低剂量纳曲酮与萘普生缓释片对膝骨关节炎疼痛缓解的影响,一项三盲、非劣效性II期随机对照试验(FREEDOM)-研究方案

Caio C. Kasai
{"title":"低剂量纳曲酮与萘普生缓释片对膝骨关节炎疼痛缓解的影响,一项三盲、非劣效性II期随机对照试验(FREEDOM)-研究方案","authors":"Caio C. Kasai","doi":"10.21801/PPCRJ.2021.71.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background and objectives: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative articular disease that affects approximately 240 million people worldwide, with knee OA accounting for 80% of this burden. One of the aims of pharmacological treatment in OA is to reduce pain. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective for pain relief in OA but have considerable renal, hepatic, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal adverse effects, with the resultant increase in morbidity and mortality. Naltrexone is an orally activated opioid antagonist that has varied dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effects: Analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects are exhibited only at low dosage ranges of 0.5mg to 4.5mg (Low Dose Naltrexone LDN) while retaining a favorable adverse effect profile. This study aims to test the non-inferiority of LDN against Naproxen. Methodology: This is a prospective phase II triple-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. The intervention group will receive low dose naltrexone 4.5 mg once daily, and the control group will receive extended-release naproxen 1000 mg once daily during the 12 week trial duration. Our sample size will be 118 patients recruited from a single Orthopedic referral center in the USA. Discussion: The use of LDN for pain relief in osteoarthritis (OA) may be beneficial due to its favorable adverse effect profile. To the best of our knowledge, there is no published data on LDN use in OA even though preliminary evidence has documented its safety and tolerability in a variety of chronic pain conditions.","PeriodicalId":74496,"journal":{"name":"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Low dose Naltrexone versus Naproxen Extended-release for Pain Relief in knee osteoarthritis, a Triple-blinded, Non-inferiority Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial (FREEDOM) - Study Protocol\",\"authors\":\"Caio C. Kasai\",\"doi\":\"10.21801/PPCRJ.2021.71.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Background and objectives: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative articular disease that affects approximately 240 million people worldwide, with knee OA accounting for 80% of this burden. One of the aims of pharmacological treatment in OA is to reduce pain. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective for pain relief in OA but have considerable renal, hepatic, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal adverse effects, with the resultant increase in morbidity and mortality. Naltrexone is an orally activated opioid antagonist that has varied dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effects: Analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects are exhibited only at low dosage ranges of 0.5mg to 4.5mg (Low Dose Naltrexone LDN) while retaining a favorable adverse effect profile. This study aims to test the non-inferiority of LDN against Naproxen. Methodology: This is a prospective phase II triple-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. The intervention group will receive low dose naltrexone 4.5 mg once daily, and the control group will receive extended-release naproxen 1000 mg once daily during the 12 week trial duration. Our sample size will be 118 patients recruited from a single Orthopedic referral center in the USA. Discussion: The use of LDN for pain relief in osteoarthritis (OA) may be beneficial due to its favorable adverse effect profile. To the best of our knowledge, there is no published data on LDN use in OA even though preliminary evidence has documented its safety and tolerability in a variety of chronic pain conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21801/PPCRJ.2021.71.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21801/PPCRJ.2021.71.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:骨关节炎(OA)是一种退行性关节疾病,影响全球约2.4亿人,膝关节OA占这一负担的80%。骨性关节炎药物治疗的目的之一是减轻疼痛。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)可有效缓解OA患者的疼痛,但对肾脏、肝脏、心血管和胃肠道有相当大的不良反应,导致发病率和死亡率增加。纳曲酮是一种口服激活的阿片类拮抗剂,具有多种剂量依赖性的药效学作用:镇痛和抗炎作用仅在0.5mg至4.5mg的低剂量范围内表现出来(低剂量纳曲酮LDN),同时保持良好的不良反应特征。本研究旨在检验LDN对萘普生的非劣效性。方法学:这是一项前瞻性II期三盲、双臂、平行组、非劣效性随机对照试验。干预组给予低剂量纳曲酮4.5 mg每日1次,对照组给予缓释萘普生1000 mg每日1次,为期12周。我们的样本量将从美国一个骨科转诊中心招募118名患者。讨论:使用LDN缓解骨关节炎(OA)的疼痛可能是有益的,因为它有良好的不良反应。据我们所知,尽管初步证据证明LDN在各种慢性疼痛条件下的安全性和耐受性,但目前还没有关于LDN在OA中使用的公开数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Low dose Naltrexone versus Naproxen Extended-release for Pain Relief in knee osteoarthritis, a Triple-blinded, Non-inferiority Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial (FREEDOM) - Study Protocol
: Background and objectives: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative articular disease that affects approximately 240 million people worldwide, with knee OA accounting for 80% of this burden. One of the aims of pharmacological treatment in OA is to reduce pain. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective for pain relief in OA but have considerable renal, hepatic, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal adverse effects, with the resultant increase in morbidity and mortality. Naltrexone is an orally activated opioid antagonist that has varied dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effects: Analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects are exhibited only at low dosage ranges of 0.5mg to 4.5mg (Low Dose Naltrexone LDN) while retaining a favorable adverse effect profile. This study aims to test the non-inferiority of LDN against Naproxen. Methodology: This is a prospective phase II triple-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. The intervention group will receive low dose naltrexone 4.5 mg once daily, and the control group will receive extended-release naproxen 1000 mg once daily during the 12 week trial duration. Our sample size will be 118 patients recruited from a single Orthopedic referral center in the USA. Discussion: The use of LDN for pain relief in osteoarthritis (OA) may be beneficial due to its favorable adverse effect profile. To the best of our knowledge, there is no published data on LDN use in OA even though preliminary evidence has documented its safety and tolerability in a variety of chronic pain conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for phantom limb pain: from pilot mechanistic studies to large clinical studies. Enhancing Dissemination and Understanding in Clinical Research Protocols: Optimizing Visual Communication in a Phantom Limb Pain Clinical Trial. Physical Conditioning, Obesity and Fibromyalgia: Causal Relationship or Confounding? Editorial - Seeking Brain Homeostatic Compensatory Mechanisms for Pain Control. XIV International Symposium of Neuromodulation: Conference Abstracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1