坦桑尼亚卫生技术评估:卫生技术评估委员会成员的能力和经验

Gavin Surgey, A. Mori, R. Baltussen
{"title":"坦桑尼亚卫生技术评估:卫生技术评估委员会成员的能力和经验","authors":"Gavin Surgey, A. Mori, R. Baltussen","doi":"10.52872/001c.33116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tanzania established a Health Technology Assessment Committee in recognition of the increasing role of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) to achieve universal health coverage. The committee has the mandate to develop recommendations on the reimbursement of technologies for decision-makers. It is widely recognized that there are challenges to the technical capacity and human resource availability of HTA, including that of decision-making committees. Committee members need to combine scientific and social judgments vis-a-vis the technology under evaluation. This paper reports on a self-administered survey among committee members to assess their capacity for the tasks at hand. A survey was developed and sent to all members of the HTA committee in Tanzania. Responses were analyzed, and key themes explored. Out of 20 committee members, 15 members completed the survey (response rate 75%). Committee members were primarily government employees who were qualified and well-experienced in clinical medicine. However, they were less qualified and experienced in HTA and expressed low confidence in this subject matter. The results indicate the type of evidence an advisory committee can reasonably be expected to understand and handle. It can also guide future capacity-strengthening activities and programmes, and serve as a baseline for measuring the impact of these programmes.","PeriodicalId":73758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health economics and policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Technology Assessment in Tanzania: Capacity and Experience of HTA Committee Members\",\"authors\":\"Gavin Surgey, A. Mori, R. Baltussen\",\"doi\":\"10.52872/001c.33116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tanzania established a Health Technology Assessment Committee in recognition of the increasing role of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) to achieve universal health coverage. The committee has the mandate to develop recommendations on the reimbursement of technologies for decision-makers. It is widely recognized that there are challenges to the technical capacity and human resource availability of HTA, including that of decision-making committees. Committee members need to combine scientific and social judgments vis-a-vis the technology under evaluation. This paper reports on a self-administered survey among committee members to assess their capacity for the tasks at hand. A survey was developed and sent to all members of the HTA committee in Tanzania. Responses were analyzed, and key themes explored. Out of 20 committee members, 15 members completed the survey (response rate 75%). Committee members were primarily government employees who were qualified and well-experienced in clinical medicine. However, they were less qualified and experienced in HTA and expressed low confidence in this subject matter. The results indicate the type of evidence an advisory committee can reasonably be expected to understand and handle. It can also guide future capacity-strengthening activities and programmes, and serve as a baseline for measuring the impact of these programmes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of global health economics and policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of global health economics and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52872/001c.33116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health economics and policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52872/001c.33116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

坦桑尼亚认识到卫生技术评估在实现全民健康覆盖方面日益重要的作用,成立了卫生技术评估委员会。该委员会的任务是为决策者制定关于偿还技术费用的建议。人们普遍认识到,卫生行政部门,包括决策委员会的技术能力和人力资源供应面临挑战。委员会成员需要对所评估的技术进行科学和社会判断。本文报告了一项委员会成员自我管理的调查,以评估他们手头任务的能力。制定了一项调查,并将其发给坦桑尼亚人道主义援助委员会的所有成员。对回应进行了分析,并探讨了关键主题。在20名委员中,15名委员完成了调查(回复率75%)。委员会成员主要是具有临床医学资格和丰富经验的政府雇员。然而,他们在HTA方面缺乏资格和经验,对这一主题缺乏信心。结果表明,可以合理地期望咨询委员会理解和处理的证据类型。它还可以指导今后的能力加强活动和方案,并作为衡量这些方案影响的基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health Technology Assessment in Tanzania: Capacity and Experience of HTA Committee Members
Tanzania established a Health Technology Assessment Committee in recognition of the increasing role of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) to achieve universal health coverage. The committee has the mandate to develop recommendations on the reimbursement of technologies for decision-makers. It is widely recognized that there are challenges to the technical capacity and human resource availability of HTA, including that of decision-making committees. Committee members need to combine scientific and social judgments vis-a-vis the technology under evaluation. This paper reports on a self-administered survey among committee members to assess their capacity for the tasks at hand. A survey was developed and sent to all members of the HTA committee in Tanzania. Responses were analyzed, and key themes explored. Out of 20 committee members, 15 members completed the survey (response rate 75%). Committee members were primarily government employees who were qualified and well-experienced in clinical medicine. However, they were less qualified and experienced in HTA and expressed low confidence in this subject matter. The results indicate the type of evidence an advisory committee can reasonably be expected to understand and handle. It can also guide future capacity-strengthening activities and programmes, and serve as a baseline for measuring the impact of these programmes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The present value of human life losses associated with COVID-19 in South Africa The approach taken by Canada’s province of Nova Scotia to ban the sale of flavoured electronic cigarettes Use of population indices in cancer research: a scoping review Shaping market access for sustainable production of vaccines in Africa Using mobile health to strengthen the communication skills for effective delivery of health information in Nepal: A qualitative study of the perspectives of Female Community Health Volunteers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1