侧位平片动态负荷摄影预测骨质疏松性椎体骨折保守治疗中的治疗阻力

T. Funayama, T. Tsukanishi, T. Abe, H. Kumagai, Shigeo Izawa, H. Noguchi, Kengo Fujii, Y. Shibao, M. Koda, M. Yamazaki
{"title":"侧位平片动态负荷摄影预测骨质疏松性椎体骨折保守治疗中的治疗阻力","authors":"T. Funayama, T. Tsukanishi, T. Abe, H. Kumagai, Shigeo Izawa, H. Noguchi, Kengo Fujii, Y. Shibao, M. Koda, M. Yamazaki","doi":"10.4172/2165-7939.1000404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To elucidate the association between computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiographic findings of fractured vertebral body instability in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures and to clarify whether resistance to conservative treatment can be evaluated on the basis of dynamic loading radiography.Methods: Seventy-eight patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent conservative treatment for osteoporotic single vertebral fractures of the thoracolumbar junction were divided into the conservative treatment-resistant group (18 patients) and control group (60 patients). We evaluated the accuracy of the prediction of resistance to conservative treatment on the basis of the CT/MRI findings and the difference in compression rates between standing and supine positions at the time of the first visit. The differences in compression rates (%) were compared between the two groups. In addition, a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the accuracy of the prediction of resistance to conservative treatment.Results: In patients without (47 cases) and with CT findings (31 cases), the mean differences in compression rates (%) was 8.9% and 19.1%, respectively (p=0.0029). The mean differences in compression rates (%) of patients without (60 cases) and with MRI findings (18 cases) was 9.7% and 24.0%, respectively (p=0.0043). The mean differences in compression rates (%) in the conservative treatment-resistant group was 26.3%, while that in the control group was 9.0 (p=0.0066). In addition, according to the ROC curve of the difference in compression rate was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.87–1), and when a 20% difference in compression rate was considered as the threshold value.Conclusion: Dynamic loading radiography is useful for the evaluation of resistance to conservative treatment in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, and that a compression rate difference of ≥ 20% predicts resistance to conservative treatment.","PeriodicalId":89593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7939.1000404","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Treatment Resistance in Conservative Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures Using Lateral Plain Dynamic Loading Radiographs\",\"authors\":\"T. Funayama, T. Tsukanishi, T. Abe, H. Kumagai, Shigeo Izawa, H. Noguchi, Kengo Fujii, Y. Shibao, M. Koda, M. Yamazaki\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2165-7939.1000404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To elucidate the association between computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiographic findings of fractured vertebral body instability in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures and to clarify whether resistance to conservative treatment can be evaluated on the basis of dynamic loading radiography.Methods: Seventy-eight patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent conservative treatment for osteoporotic single vertebral fractures of the thoracolumbar junction were divided into the conservative treatment-resistant group (18 patients) and control group (60 patients). We evaluated the accuracy of the prediction of resistance to conservative treatment on the basis of the CT/MRI findings and the difference in compression rates between standing and supine positions at the time of the first visit. The differences in compression rates (%) were compared between the two groups. In addition, a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the accuracy of the prediction of resistance to conservative treatment.Results: In patients without (47 cases) and with CT findings (31 cases), the mean differences in compression rates (%) was 8.9% and 19.1%, respectively (p=0.0029). The mean differences in compression rates (%) of patients without (60 cases) and with MRI findings (18 cases) was 9.7% and 24.0%, respectively (p=0.0043). The mean differences in compression rates (%) in the conservative treatment-resistant group was 26.3%, while that in the control group was 9.0 (p=0.0066). In addition, according to the ROC curve of the difference in compression rate was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.87–1), and when a 20% difference in compression rate was considered as the threshold value.Conclusion: Dynamic loading radiography is useful for the evaluation of resistance to conservative treatment in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, and that a compression rate difference of ≥ 20% predicts resistance to conservative treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7939.1000404\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7939.1000404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7939.1000404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:阐明计算机断层扫描(CT)/磁共振成像(MRI)与骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者骨折椎体不稳定的放射学表现之间的关系,并阐明是否可以在动态负荷放射学的基础上评估保守治疗的抵抗力。方法:78例年龄≥65岁的胸腰椎交界处骨质疏松性单椎体骨折患者,分为保守治疗组(18例)和对照组(60例)。我们根据CT/MRI检查结果以及第一次就诊时站立和仰卧位之间压迫率的差异,评估了保守治疗阻力预测的准确性。比较两组之间压缩率(%)的差异。此外,还绘制了受试者工作特性(ROC)曲线,以评估保守治疗耐药性预测的准确性。结果:无CT(47例)和有CT(31例)患者的压迫率(%)平均差异分别为8.9%和19.1%(p=0.0029),分别为(p=0.0043)。保守治疗耐药组的压缩率平均差异(%)为26.3%,而对照组为9.0(p=0.0066)。此外,根据ROC曲线,压缩率差异为0.93(95%置信区间:0.87-1),当压缩率差异20%作为阈值时。结论:动态负荷造影可用于评估骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者对保守治疗的抵抗力,压缩率差异≥20%可预测对保守治疗抵抗力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of Treatment Resistance in Conservative Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures Using Lateral Plain Dynamic Loading Radiographs
Purpose: To elucidate the association between computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiographic findings of fractured vertebral body instability in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures and to clarify whether resistance to conservative treatment can be evaluated on the basis of dynamic loading radiography.Methods: Seventy-eight patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent conservative treatment for osteoporotic single vertebral fractures of the thoracolumbar junction were divided into the conservative treatment-resistant group (18 patients) and control group (60 patients). We evaluated the accuracy of the prediction of resistance to conservative treatment on the basis of the CT/MRI findings and the difference in compression rates between standing and supine positions at the time of the first visit. The differences in compression rates (%) were compared between the two groups. In addition, a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the accuracy of the prediction of resistance to conservative treatment.Results: In patients without (47 cases) and with CT findings (31 cases), the mean differences in compression rates (%) was 8.9% and 19.1%, respectively (p=0.0029). The mean differences in compression rates (%) of patients without (60 cases) and with MRI findings (18 cases) was 9.7% and 24.0%, respectively (p=0.0043). The mean differences in compression rates (%) in the conservative treatment-resistant group was 26.3%, while that in the control group was 9.0 (p=0.0066). In addition, according to the ROC curve of the difference in compression rate was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.87–1), and when a 20% difference in compression rate was considered as the threshold value.Conclusion: Dynamic loading radiography is useful for the evaluation of resistance to conservative treatment in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, and that a compression rate difference of ≥ 20% predicts resistance to conservative treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nerve Injury in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Importance of Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Agents in Spine Surgery Theoretical Model of the Lumbar Spine Musculature Editorial Note on Spondylolysis & Spondylolisthesis A Rare Case of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression Originating from Extragonadal Mediastinal Yolk Sac Tumor: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1