抑制蛙坐骨神经神经传导的镇痛药和镇痛助剂——局部麻醉剂、阿片类药物、α2肾上腺素受体激动剂、抗癫痫药、抗抑郁药和非甾体抗炎药

Pain Research Pub Date : 2019-12-20 DOI:10.11154/pain.34.291
E. Kumamoto, T. Fujita
{"title":"抑制蛙坐骨神经神经传导的镇痛药和镇痛助剂——局部麻醉剂、阿片类药物、α2肾上腺素受体激动剂、抗癫痫药、抗抑郁药和非甾体抗炎药","authors":"E. Kumamoto, T. Fujita","doi":"10.11154/pain.34.291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many of analgesics and analgesic adjuvants act on nerve conduction and synaptic transmission in the nervous system to inhibit nociceptive transmission. It has not been fully examined how nerve conduction inhibition leading to antinociception differs in extent among various analgesics and analgesic adjuvants. We examined quantitatively their actions on fast–conducting compound action potentials (CAPs) recorded from the frog sciatic nerve. Drugs tested were local anesthetics, opioids, adrenoceptor agonists, antiepileptics, antidepressants and non–steroidal anti– inflam matory drugs (NSAIDs). As a result, we found that many of their drugs reduce the peak amplitude of the CAPs in a manner dependent on their chemical structures. Consistent with voltage–gated Na + –channel inhibition produced by local anesthetics, CAP peak amplitudes were reduced by procaine, cocaine, tetracaine, prilocaine, lidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine and pramoxine with the half– maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) values of 2 . 2 , 0 . 80 , 0 . 013 , 1 . 8 , 0 . 74 , 0 . 34 , 0 . 23 and 0 . 21 mM, respectively. A weak opioid tramadol reduced CAP peak amplitude s (IC 50 = 2 . 3 mM) more effectively than its metabolite mono– O – demethyl–tramadol; this distinction was attributed to such a difference in chemical structure that tramadol and mono– O –demethyl–tramadol have –OCH 3 and –OH bound to a benzene ring, respectively. Moreover, NSAIDs [tolfenamic acid, meclofenamic acid and flufenamic acid (IC 50 values: 0 . 29 , 0 . 19 and 0 . 22 mM, respectively)]. On the other hand, salicylic acid–based (aspirin), propionic acid–based (ketoprofen, ibuprofen, naproxen, loxoprofen and flurbiprofen) and enolic acid–based (meloxicam and piroxicam) NSAIDs had no effect on CAPs. In conclusion, CAP inhibitions produced by local anesthetics were partly comparable in extent to those of a 2 –adrenoceptor agonists, antiepileptics, antidepressants and NSAIDs; opioids inhibited CAPs less potently than their drugs. It is suggested that analgesics and analgesic adjuvants inhibit nerve conduction in a manner dependent on their chemical structures.","PeriodicalId":41148,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analgesics and analgesic adjuvants inhibiting nerve conduction in the frog sciatic nerve —local anesthetics, opioids, α2 adrenoceptor agonists, antiepileptics, antidepressants and NSAIDs\",\"authors\":\"E. Kumamoto, T. Fujita\",\"doi\":\"10.11154/pain.34.291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many of analgesics and analgesic adjuvants act on nerve conduction and synaptic transmission in the nervous system to inhibit nociceptive transmission. It has not been fully examined how nerve conduction inhibition leading to antinociception differs in extent among various analgesics and analgesic adjuvants. We examined quantitatively their actions on fast–conducting compound action potentials (CAPs) recorded from the frog sciatic nerve. Drugs tested were local anesthetics, opioids, adrenoceptor agonists, antiepileptics, antidepressants and non–steroidal anti– inflam matory drugs (NSAIDs). As a result, we found that many of their drugs reduce the peak amplitude of the CAPs in a manner dependent on their chemical structures. Consistent with voltage–gated Na + –channel inhibition produced by local anesthetics, CAP peak amplitudes were reduced by procaine, cocaine, tetracaine, prilocaine, lidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine and pramoxine with the half– maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) values of 2 . 2 , 0 . 80 , 0 . 013 , 1 . 8 , 0 . 74 , 0 . 34 , 0 . 23 and 0 . 21 mM, respectively. A weak opioid tramadol reduced CAP peak amplitude s (IC 50 = 2 . 3 mM) more effectively than its metabolite mono– O – demethyl–tramadol; this distinction was attributed to such a difference in chemical structure that tramadol and mono– O –demethyl–tramadol have –OCH 3 and –OH bound to a benzene ring, respectively. Moreover, NSAIDs [tolfenamic acid, meclofenamic acid and flufenamic acid (IC 50 values: 0 . 29 , 0 . 19 and 0 . 22 mM, respectively)]. On the other hand, salicylic acid–based (aspirin), propionic acid–based (ketoprofen, ibuprofen, naproxen, loxoprofen and flurbiprofen) and enolic acid–based (meloxicam and piroxicam) NSAIDs had no effect on CAPs. In conclusion, CAP inhibitions produced by local anesthetics were partly comparable in extent to those of a 2 –adrenoceptor agonists, antiepileptics, antidepressants and NSAIDs; opioids inhibited CAPs less potently than their drugs. It is suggested that analgesics and analgesic adjuvants inhibit nerve conduction in a manner dependent on their chemical structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11154/pain.34.291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11154/pain.34.291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多镇痛药和镇痛佐剂作用于神经系统的神经传导和突触传递,抑制伤害性传递。神经传导抑制导致的抗痛觉作用在不同镇痛药和镇痛佐剂之间的程度如何不同还没有得到充分的研究。我们定量地检测了它们对青蛙坐骨神经记录的快速传导复合动作电位(CAPs)的作用。测试的药物包括局麻药、阿片类药物、肾上腺素受体激动剂、抗癫痫药、抗抑郁药和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)。结果,我们发现他们的许多药物以一种依赖于其化学结构的方式降低了cap的峰值幅度。普鲁卡因、可卡因、丁卡因、普丙卡因、利多卡因、罗哌卡因、左旋布比卡因和普拉莫辛均可降低CAP峰幅,半数最大抑制浓度(IC 50)为2,与局麻药产生的电压门控Na +通道抑制一致。2,0。80,0。[13, 1]8,0。74,0。34,0。23和0。分别为21毫米。弱阿片类药物曲马多降低了CAP峰振幅s (ic50 = 2)。3 mM)比其代谢物单O -去甲基曲马多更有效;这种区别是由于曲马多和单- O -去甲基曲马多在化学结构上的差异,它们的苯环上分别有- och 3和- oh键。非甾体抗炎药[甲氯芬那酸、甲氯芬那酸和氟芬那酸]的ic50值为0。29,0。19和0。22 mM)]。另一方面,水杨酸类非甾体抗炎药(阿司匹林)、丙酸类非甾体抗炎药(酮洛芬、布洛芬、萘普生、洛洛芬和氟比洛芬)和烯酸类非甾体抗炎药(美洛昔康和吡洛昔康)对CAPs无影响。综上所述,局麻药对CAP的抑制作用在一定程度上与a - 2肾上腺素受体激动剂、抗癫痫药、抗抑郁药和非甾体抗炎药相当;阿片类药物对cap的抑制作用不如药物。这表明,镇痛药和镇痛佐剂抑制神经传导的方式依赖于它们的化学结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analgesics and analgesic adjuvants inhibiting nerve conduction in the frog sciatic nerve —local anesthetics, opioids, α2 adrenoceptor agonists, antiepileptics, antidepressants and NSAIDs
Many of analgesics and analgesic adjuvants act on nerve conduction and synaptic transmission in the nervous system to inhibit nociceptive transmission. It has not been fully examined how nerve conduction inhibition leading to antinociception differs in extent among various analgesics and analgesic adjuvants. We examined quantitatively their actions on fast–conducting compound action potentials (CAPs) recorded from the frog sciatic nerve. Drugs tested were local anesthetics, opioids, adrenoceptor agonists, antiepileptics, antidepressants and non–steroidal anti– inflam matory drugs (NSAIDs). As a result, we found that many of their drugs reduce the peak amplitude of the CAPs in a manner dependent on their chemical structures. Consistent with voltage–gated Na + –channel inhibition produced by local anesthetics, CAP peak amplitudes were reduced by procaine, cocaine, tetracaine, prilocaine, lidocaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine and pramoxine with the half– maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) values of 2 . 2 , 0 . 80 , 0 . 013 , 1 . 8 , 0 . 74 , 0 . 34 , 0 . 23 and 0 . 21 mM, respectively. A weak opioid tramadol reduced CAP peak amplitude s (IC 50 = 2 . 3 mM) more effectively than its metabolite mono– O – demethyl–tramadol; this distinction was attributed to such a difference in chemical structure that tramadol and mono– O –demethyl–tramadol have –OCH 3 and –OH bound to a benzene ring, respectively. Moreover, NSAIDs [tolfenamic acid, meclofenamic acid and flufenamic acid (IC 50 values: 0 . 29 , 0 . 19 and 0 . 22 mM, respectively)]. On the other hand, salicylic acid–based (aspirin), propionic acid–based (ketoprofen, ibuprofen, naproxen, loxoprofen and flurbiprofen) and enolic acid–based (meloxicam and piroxicam) NSAIDs had no effect on CAPs. In conclusion, CAP inhibitions produced by local anesthetics were partly comparable in extent to those of a 2 –adrenoceptor agonists, antiepileptics, antidepressants and NSAIDs; opioids inhibited CAPs less potently than their drugs. It is suggested that analgesics and analgesic adjuvants inhibit nerve conduction in a manner dependent on their chemical structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research
Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Interaction between dorsal horn neuron subsets operated by a neuropeptide Y and prodynorphin promoter and its contribution to Aβ fiber–induced allodynia–like behavior in rats Expression profiles of Tmem120A ⁄ TACAN in rat skeletal muscle subjected to exercise and inflammation Expression profiles of Tmem120A ⁄ TACAN in rat skeletal muscle subjected to exercise and inflammation Outcomes of 707 cervical selective nerve root blocks using a fluoroscopy–guided posterolateral oblique approach Exploratory study of factors affecting quality of life among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A cross–sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1