不同保存方法对酵母培养物活力的比较研究

Reham M Abdallah, Ibrahim Rizk Sayed Ahmed, Amal A. Hassan, hemmat Elshesheetawy
{"title":"不同保存方法对酵母培养物活力的比较研究","authors":"Reham M Abdallah, Ibrahim Rizk Sayed Ahmed, Amal A. Hassan, hemmat Elshesheetawy","doi":"10.21608/ajs.2021.67476.1348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The influence of chilling, freezing, and drying preservation methods on morphological properties and viability of four yeast cultures, isolated Saccharomyces boulardii (SB1 and SB2), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC), and Kluyveromyces lactis (KL), was studied. chilling preservation had no effect on yeast colony morphology parameters till the end of the preservation period in contrast with freezing and drying preservation methods. Drying preservation resulted in the highest viability decrement % of yeast cultures ranged between 59.38 to 40.21% as compared with other preservation methods. There is a noticeable reduction in D values of preserved yeast cultures by drying, which varied from (33 to 26 day) in comparison to chilling and freezing preservation that recorded (119 to 83 and 180 to 57 day), respectively. The obtained results revealed that chilling preservation under proper conditions, as well as freezing, is more preferable for the preservation of studied yeast cultures than that preserved yeast by the drying method.","PeriodicalId":8366,"journal":{"name":"Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study between different preservation methods on the viability of some yeast cultures\",\"authors\":\"Reham M Abdallah, Ibrahim Rizk Sayed Ahmed, Amal A. Hassan, hemmat Elshesheetawy\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ajs.2021.67476.1348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The influence of chilling, freezing, and drying preservation methods on morphological properties and viability of four yeast cultures, isolated Saccharomyces boulardii (SB1 and SB2), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC), and Kluyveromyces lactis (KL), was studied. chilling preservation had no effect on yeast colony morphology parameters till the end of the preservation period in contrast with freezing and drying preservation methods. Drying preservation resulted in the highest viability decrement % of yeast cultures ranged between 59.38 to 40.21% as compared with other preservation methods. There is a noticeable reduction in D values of preserved yeast cultures by drying, which varied from (33 to 26 day) in comparison to chilling and freezing preservation that recorded (119 to 83 and 180 to 57 day), respectively. The obtained results revealed that chilling preservation under proper conditions, as well as freezing, is more preferable for the preservation of studied yeast cultures than that preserved yeast by the drying method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajs.2021.67476.1348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajs.2021.67476.1348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究了冷却、冷冻和干燥保存方法对博拉氏酵母菌(SB1和SB2)、酿酒酵母菌(SC)和克鲁维酵母菌(Kluyveromyces lactis)四种酵母菌培养物形态特性和活力的影响。与冷冻和干燥保存相比,冷冻保存对酵母菌落形态参数没有影响。与其他保存方法相比,干燥保存的酵母培养物活力下降率最高,为59.38% ~ 40.21%。干燥保存的酵母培养物的D值明显降低,与冷却和冷冻保存(分别记录为119至83天和180至57天)相比,干燥保存的D值在33至26天之间变化。结果表明,在适当的条件下冷冻保存和冷冻保存酵母培养物比用干燥方法保存酵母更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study between different preservation methods on the viability of some yeast cultures
The influence of chilling, freezing, and drying preservation methods on morphological properties and viability of four yeast cultures, isolated Saccharomyces boulardii (SB1 and SB2), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC), and Kluyveromyces lactis (KL), was studied. chilling preservation had no effect on yeast colony morphology parameters till the end of the preservation period in contrast with freezing and drying preservation methods. Drying preservation resulted in the highest viability decrement % of yeast cultures ranged between 59.38 to 40.21% as compared with other preservation methods. There is a noticeable reduction in D values of preserved yeast cultures by drying, which varied from (33 to 26 day) in comparison to chilling and freezing preservation that recorded (119 to 83 and 180 to 57 day), respectively. The obtained results revealed that chilling preservation under proper conditions, as well as freezing, is more preferable for the preservation of studied yeast cultures than that preserved yeast by the drying method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rootability of some mulberry cultivars Some Natural and Chemical Materials Directly Affect Pests of Mulberry Trees and Indirectly Silkworm Larvae In Vitro, Evaluation of Organic and Mineral Treatments Against Potato Black-leg Disease (Pectobacterium atrosepticum) Effects of feeding Dairy cattle on Total Mixed Rations (TMR) versus Traditional feeding of Concentrate and Roughage in Sudan Harvesting Microalgae by Chitosan as Sustainable Biopolymer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1