生殖

Étienne Balibar, David S. Broder
{"title":"生殖","authors":"Étienne Balibar, David S. Broder","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2022.2051389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a counterpart to the discussion of recent theories of “social reproduction” and their confrontation with the Marxian critique of political economy, this essay develops a genealogy of the concept of “reproduction” itself, from a semantic and historical point of view. Observing the intersection of problems coming from the realm of natural history and from classical political economy, which involve three different significations (remaining invariant despite displacements in their uses) and which we identify by means of the classical categories of mimesis (reproduction of a model), genesis (continuation of life), and poiesis (restoration of a stock), the essay is consequently able to compare strategies of crisis resolution and to reconstruct an imaginary of revolution based on mutation and interruption.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproductions\",\"authors\":\"Étienne Balibar, David S. Broder\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08935696.2022.2051389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a counterpart to the discussion of recent theories of “social reproduction” and their confrontation with the Marxian critique of political economy, this essay develops a genealogy of the concept of “reproduction” itself, from a semantic and historical point of view. Observing the intersection of problems coming from the realm of natural history and from classical political economy, which involve three different significations (remaining invariant despite displacements in their uses) and which we identify by means of the classical categories of mimesis (reproduction of a model), genesis (continuation of life), and poiesis (restoration of a stock), the essay is consequently able to compare strategies of crisis resolution and to reconstruct an imaginary of revolution based on mutation and interruption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2051389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2051389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作为对近期“社会再生产”理论的讨论及其与马克思主义政治经济学批判的对抗,本文从语义和历史的角度,对“再生产”概念本身进行了谱系分析。观察来自自然史领域和古典政治经济学的问题的交叉点,这些问题涉及三种不同的意义(尽管在使用中发生了变化,但仍然保持不变),我们通过模仿(模型的复制)、起源(生命的延续)和poiesis(股票的恢复)的经典类别来识别这些意义,因此,本文能够比较危机解决策略,并重建基于突变和中断的革命想象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reproductions
As a counterpart to the discussion of recent theories of “social reproduction” and their confrontation with the Marxian critique of political economy, this essay develops a genealogy of the concept of “reproduction” itself, from a semantic and historical point of view. Observing the intersection of problems coming from the realm of natural history and from classical political economy, which involve three different significations (remaining invariant despite displacements in their uses) and which we identify by means of the classical categories of mimesis (reproduction of a model), genesis (continuation of life), and poiesis (restoration of a stock), the essay is consequently able to compare strategies of crisis resolution and to reconstruct an imaginary of revolution based on mutation and interruption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The Vulgar (in) Marxism: Vacillating between Exchange and Production Toward a Vulgar Transgender Marxism Vulgar, Crude, Foolish: Brecht, Teaching, Fascism Airbrushing Out Revolutionary Social Democracy: Lenin, Stalin, and Potresov on the Second International Editors’ Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1