悲剧还是转型:澳大利亚考古学再次站在十字路口

IF 1.1 3区历史学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Australian Archaeology Pub Date : 2021-11-07 DOI:10.1080/03122417.2021.1991426

H. Lourandos

{"title":"悲剧还是转型:澳大利亚考古学再次站在十字路口","authors":"H. Lourandos","doi":"10.1080/03122417.2021.1991426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The success of Dark Emu has reawakened old debates in Australian archaeology. The hunter/ farmer debate and the embeddedness of interpretation in postcolonial narratives have been key issues in Australian archaeology since the 1970s and 1980s. I am sympathetic, therefore, to the main arguments of the Forum piece regarding a more critical, socially conscious approach, but these also need to be contextualised historically. Most issues can be found in the earlier debates.","PeriodicalId":8648,"journal":{"name":"Australian Archaeology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tragedy or transformation: Australian archaeology at the crossroads (again)\",\"authors\":\"H. Lourandos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03122417.2021.1991426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The success of Dark Emu has reawakened old debates in Australian archaeology. The hunter/ farmer debate and the embeddedness of interpretation in postcolonial narratives have been key issues in Australian archaeology since the 1970s and 1980s. I am sympathetic, therefore, to the main arguments of the Forum piece regarding a more critical, socially conscious approach, but these also need to be contextualised historically. Most issues can be found in the earlier debates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Archaeology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03122417.2021.1991426\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03122417.2021.1991426","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

“黑鸸鹋”的成功再次唤醒了澳大利亚考古学的旧争论。自20世纪70年代和80年代以来，猎人/农民的辩论以及后殖民叙事中解释的嵌入性一直是澳大利亚考古学的关键问题。因此，我对论坛文章中关于一种更具批判性、更具社会意识的方法的主要论点表示赞同，但这些观点也需要放在历史背景中考虑。大多数问题都可以在之前的辩论中找到。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Tragedy or transformation: Australian archaeology at the crossroads (again)

The success of Dark Emu has reawakened old debates in Australian archaeology. The hunter/ farmer debate and the embeddedness of interpretation in postcolonial narratives have been key issues in Australian archaeology since the 1970s and 1980s. I am sympathetic, therefore, to the main arguments of the Forum piece regarding a more critical, socially conscious approach, but these also need to be contextualised historically. Most issues can be found in the earlier debates.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Australian Archaeology Multiple-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

9.10%

发文量