外伤性脑损伤患者坚持床头抬高:一项审计

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1758749
Pragnitha Chitteti, Ajish Sam George, Shalini Nair, Reka Karuppasamy, M. Joseph
{"title":"外伤性脑损伤患者坚持床头抬高:一项审计","authors":"Pragnitha Chitteti, Ajish Sam George, Shalini Nair, Reka Karuppasamy, M. Joseph","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1758749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  An important factor affecting the outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the early management of raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Head-of-bed elevation (HBE) is a simple and effective method to reduce ICP and prevent aspiration in head injury. Methods  This audit was carried out in a level one trauma center. All adult TBI patients were included in the study except patients who had relative contraindication to HBE, managed in prone or Trendelenburg position or who were able to be seated themselves. Patients were observed twice daily, to check adherence to HBE. Adequate HBE angle was referred as an angle of 20 to 30 degrees. A digital protractor was used to measure the head-end angle. Following the first audit cycle, after discussion with nursing staff, a bedside checklist was formulated and two postintervention audit cycles were carried out. Results  The first cycle showed that 40.35% of patients had inadequate HBE. Following implementation of the checklist, this percentage dropped to 11.27 and 7.5% in the second and third cycles, respectively. Agitation ( p -value = 0.038) and Glasgow coma scale at admission ( p -value = 0.028) were found to be confounders for adherence to HBE. Conclusion  Agitation among mild and moderate TBI patients contributed to noncompliance for HBE. There was an increasing trend in adherence to maintaining adequate HBE following the use of a bedside checklist. Sustainability of improvement was confirmed with third audit cycle.","PeriodicalId":16574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to Head-of-Bed Elevation in Traumatic Brain Injury: An Audit\",\"authors\":\"Pragnitha Chitteti, Ajish Sam George, Shalini Nair, Reka Karuppasamy, M. Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1758749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background  An important factor affecting the outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the early management of raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Head-of-bed elevation (HBE) is a simple and effective method to reduce ICP and prevent aspiration in head injury. Methods  This audit was carried out in a level one trauma center. All adult TBI patients were included in the study except patients who had relative contraindication to HBE, managed in prone or Trendelenburg position or who were able to be seated themselves. Patients were observed twice daily, to check adherence to HBE. Adequate HBE angle was referred as an angle of 20 to 30 degrees. A digital protractor was used to measure the head-end angle. Following the first audit cycle, after discussion with nursing staff, a bedside checklist was formulated and two postintervention audit cycles were carried out. Results  The first cycle showed that 40.35% of patients had inadequate HBE. Following implementation of the checklist, this percentage dropped to 11.27 and 7.5% in the second and third cycles, respectively. Agitation ( p -value = 0.038) and Glasgow coma scale at admission ( p -value = 0.028) were found to be confounders for adherence to HBE. Conclusion  Agitation among mild and moderate TBI patients contributed to noncompliance for HBE. There was an increasing trend in adherence to maintaining adequate HBE following the use of a bedside checklist. Sustainability of improvement was confirmed with third audit cycle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要背景 影响创伤性脑损伤(TBI)预后的一个重要因素是颅内压升高(ICP)的早期处理。床头抬高(HBE)是一种简单有效的降低ICP和防止头部损伤误吸的方法。方法 这项审计是在一级创伤中心进行的。除了对HBE有相对禁忌症、俯卧位或特伦德伦堡位或能够自己坐着的患者外,所有成年TBI患者都被纳入研究。患者每天观察两次,以检查HBE的依从性。适当的HBE角度被称为20到30的角度 度。使用数字量角器测量头端角度。在第一个审计周期之后,在与护理人员讨论后,制定了床边检查表,并进行了两个干预后审计周期。后果 第一个周期显示40.35%的患者HBE不足。检查表实施后,这一比例在第二和第三周期分别降至11.27%和7.5%。搅拌(p值 = 0.038)和入院时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(p值 = 0.028)是HBE依从性的混杂因素。结论 轻度和中度TBI患者的激动导致HBE的不依从性。在使用床边检查表后,坚持保持足够的HBE的趋势越来越明显。第三个审计周期确认了改进的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adherence to Head-of-Bed Elevation in Traumatic Brain Injury: An Audit
Abstract Background  An important factor affecting the outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the early management of raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Head-of-bed elevation (HBE) is a simple and effective method to reduce ICP and prevent aspiration in head injury. Methods  This audit was carried out in a level one trauma center. All adult TBI patients were included in the study except patients who had relative contraindication to HBE, managed in prone or Trendelenburg position or who were able to be seated themselves. Patients were observed twice daily, to check adherence to HBE. Adequate HBE angle was referred as an angle of 20 to 30 degrees. A digital protractor was used to measure the head-end angle. Following the first audit cycle, after discussion with nursing staff, a bedside checklist was formulated and two postintervention audit cycles were carried out. Results  The first cycle showed that 40.35% of patients had inadequate HBE. Following implementation of the checklist, this percentage dropped to 11.27 and 7.5% in the second and third cycles, respectively. Agitation ( p -value = 0.038) and Glasgow coma scale at admission ( p -value = 0.028) were found to be confounders for adherence to HBE. Conclusion  Agitation among mild and moderate TBI patients contributed to noncompliance for HBE. There was an increasing trend in adherence to maintaining adequate HBE following the use of a bedside checklist. Sustainability of improvement was confirmed with third audit cycle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care
Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anesthetic Challenges in Hirayama Disease Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery—A Case Series Management and Outcomes of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Associated with Vasospasm Post Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the National Neurosurgical Center in Ireland Chronic Epidural Hematoma in an Elderly Patient: A Rare Encounter!! The Emerging Role of Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) Technique and C-MAC Videolaryngoscope for Difficult Airway Management in a Patient with Klippel–Feil Syndrome: A Case Report Intense Noxious Stimulus during an Adequate Depth of General Anesthesia Produces a Transient Burst Suppression Pattern in a Density Spectral Array
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1