电波属于人民:对津巴布韦无线电广播和许可的批判性分析

Last Alfandika, Gift Gwindingwe
{"title":"电波属于人民:对津巴布韦无线电广播和许可的批判性分析","authors":"Last Alfandika, Gift Gwindingwe","doi":"10.1080/02500167.2020.1796729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reports on a study that focused on the radio broadcasting and licensing scene in Zimbabwe between 2000 and 2020. The study interrogated the sincerity of the Zimbabwean government in advancing both media pluralism and diversity. Opposition political parties and civic organisations pressured Zimbabwe into adopting a liberal approach that they hoped would widen the political and media space. The study examined how the government has taken and implemented such a liberal approach. Drawing on the competitive authoritarianism concept, the study argued that the cosmetic application of contested and undemocratic media laws that pretended to be democratising the media was indeed gagging democracy. This is called a pseudo-progressive stance. The study gathered data using qualitative interviews with three media activists, three policymakers, two media professionals, and two media scholars in Zimbabwe. In total, 10 qualitative key informant in-depth interviews were carried out. The analysis revealed a silhouette of grandiose but empty media laws that have continued to impede democracy in Zimbabwe. Therefore, the study concluded that the monopoly of media influence and concentration of broadcasting media ownership within the ruling party is dire and not conducive to the development of diverse and creative content for the nation. Thus, collaborative efforts are needed for real change to be achieved in the broadcasting media in Zimbabwe.","PeriodicalId":44378,"journal":{"name":"Communicatio-South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research","volume":"47 1","pages":"44 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02500167.2020.1796729","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Airwaves Belong to the People: A Critical Analysis of Radio Broadcasting and Licensing in Zimbabwe\",\"authors\":\"Last Alfandika, Gift Gwindingwe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02500167.2020.1796729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article reports on a study that focused on the radio broadcasting and licensing scene in Zimbabwe between 2000 and 2020. The study interrogated the sincerity of the Zimbabwean government in advancing both media pluralism and diversity. Opposition political parties and civic organisations pressured Zimbabwe into adopting a liberal approach that they hoped would widen the political and media space. The study examined how the government has taken and implemented such a liberal approach. Drawing on the competitive authoritarianism concept, the study argued that the cosmetic application of contested and undemocratic media laws that pretended to be democratising the media was indeed gagging democracy. This is called a pseudo-progressive stance. The study gathered data using qualitative interviews with three media activists, three policymakers, two media professionals, and two media scholars in Zimbabwe. In total, 10 qualitative key informant in-depth interviews were carried out. The analysis revealed a silhouette of grandiose but empty media laws that have continued to impede democracy in Zimbabwe. Therefore, the study concluded that the monopoly of media influence and concentration of broadcasting media ownership within the ruling party is dire and not conducive to the development of diverse and creative content for the nation. Thus, collaborative efforts are needed for real change to be achieved in the broadcasting media in Zimbabwe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communicatio-South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"44 - 60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02500167.2020.1796729\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communicatio-South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2020.1796729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicatio-South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2020.1796729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文报告了一项研究,重点研究了2000年至2020年间津巴布韦的无线电广播和许可情况。这项研究质疑了津巴布韦政府在推进媒体多元化和多样性方面的诚意。反对党和民间组织向津巴布韦施加压力,迫使其采取一种自由的方式,他们希望这种方式能扩大政治和媒体空间。这项研究调查了政府是如何采取和实施这种自由的方法的。根据竞争性威权主义的概念,该研究认为,表面上应用有争议的、不民主的媒体法律,假装使媒体民主化,实际上是在扼杀民主。这被称为伪进步立场。本研究通过对津巴布韦的三名媒体活动家、三名政策制定者、两名媒体专业人士和两名媒体学者进行定性访谈来收集数据。总共进行了10次定性关键信息提供者深度访谈。分析揭示了一些浮夸但空洞的媒体法律的轮廓,这些法律继续阻碍着津巴布韦的民主。因此,该研究得出的结论是,媒体影响力的垄断和广播媒体所有权集中在执政党内部是可怕的,不利于为国家发展多样化和创造性的内容。因此,要在津巴布韦的广播媒体中实现真正的变革,就需要进行合作努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Airwaves Belong to the People: A Critical Analysis of Radio Broadcasting and Licensing in Zimbabwe
Abstract This article reports on a study that focused on the radio broadcasting and licensing scene in Zimbabwe between 2000 and 2020. The study interrogated the sincerity of the Zimbabwean government in advancing both media pluralism and diversity. Opposition political parties and civic organisations pressured Zimbabwe into adopting a liberal approach that they hoped would widen the political and media space. The study examined how the government has taken and implemented such a liberal approach. Drawing on the competitive authoritarianism concept, the study argued that the cosmetic application of contested and undemocratic media laws that pretended to be democratising the media was indeed gagging democracy. This is called a pseudo-progressive stance. The study gathered data using qualitative interviews with three media activists, three policymakers, two media professionals, and two media scholars in Zimbabwe. In total, 10 qualitative key informant in-depth interviews were carried out. The analysis revealed a silhouette of grandiose but empty media laws that have continued to impede democracy in Zimbabwe. Therefore, the study concluded that the monopoly of media influence and concentration of broadcasting media ownership within the ruling party is dire and not conducive to the development of diverse and creative content for the nation. Thus, collaborative efforts are needed for real change to be achieved in the broadcasting media in Zimbabwe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
An Analytical Lens Resting on a Tripod: De-Westernising, Internationalising, and Decolonising International Communication TV and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study of the Television Platform Consumption Choices of Millennials in Gauteng during a Pandemic Internet Shutdown and Regime-Imposed Disinformation Campaigns Media Discourse, Legal, and Ethical Issues Arising from the Zuma Saga and Nkandlagate The Media Decolonial Theory: Re-theorising and Rupturing Euro-American Canons for South African Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1