响应

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION Critical Research on Religion Pub Date : 2022-12-24 DOI:10.1177/20503032221148466

M. Horii

{"title":"响应","authors":"M. Horii","doi":"10.1177/20503032221148466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am very grateful to Professor Naomi Goldenberg, Dr. Suzanne Owen, and Dr. Alex Henley for their insightful comments and for the time and effort they kindly extended to my book. We four share the understanding that “religion” is a problematic category, and use the so-called “critical religion” approach in our own academic work. At the same time, there are some differences between us. These are expressed in their comments. These differences provide me with valuable insights. Their critical reflections on my book are helpful for the further development of my own study. In the following paragraphs, I would like to give my constructive responses to the comments made by these three scholars.","PeriodicalId":43214,"journal":{"name":"Critical Research on Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response\",\"authors\":\"M. Horii\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20503032221148466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I am very grateful to Professor Naomi Goldenberg, Dr. Suzanne Owen, and Dr. Alex Henley for their insightful comments and for the time and effort they kindly extended to my book. We four share the understanding that “religion” is a problematic category, and use the so-called “critical religion” approach in our own academic work. At the same time, there are some differences between us. These are expressed in their comments. These differences provide me with valuable insights. Their critical reflections on my book are helpful for the further development of my own study. In the following paragraphs, I would like to give my constructive responses to the comments made by these three scholars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Research on Religion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Research on Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032221148466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Research on Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032221148466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我非常感谢Naomi Goldenberg教授、Suzanne Owen博士和Alex Henley博士的深刻见解，感谢他们为我的书所付出的时间和精力。我们四个人都认为“宗教”是一个有问题的范畴，并在我们自己的学术工作中使用所谓的“批判宗教”方法。与此同时，我们之间也存在一些差异。这些都在他们的评论中表达出来。这些差异为我提供了宝贵的见解。他们对我的书的批判性思考对我自己研究的进一步发展是有帮助的。我愿在以下几段话中，对三位学者的评论作出建设性回应。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Response

I am very grateful to Professor Naomi Goldenberg, Dr. Suzanne Owen, and Dr. Alex Henley for their insightful comments and for the time and effort they kindly extended to my book. We four share the understanding that “religion” is a problematic category, and use the so-called “critical religion” approach in our own academic work. At the same time, there are some differences between us. These are expressed in their comments. These differences provide me with valuable insights. Their critical reflections on my book are helpful for the further development of my own study. In the following paragraphs, I would like to give my constructive responses to the comments made by these three scholars.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Critical Research on Religion RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Research on Religion is a peer-reviewed, international journal focusing on the development of a critical theoretical framework and its application to research on religion. It provides a common venue for those engaging in critical analysis in theology and religious studies, as well as for those who critically study religion in the other social sciences and humanities such as philosophy, sociology, anthropology, psychology, history, and literature. A critical approach examines religious phenomena according to both their positive and negative impacts. It draws on methods including but not restricted to the critical theory of the Frankfurt School, Marxism, post-structuralism, feminism, psychoanalysis, ideological criticism, post-colonialism, ecocriticism, and queer studies. The journal seeks to enhance an understanding of how religious institutions and religious thought may simultaneously serve as a source of domination and progressive social change. It attempts to understand the role of religion within social and political conflicts. These conflicts are often based on differences of race, class, ethnicity, region, gender, and sexual orientation – all of which are shaped by social, political, and economic inequity. The journal encourages submissions of theoretically guided articles on current issues as well as those with historical interest using a wide range of methodologies including qualitative, quantitative, and archival. It publishes articles, review essays, book reviews, thematic issues, symposia, and interviews.