谢尔盖·洛兹尼察的《奥斯特利茨》(2016)中的肖自拍、肖自拍羞辱和社会摄影

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies Pub Date : 2021-08-30 DOI:10.1353/sho.2021.0027
Daniel H. Magilow
{"title":"谢尔盖·洛兹尼察的《奥斯特利茨》(2016)中的肖自拍、肖自拍羞辱和社会摄影","authors":"Daniel H. Magilow","doi":"10.1353/sho.2021.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:In the age of social media, controversy has regularly erupted when tourists post inappropriate photographs of themselves at Holocaust memorial sites to their social media feeds. These \"Shoah selfies\" subsequently trigger vitriolic online shaming when outraged, self-appointed defenders of Holocaust memory accuse selfie-takers of desecrating the memory of the dead. But while these images are usually dismissed as evidence of bad taste and a crisis of Holocaust memory among younger generations, this paper argues that both Shoah selfies and Shoah selfie shaming fulfill other, more nuanced functions. Through a reading of Ukrainian filmmaker Sergei Losnitza's 2016 observational documentary Austerlitz, which depicts how tourists behave and photograph on a typical summer afternoon at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp, I argue that however offensive they may be, Shoah selfies must be understood as examples of \"social photographs.\" In media theorist Nathan Jurgenson's definition, a \"social photograph\" is a digital image whose \"existence as a stand-alone media object is subordinate to its existence as a unit of communication.\" Within social media streams, they contribute to the photographer's ongoing narrative of self-fashioning. They also typify the rise of what Diana Popescu terms \"post-witnessing,\" the urge to \"investigate the past by undertaking a real and not only an imaginary journey of discovery\" at Holocaust sites. As Shoah selfies show how new media have effected tremendous shifts in Holocaust memory, the overrepresentation of young women and effeminate men as targets of shaming show how this response to offensive Holocaust photography concurrently sustains oppressive gender hierarchies.","PeriodicalId":21809,"journal":{"name":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","volume":"39 1","pages":"155 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shoah Selfies, Shoah Selfie Shaming, and Social Photography in Sergei Loznitsa's Austerlitz (2016)\",\"authors\":\"Daniel H. Magilow\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sho.2021.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:In the age of social media, controversy has regularly erupted when tourists post inappropriate photographs of themselves at Holocaust memorial sites to their social media feeds. These \\\"Shoah selfies\\\" subsequently trigger vitriolic online shaming when outraged, self-appointed defenders of Holocaust memory accuse selfie-takers of desecrating the memory of the dead. But while these images are usually dismissed as evidence of bad taste and a crisis of Holocaust memory among younger generations, this paper argues that both Shoah selfies and Shoah selfie shaming fulfill other, more nuanced functions. Through a reading of Ukrainian filmmaker Sergei Losnitza's 2016 observational documentary Austerlitz, which depicts how tourists behave and photograph on a typical summer afternoon at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp, I argue that however offensive they may be, Shoah selfies must be understood as examples of \\\"social photographs.\\\" In media theorist Nathan Jurgenson's definition, a \\\"social photograph\\\" is a digital image whose \\\"existence as a stand-alone media object is subordinate to its existence as a unit of communication.\\\" Within social media streams, they contribute to the photographer's ongoing narrative of self-fashioning. They also typify the rise of what Diana Popescu terms \\\"post-witnessing,\\\" the urge to \\\"investigate the past by undertaking a real and not only an imaginary journey of discovery\\\" at Holocaust sites. As Shoah selfies show how new media have effected tremendous shifts in Holocaust memory, the overrepresentation of young women and effeminate men as targets of shaming show how this response to offensive Holocaust photography concurrently sustains oppressive gender hierarchies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"155 - 187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.2021.0027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.2021.0027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:在社交媒体时代,当游客在大屠杀纪念馆上传自己的不当照片时,经常会引发争议。这些“大屠杀自拍”随后在网上引发了刻薄的羞辱,那些自封为大屠杀记忆捍卫者的人愤怒地指责自拍者亵渎了对死者的记忆。但是,尽管这些照片通常被认为是年轻一代不良品味和大屠杀记忆危机的证据,但本文认为,大屠杀自拍和大屠杀自拍羞耻都有其他更微妙的功能。乌克兰电影制作人谢尔盖·洛斯尼察(Sergei Losnitza) 2016年拍摄的观察性纪录片《奥斯特里茨》(Austerlitz)描述了游客在萨克森豪森集中营(Sachsenhausen集中营)一个典型的夏日下午的行为和拍照方式。通过阅读这部纪录片,我认为,无论这些自拍多么令人反感,都必须被理解为“社交照片”的例子。在媒体理论家Nathan Jurgenson的定义中,“社交照片”是一种数字图像,其“作为独立媒体对象的存在服从于其作为传播单位的存在”。在社交媒体流中,它们为摄影师持续的自我塑造叙事做出了贡献。它们也代表了戴安娜·波佩斯库(Diana Popescu)所说的“后目击”(post-witness)的兴起,即在大屠杀遗址“通过进行真实而不仅仅是想象的发现之旅来调查过去”的冲动。大屠杀自拍显示了新媒体如何影响了大屠杀记忆的巨大变化,年轻女性和柔弱男性成为羞辱对象的比例过高,表明这种对令人反感的大屠杀摄影的反应同时维持了压迫性的性别等级制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shoah Selfies, Shoah Selfie Shaming, and Social Photography in Sergei Loznitsa's Austerlitz (2016)
ABSTRACT:In the age of social media, controversy has regularly erupted when tourists post inappropriate photographs of themselves at Holocaust memorial sites to their social media feeds. These "Shoah selfies" subsequently trigger vitriolic online shaming when outraged, self-appointed defenders of Holocaust memory accuse selfie-takers of desecrating the memory of the dead. But while these images are usually dismissed as evidence of bad taste and a crisis of Holocaust memory among younger generations, this paper argues that both Shoah selfies and Shoah selfie shaming fulfill other, more nuanced functions. Through a reading of Ukrainian filmmaker Sergei Losnitza's 2016 observational documentary Austerlitz, which depicts how tourists behave and photograph on a typical summer afternoon at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp, I argue that however offensive they may be, Shoah selfies must be understood as examples of "social photographs." In media theorist Nathan Jurgenson's definition, a "social photograph" is a digital image whose "existence as a stand-alone media object is subordinate to its existence as a unit of communication." Within social media streams, they contribute to the photographer's ongoing narrative of self-fashioning. They also typify the rise of what Diana Popescu terms "post-witnessing," the urge to "investigate the past by undertaking a real and not only an imaginary journey of discovery" at Holocaust sites. As Shoah selfies show how new media have effected tremendous shifts in Holocaust memory, the overrepresentation of young women and effeminate men as targets of shaming show how this response to offensive Holocaust photography concurrently sustains oppressive gender hierarchies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Ladin in Lineage: Through the Doors of Jewish Gendered Life at Yeshiva University's Stern College for Women Un-Settled Questions: Frontier Logic and Satmar Political Theology A Specter Haunting Holocaust Studies: The Muselmann Did Jews Die as Muslims in Auschwitz? Specters of the Muselmann Transmatriation? Avishag the Shunammite in Three Contemporary Israeli Novels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1