宫腔镜子宫内膜切除术与Mirena治疗排卵障碍围绝经期异常子宫出血的可重复性

Y. Sultan, S. Daoud
{"title":"宫腔镜子宫内膜切除术与Mirena治疗排卵障碍围绝经期异常子宫出血的可重复性","authors":"Y. Sultan, S. Daoud","doi":"10.31579/2642-9756/122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy of local levonorgestrel intrauterine releasing system and transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCER) in the management of perimenopausal dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Patients and Methods: This study was done at Ain Shams and Al-Azhar University Maternity Hospitals during a period started from January 2019 to January 2021. Patients were followed up at the outpatient gynaecology clinics at regular schedules (3, 6 and 12 months) for one year duration. Perimenopausal patients with DUB were assigned randomly to either the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (n = 35) or endometrial resection (n = 45). Blood loss assessment charts were used to measure menstrual blood loss. Results: Total bleeding score/month decreased from a baseline median of 47.26 to 33.5 (P<0.01) for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and from 47.13 to 33.9 (P<0.01) for transcervical resection of the endometrium. There was no statically difference in bleeding score before and during treatment between the two groups of women. Conclusion: Both treatments levonorgestrel intrauterine system and transcervical resection of the endometrium efficiently reduced menstrual bleeding. levonorgestrel intrauterine system should be considered the first-line treatment for idiopathic menorrhagia because it is easy to insert, has a sustained effect, provides contraception, may reduce the need for surgery, and is cost-effective and well tolerated.","PeriodicalId":93058,"journal":{"name":"Women health care and issues","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reproducibility of Treatment of Perimenopausal Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Due to Ovulatory Dysfunction with Hysteroscopic Endometrial Resection versus Mirena\",\"authors\":\"Y. Sultan, S. Daoud\",\"doi\":\"10.31579/2642-9756/122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the efficacy of local levonorgestrel intrauterine releasing system and transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCER) in the management of perimenopausal dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Patients and Methods: This study was done at Ain Shams and Al-Azhar University Maternity Hospitals during a period started from January 2019 to January 2021. Patients were followed up at the outpatient gynaecology clinics at regular schedules (3, 6 and 12 months) for one year duration. Perimenopausal patients with DUB were assigned randomly to either the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (n = 35) or endometrial resection (n = 45). Blood loss assessment charts were used to measure menstrual blood loss. Results: Total bleeding score/month decreased from a baseline median of 47.26 to 33.5 (P<0.01) for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and from 47.13 to 33.9 (P<0.01) for transcervical resection of the endometrium. There was no statically difference in bleeding score before and during treatment between the two groups of women. Conclusion: Both treatments levonorgestrel intrauterine system and transcervical resection of the endometrium efficiently reduced menstrual bleeding. levonorgestrel intrauterine system should be considered the first-line treatment for idiopathic menorrhagia because it is easy to insert, has a sustained effect, provides contraception, may reduce the need for surgery, and is cost-effective and well tolerated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women health care and issues\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women health care and issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women health care and issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较局部左炔诺孕酮宫内释放系统与经宫颈子宫内膜切除术(TCER)治疗围绝经期功能失调性子宫出血的疗效。患者和方法:本研究于2019年1月至2021年1月在艾因沙姆斯和爱资哈尔大学妇产医院进行。患者定期在妇科门诊(3、6和12个月)随访一年。围绝经期DUB患者被随机分配到左炔诺孕酮宫内系统组(n = 35)或子宫内膜切除术组(n = 45)。出血量评估表用于测定月经出血量。结果:总出血评分/月从基线中位数47.26降至33.5 (P<0.01),经宫颈子宫内膜切除术从47.13降至33.9 (P<0.01)。两组妇女在治疗前和治疗期间的出血评分无统计学差异。结论:左炔诺孕酮宫内系统治疗和经宫颈子宫内膜切除术均能有效减少月经出血。左炔诺孕酮宫内系统应被认为是特发性月经过多的一线治疗方法,因为它易于植入,有持续的效果,提供避孕,可能减少手术的需要,成本效益好,耐受性好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Reproducibility of Treatment of Perimenopausal Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Due to Ovulatory Dysfunction with Hysteroscopic Endometrial Resection versus Mirena
Objective: To compare the efficacy of local levonorgestrel intrauterine releasing system and transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCER) in the management of perimenopausal dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Patients and Methods: This study was done at Ain Shams and Al-Azhar University Maternity Hospitals during a period started from January 2019 to January 2021. Patients were followed up at the outpatient gynaecology clinics at regular schedules (3, 6 and 12 months) for one year duration. Perimenopausal patients with DUB were assigned randomly to either the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (n = 35) or endometrial resection (n = 45). Blood loss assessment charts were used to measure menstrual blood loss. Results: Total bleeding score/month decreased from a baseline median of 47.26 to 33.5 (P<0.01) for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and from 47.13 to 33.9 (P<0.01) for transcervical resection of the endometrium. There was no statically difference in bleeding score before and during treatment between the two groups of women. Conclusion: Both treatments levonorgestrel intrauterine system and transcervical resection of the endometrium efficiently reduced menstrual bleeding. levonorgestrel intrauterine system should be considered the first-line treatment for idiopathic menorrhagia because it is easy to insert, has a sustained effect, provides contraception, may reduce the need for surgery, and is cost-effective and well tolerated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Series of Septic Abortion During Covid-19 Pandemic at A Tertiary Care Centre in New Delhi, India Gonococcal Pelvic Inflammatory Disease with Sepsis Criteria: Review of 2 Cases Restoration Treatment for Female Patients with Non-Bearing Pregnancy at the Early Terms of Gestation Cutaneous Metastsis of An Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma to The Face Efficacy Of Progestins in The Treatment of Functional Ovarian Cyst
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1