基于p -速度表征岩石弹性模量的不确定性量化

IF 6.5 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Georisk-Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards Pub Date : 2022-09-08 DOI:10.1080/17499518.2022.2119580
Jian Liu, Q. Jiang, Ding-ping Xu, Hong Zheng, F. Gong, Jie Xin
{"title":"基于p -速度表征岩石弹性模量的不确定性量化","authors":"Jian Liu, Q. Jiang, Ding-ping Xu, Hong Zheng, F. Gong, Jie Xin","doi":"10.1080/17499518.2022.2119580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The elastic modulus of rock is an important parameter in rock engineering, but the common methods based on laboratory tests are laborious, especially for obtaining the probability distribution of the elastic modulus that is required in reliability-based design. Many scholars have studied the regression model between the elastic modulus and P-wave velocity; however, most previous reports have ignored the characterization of parameter variability and model uncertainty. To address this problem, a large number of granite samples are collected from the Yingliangbao hydropower station (YLB), compressive wave velocity (P-wave velocity) and uniaxial compression tests are carried out in the laboratory. Then, four different regression models based on the frequentist method and Bayesian method are established to estimate the elastic modulus, the normal priors are adopted by prior analysis and the widely applicable information criterion (WAIC) is used to select the most appropriate Bayesian regression model. Finally, the effects of sample size and sample selection on different methods are studied, the results obtained from different priors are compared. The results show that the Bayesian method provides estimations that are more consistent with the test data and has better robustness in given sets of different sample selections, especially in small sample size.","PeriodicalId":48524,"journal":{"name":"Georisk-Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards","volume":"17 1","pages":"521 - 542"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty quantification for characterization of rock elastic modulus based on P-velocity\",\"authors\":\"Jian Liu, Q. Jiang, Ding-ping Xu, Hong Zheng, F. Gong, Jie Xin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17499518.2022.2119580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The elastic modulus of rock is an important parameter in rock engineering, but the common methods based on laboratory tests are laborious, especially for obtaining the probability distribution of the elastic modulus that is required in reliability-based design. Many scholars have studied the regression model between the elastic modulus and P-wave velocity; however, most previous reports have ignored the characterization of parameter variability and model uncertainty. To address this problem, a large number of granite samples are collected from the Yingliangbao hydropower station (YLB), compressive wave velocity (P-wave velocity) and uniaxial compression tests are carried out in the laboratory. Then, four different regression models based on the frequentist method and Bayesian method are established to estimate the elastic modulus, the normal priors are adopted by prior analysis and the widely applicable information criterion (WAIC) is used to select the most appropriate Bayesian regression model. Finally, the effects of sample size and sample selection on different methods are studied, the results obtained from different priors are compared. The results show that the Bayesian method provides estimations that are more consistent with the test data and has better robustness in given sets of different sample selections, especially in small sample size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georisk-Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"521 - 542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georisk-Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2022.2119580\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georisk-Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2022.2119580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要岩石的弹性模量是岩石工程中的一个重要参数,但基于实验室试验的常用方法很费力,尤其是在获得基于可靠性的设计所需的弹性模量的概率分布方面。许多学者研究了弹性模量与纵波速度之间的回归模型;然而,以前的大多数报告都忽略了参数可变性和模型不确定性的表征。为了解决这一问题,从英良堡水电站采集了大量花岗岩样品,在实验室进行了压缩波速(P波速)和单轴压缩试验。然后,基于频率论方法和贝叶斯方法建立了四种不同的回归模型来估计弹性模量,采用正态先验进行先验分析,并使用广泛适用的信息准则(WAIC)来选择最合适的贝叶斯回归模型。最后,研究了样本大小和样本选择对不同方法的影响,并对不同先验的结果进行了比较。结果表明,贝叶斯方法提供的估计与测试数据更加一致,并且在给定的不同样本选择集中具有更好的鲁棒性,尤其是在小样本量下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uncertainty quantification for characterization of rock elastic modulus based on P-velocity
ABSTRACT The elastic modulus of rock is an important parameter in rock engineering, but the common methods based on laboratory tests are laborious, especially for obtaining the probability distribution of the elastic modulus that is required in reliability-based design. Many scholars have studied the regression model between the elastic modulus and P-wave velocity; however, most previous reports have ignored the characterization of parameter variability and model uncertainty. To address this problem, a large number of granite samples are collected from the Yingliangbao hydropower station (YLB), compressive wave velocity (P-wave velocity) and uniaxial compression tests are carried out in the laboratory. Then, four different regression models based on the frequentist method and Bayesian method are established to estimate the elastic modulus, the normal priors are adopted by prior analysis and the widely applicable information criterion (WAIC) is used to select the most appropriate Bayesian regression model. Finally, the effects of sample size and sample selection on different methods are studied, the results obtained from different priors are compared. The results show that the Bayesian method provides estimations that are more consistent with the test data and has better robustness in given sets of different sample selections, especially in small sample size.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Georisk covers many diversified but interlinked areas of active research and practice, such as geohazards (earthquakes, landslides, avalanches, rockfalls, tsunamis, etc.), safety of engineered systems (dams, buildings, offshore structures, lifelines, etc.), environmental risk, seismic risk, reliability-based design and code calibration, geostatistics, decision analyses, structural reliability, maintenance and life cycle performance, risk and vulnerability, hazard mapping, loss assessment (economic, social, environmental, etc.), GIS databases, remote sensing, and many other related disciplines. The underlying theme is that uncertainties associated with geomaterials (soils, rocks), geologic processes, and possible subsequent treatments, are usually large and complex and these uncertainties play an indispensable role in the risk assessment and management of engineered and natural systems. Significant theoretical and practical challenges remain on quantifying these uncertainties and developing defensible risk management methodologies that are acceptable to decision makers and stakeholders. Many opportunities to leverage on the rapid advancement in Bayesian analysis, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and other data-driven methods also exist, which can greatly enhance our decision-making abilities. The basic goal of this international peer-reviewed journal is to provide a multi-disciplinary scientific forum for cross fertilization of ideas between interested parties working on various aspects of georisk to advance the state-of-the-art and the state-of-the-practice.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Impact of Engineering Works in Megatidal Areas Using Satellite Images—Case of the Mont-Saint-Michel Bay, France Assessment of a Machine Learning Algorithm Using Web Images for Flood Detection and Water Level Estimates Digital geotechnics: from data-driven site characterisation towards digital transformation and intelligence in geotechnical engineering Induced Seismicity Hazard Assessment for a Potential CO2 Storage Site in the Southern San Joaquin Basin, CA Novel evaluation methodology for mechanical behaviour and instability risk of roof structure using limited investigation data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1