Cynthia Pestana , Steven J. Enoch , James W. Firman , Judith C. Madden , Nicoleta Spînu , Mark T.D. Cronin
{"title":"定义跨读适用域的策略","authors":"Cynthia Pestana , Steven J. Enoch , James W. Firman , Judith C. Madden , Nicoleta Spînu , Mark T.D. Cronin","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The definition, characterisation and assessment of the similarity between target and source molecules are cornerstones of the acceptance of a read-across prediction to fill a data gap for a toxicological endpoint. There is much guidance and many frameworks which are applicable in a regulatory context, but as yet no formalised process exists by which to determine whether or not the properties of an analogue (or chemicals within a category) fall within an appropriate domain from which a reliable read-across prediction can be made. This investigation has synthesised much of the existing knowledge in this area into a practical strategy to enable the domain of a read-across prediction to be defined, in terms of chemistry (structure and properties), toxicodynamics and toxicokinetics. The strategy is robust, comprehensive, flexible, and can be implemented readily. It enables the relative similarity and dissimilarity, between target and source molecules, for both the analogue and category approaches, to be analysed and provides a basis for alternative scenarios such as read-across based on formation of a common metabolite or biological profile to be defiend. Herein, the read-across domains for the repeated dose toxicity of a group of triazoles and imidazoles have been evaluated. The most challenging aspect to this approach will continue to be determining what is an “acceptable” degree of similarity when performing read-across for a specific purpose.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100220"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000081/pdfft?md5=b8375ec16a4be65bbba6c2abd495f591&pid=1-s2.0-S2468111322000081-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A strategy to define applicability domains for read-across\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia Pestana , Steven J. Enoch , James W. Firman , Judith C. Madden , Nicoleta Spînu , Mark T.D. Cronin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The definition, characterisation and assessment of the similarity between target and source molecules are cornerstones of the acceptance of a read-across prediction to fill a data gap for a toxicological endpoint. There is much guidance and many frameworks which are applicable in a regulatory context, but as yet no formalised process exists by which to determine whether or not the properties of an analogue (or chemicals within a category) fall within an appropriate domain from which a reliable read-across prediction can be made. This investigation has synthesised much of the existing knowledge in this area into a practical strategy to enable the domain of a read-across prediction to be defined, in terms of chemistry (structure and properties), toxicodynamics and toxicokinetics. The strategy is robust, comprehensive, flexible, and can be implemented readily. It enables the relative similarity and dissimilarity, between target and source molecules, for both the analogue and category approaches, to be analysed and provides a basis for alternative scenarios such as read-across based on formation of a common metabolite or biological profile to be defiend. Herein, the read-across domains for the repeated dose toxicity of a group of triazoles and imidazoles have been evaluated. The most challenging aspect to this approach will continue to be determining what is an “acceptable” degree of similarity when performing read-across for a specific purpose.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000081/pdfft?md5=b8375ec16a4be65bbba6c2abd495f591&pid=1-s2.0-S2468111322000081-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A strategy to define applicability domains for read-across
The definition, characterisation and assessment of the similarity between target and source molecules are cornerstones of the acceptance of a read-across prediction to fill a data gap for a toxicological endpoint. There is much guidance and many frameworks which are applicable in a regulatory context, but as yet no formalised process exists by which to determine whether or not the properties of an analogue (or chemicals within a category) fall within an appropriate domain from which a reliable read-across prediction can be made. This investigation has synthesised much of the existing knowledge in this area into a practical strategy to enable the domain of a read-across prediction to be defined, in terms of chemistry (structure and properties), toxicodynamics and toxicokinetics. The strategy is robust, comprehensive, flexible, and can be implemented readily. It enables the relative similarity and dissimilarity, between target and source molecules, for both the analogue and category approaches, to be analysed and provides a basis for alternative scenarios such as read-across based on formation of a common metabolite or biological profile to be defiend. Herein, the read-across domains for the repeated dose toxicity of a group of triazoles and imidazoles have been evaluated. The most challenging aspect to this approach will continue to be determining what is an “acceptable” degree of similarity when performing read-across for a specific purpose.
期刊介绍:
Computational Toxicology is an international journal publishing computational approaches that assist in the toxicological evaluation of new and existing chemical substances assisting in their safety assessment. -All effects relating to human health and environmental toxicity and fate -Prediction of toxicity, metabolism, fate and physico-chemical properties -The development of models from read-across, (Q)SARs, PBPK, QIVIVE, Multi-Scale Models -Big Data in toxicology: integration, management, analysis -Implementation of models through AOPs, IATA, TTC -Regulatory acceptance of models: evaluation, verification and validation -From metals, to small organic molecules to nanoparticles -Pharmaceuticals, pesticides, foods, cosmetics, fine chemicals -Bringing together the views of industry, regulators, academia, NGOs