定义跨读适用域的策略

IF 3.1 Q2 TOXICOLOGY Computational Toxicology Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100220
Cynthia Pestana , Steven J. Enoch , James W. Firman , Judith C. Madden , Nicoleta Spînu , Mark T.D. Cronin
{"title":"定义跨读适用域的策略","authors":"Cynthia Pestana ,&nbsp;Steven J. Enoch ,&nbsp;James W. Firman ,&nbsp;Judith C. Madden ,&nbsp;Nicoleta Spînu ,&nbsp;Mark T.D. Cronin","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The definition, characterisation and assessment of the similarity between target and source molecules are cornerstones of the acceptance of a read-across prediction to fill a data gap for a toxicological endpoint. There is much guidance and many frameworks which are applicable in a regulatory context, but as yet no formalised process exists by which to determine whether or not the properties of an analogue (or chemicals within a category) fall within an appropriate domain from which a reliable read-across prediction can be made. This investigation has synthesised much of the existing knowledge in this area into a practical strategy to enable the domain of a read-across prediction to be defined, in terms of chemistry (structure and properties), toxicodynamics and toxicokinetics. The strategy is robust, comprehensive, flexible, and can be implemented readily. It enables the relative similarity and dissimilarity, between target and source molecules, for both the analogue and category approaches, to be analysed and provides a basis for alternative scenarios such as read-across based on formation of a common metabolite or biological profile to be defiend. Herein, the read-across domains for the repeated dose toxicity of a group of triazoles and imidazoles have been evaluated. The most challenging aspect to this approach will continue to be determining what is an “acceptable” degree of similarity when performing read-across for a specific purpose.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000081/pdfft?md5=b8375ec16a4be65bbba6c2abd495f591&pid=1-s2.0-S2468111322000081-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A strategy to define applicability domains for read-across\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia Pestana ,&nbsp;Steven J. Enoch ,&nbsp;James W. Firman ,&nbsp;Judith C. Madden ,&nbsp;Nicoleta Spînu ,&nbsp;Mark T.D. Cronin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The definition, characterisation and assessment of the similarity between target and source molecules are cornerstones of the acceptance of a read-across prediction to fill a data gap for a toxicological endpoint. There is much guidance and many frameworks which are applicable in a regulatory context, but as yet no formalised process exists by which to determine whether or not the properties of an analogue (or chemicals within a category) fall within an appropriate domain from which a reliable read-across prediction can be made. This investigation has synthesised much of the existing knowledge in this area into a practical strategy to enable the domain of a read-across prediction to be defined, in terms of chemistry (structure and properties), toxicodynamics and toxicokinetics. The strategy is robust, comprehensive, flexible, and can be implemented readily. It enables the relative similarity and dissimilarity, between target and source molecules, for both the analogue and category approaches, to be analysed and provides a basis for alternative scenarios such as read-across based on formation of a common metabolite or biological profile to be defiend. Herein, the read-across domains for the repeated dose toxicity of a group of triazoles and imidazoles have been evaluated. The most challenging aspect to this approach will continue to be determining what is an “acceptable” degree of similarity when performing read-across for a specific purpose.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000081/pdfft?md5=b8375ec16a4be65bbba6c2abd495f591&pid=1-s2.0-S2468111322000081-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

靶分子和源分子之间相似性的定义、表征和评估是接受跨读预测以填补毒理学终点数据空白的基石。有许多指导和许多框架适用于监管环境,但目前还没有正式的过程来确定类似物(或类别内的化学品)的性质是否属于可以进行可靠读取预测的适当领域。这项研究综合了该领域的许多现有知识,形成了一种实用的策略,可以从化学(结构和性质)、毒性动力学和毒性动力学的角度来定义跨读预测领域。该战略稳健、全面、灵活,易于实施。它可以分析靶分子和源分子之间的相对相似性和不相似性,用于模拟和分类方法,并为替代方案提供基础,例如基于共同代谢物或生物概况的形成进行解读。本文对一组三唑和咪唑的重复剂量毒性进行了跨域读取评价。这种方法最具挑战性的方面仍然是,在为特定目的执行读取时,确定什么是“可接受的”相似性程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A strategy to define applicability domains for read-across

The definition, characterisation and assessment of the similarity between target and source molecules are cornerstones of the acceptance of a read-across prediction to fill a data gap for a toxicological endpoint. There is much guidance and many frameworks which are applicable in a regulatory context, but as yet no formalised process exists by which to determine whether or not the properties of an analogue (or chemicals within a category) fall within an appropriate domain from which a reliable read-across prediction can be made. This investigation has synthesised much of the existing knowledge in this area into a practical strategy to enable the domain of a read-across prediction to be defined, in terms of chemistry (structure and properties), toxicodynamics and toxicokinetics. The strategy is robust, comprehensive, flexible, and can be implemented readily. It enables the relative similarity and dissimilarity, between target and source molecules, for both the analogue and category approaches, to be analysed and provides a basis for alternative scenarios such as read-across based on formation of a common metabolite or biological profile to be defiend. Herein, the read-across domains for the repeated dose toxicity of a group of triazoles and imidazoles have been evaluated. The most challenging aspect to this approach will continue to be determining what is an “acceptable” degree of similarity when performing read-across for a specific purpose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computational Toxicology
Computational Toxicology Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Computational Toxicology is an international journal publishing computational approaches that assist in the toxicological evaluation of new and existing chemical substances assisting in their safety assessment. -All effects relating to human health and environmental toxicity and fate -Prediction of toxicity, metabolism, fate and physico-chemical properties -The development of models from read-across, (Q)SARs, PBPK, QIVIVE, Multi-Scale Models -Big Data in toxicology: integration, management, analysis -Implementation of models through AOPs, IATA, TTC -Regulatory acceptance of models: evaluation, verification and validation -From metals, to small organic molecules to nanoparticles -Pharmaceuticals, pesticides, foods, cosmetics, fine chemicals -Bringing together the views of industry, regulators, academia, NGOs
期刊最新文献
Developing quantitative Adverse Outcome Pathways: An ordinary differential equation-based computational framework Species specific kinetics of imidacloprid and carbendazim in mouse and rat and consequences for biomonitoring In silico analysis of the melamine structural analogues interaction with calcium-sensing receptor: A potential for nephrotoxicity Modeling chemical bioaccumulation in snakes, part 1: Model development Modeling chemical bioaccumulation in snakes, part 2: Model testing and high-throughput simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1