主题的新史学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nationalism or patriotism? The rhetorical genesis of a false dilemma
Starting from a recent ideological and political controversy regarding the devaluation of the concept of “nationalism” in relation to that of ‘patriotism”, the author – following his own years-long investigations on the subject – historically and philosophically reframes each of these concepts from the perspective of rhetoric and argumentation. It is shown, in this context, that the arguments in question are fallacious (and even, in some applications, clearly perverse) and a radical and provocative reformulation of the aforementioned concepts and the controversy involved is proposed – a reformulation which, eventually and at best, may give rise to a new historiography on the subject.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
O real — no conhecimento A excepção Derrida – O “eleito secreto” dos animais A veia onto-antropo-teo-lógica em questão Ricoeur between Ithaca and the isle of the Phaecians Petrus de Alvernia, Quaestiones Super I‑VIII Libros Politicorum. A Critical Edition and Study by Marco Toste, (Leuven/Louvain: Leuven University Press, Ancient and Medieval Philosophy Series 1: LXI, 2022). ISBN: 978-94-6270-318-6. 902 pp. Jean-Paul Coujou, Suárez dans l’Histoire de la Métaphysique. Volume 1: L’Héritage et le débat contemporain, (Collection Carte Blanche), (Toulouse: Entremises Éditions, 2022). ISBN: 978-2-38255-037-3. 237 pp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1