争取奖励还是让他们负责?激励员工的努力和表现

IF 1.2 Q4 MANAGEMENT JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1177/03063070231187266
Brett A. Rixom, Jessica M. Rixom
{"title":"争取奖励还是让他们负责?激励员工的努力和表现","authors":"Brett A. Rixom, Jessica M. Rixom","doi":"10.1177/03063070231187266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations often turn to extrinsic motivators to improve employee effort and performance, with mixed results. In this research, performance-based benefits and accountability are explored to assess whether they differentially affect where effort is exerted and how they influence overall performance. The study proposes that effort can be divided into two components—strategic effort and execution effort—and that each component will influence overall performance differently. The study uses a scenario-based experiment involving a complex and unfamiliar task. The results indicate that workers motivated by performance-based benefits increase the use of strategic effort, which improves performance through the identification of critical problems, and they develop a better overall strategy relative to workers who are held accountable. The study also indicates that while accountability increased the use of execution effort, the additional effort did not improve performance in the complex task setting. The study highlights the importance of aligning an extrinsic motivator to the type of effort desired for a particular task.","PeriodicalId":46142,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strive for rewards or keep them accountable? Motivating employees’ effort and performance\",\"authors\":\"Brett A. Rixom, Jessica M. Rixom\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03063070231187266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organizations often turn to extrinsic motivators to improve employee effort and performance, with mixed results. In this research, performance-based benefits and accountability are explored to assess whether they differentially affect where effort is exerted and how they influence overall performance. The study proposes that effort can be divided into two components—strategic effort and execution effort—and that each component will influence overall performance differently. The study uses a scenario-based experiment involving a complex and unfamiliar task. The results indicate that workers motivated by performance-based benefits increase the use of strategic effort, which improves performance through the identification of critical problems, and they develop a better overall strategy relative to workers who are held accountable. The study also indicates that while accountability increased the use of execution effort, the additional effort did not improve performance in the complex task setting. The study highlights the importance of aligning an extrinsic motivator to the type of effort desired for a particular task.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070231187266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070231187266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

组织经常求助于外在的激励因素来提高员工的努力和绩效,结果喜忧参半。在这项研究中,对基于绩效的福利和问责制进行了探讨,以评估它们是否会对努力的发挥产生不同的影响,以及它们如何影响整体绩效。该研究提出,努力可以分为两个组成部分——战略努力和执行努力——每个组成部分对整体绩效的影响不同。这项研究使用了一个基于场景的实验,涉及一项复杂而陌生的任务。结果表明,受基于绩效的福利激励的员工增加了战略努力的使用,这通过识别关键问题来提高绩效,并且相对于被问责的员工,他们制定了更好的整体战略。研究还表明,虽然问责制增加了执行努力的使用,但额外的努力并没有改善复杂任务环境中的绩效。这项研究强调了将外在激励因素与特定任务所需的努力类型相结合的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strive for rewards or keep them accountable? Motivating employees’ effort and performance
Organizations often turn to extrinsic motivators to improve employee effort and performance, with mixed results. In this research, performance-based benefits and accountability are explored to assess whether they differentially affect where effort is exerted and how they influence overall performance. The study proposes that effort can be divided into two components—strategic effort and execution effort—and that each component will influence overall performance differently. The study uses a scenario-based experiment involving a complex and unfamiliar task. The results indicate that workers motivated by performance-based benefits increase the use of strategic effort, which improves performance through the identification of critical problems, and they develop a better overall strategy relative to workers who are held accountable. The study also indicates that while accountability increased the use of execution effort, the additional effort did not improve performance in the complex task setting. The study highlights the importance of aligning an extrinsic motivator to the type of effort desired for a particular task.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Journal of General Management is quarterly peer reviewed journal, with a mission to provide thought leadership by publishing articles on managerial practices with organisation-wide or cross-functional implications. We seek original theoretical and practical insights into general management in all types of organisations.
期刊最新文献
Capital structure decisions and R&D investment: The contingency role of firm size The mediating role of self-efficacy and stress on school climate and teachers’ job satisfaction linkages Patiently winning through virtuous leadership: The impact of virtuous leadership behavior on employee engagement across time Revisiting the impact of strategic board involvement on organizational performance Supply chain integration capability: A three-stage circular model of visibility, agility, and flexibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1