定价总回报掉期

W. Lou
{"title":"定价总回报掉期","authors":"W. Lou","doi":"10.3905/jod.2022.1.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Total return swap (TRS) involves a pricing dilemma: LIBOR discounting of its premium leg forces upfront payment of future funding premium, and yet replacing LIBOR with a firm’s own funding rate falls into the well-known FVA debate trap. We consider TRS hedge financing from a repo market perspective and apply postcrisis derivatives valuation with collateralization and funding to TRS. We find that the financing cost of the TRS hedge should be reflected on the security leg, and the funding premium can only be discounted in conjunction with the TRS as a whole, depending on margining schemes. An easy to implement, recursive tree model is developed to value TRS with repo-style margining or defaultable underlying, together with any value adjustments.","PeriodicalId":34223,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Derivat","volume":"30 1","pages":"66 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pricing Total Return Swaps\",\"authors\":\"W. Lou\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jod.2022.1.167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Total return swap (TRS) involves a pricing dilemma: LIBOR discounting of its premium leg forces upfront payment of future funding premium, and yet replacing LIBOR with a firm’s own funding rate falls into the well-known FVA debate trap. We consider TRS hedge financing from a repo market perspective and apply postcrisis derivatives valuation with collateralization and funding to TRS. We find that the financing cost of the TRS hedge should be reflected on the security leg, and the funding premium can only be discounted in conjunction with the TRS as a whole, depending on margining schemes. An easy to implement, recursive tree model is developed to value TRS with repo-style margining or defaultable underlying, together with any value adjustments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Derivat\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"66 - 83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Derivat\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2022.1.167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Derivat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2022.1.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

总收益掉期(TRS)涉及一个定价困境:LIBOR溢价部分的贴现迫使企业提前支付未来的融资溢价,而用企业自己的融资利率取代LIBOR则陷入了众所周知的FVA辩论陷阱。我们从回购市场的角度考虑TRS对冲融资,并将危机后衍生品估值与TRS的抵押和融资相结合。我们发现TRS套期保值的融资成本应该反映在证券部分,并且根据保证金方案,融资溢价只能与TRS作为一个整体一起贴现。开发了一种易于实现的递归树模型,通过回购风格的保证金或默认基础以及任何值调整来对TRS进行估值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pricing Total Return Swaps
Total return swap (TRS) involves a pricing dilemma: LIBOR discounting of its premium leg forces upfront payment of future funding premium, and yet replacing LIBOR with a firm’s own funding rate falls into the well-known FVA debate trap. We consider TRS hedge financing from a repo market perspective and apply postcrisis derivatives valuation with collateralization and funding to TRS. We find that the financing cost of the TRS hedge should be reflected on the security leg, and the funding premium can only be discounted in conjunction with the TRS as a whole, depending on margining schemes. An easy to implement, recursive tree model is developed to value TRS with repo-style margining or defaultable underlying, together with any value adjustments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lattice Approach for Option Pricing under Lévy Processes Caplets/Floorlets with Backward-Looking Risk-Free Rates under the One- and Two-Factor Hull-White Models Editor’s Letter Vol, Skew, and Smile Trading Option Valuation with Nonmonotonic Pricing Kernel and Embedded Volatility Component Premiums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1