手术治疗急性细菌性筛窦炎所致骨膜下眶脓肿的回顾性研究

J. H. Therchilsen, A. A. Muhamad, A. T. Bilde, C. Buchwald
{"title":"手术治疗急性细菌性筛窦炎所致骨膜下眶脓肿的回顾性研究","authors":"J. H. Therchilsen, A. A. Muhamad, A. T. Bilde, C. Buchwald","doi":"10.4193/rhinol/19.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Subperiosteal abscesses (SPOA) are a complication of acute purulent sinusitis, and their optimal treatment regime is a controversial topic. Some otolaryngologists consider surgery to be mandatory in the treatment of subperiosteal abscesses others advocate that especially paediatric patients can be treated medically in some cases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our current treatment guidelines for subperiosteal abscesses. Methodology: A retrospective study was undertaken from 2010 to 2016, including patients registered with the diagnosis of subperiosteal abscesses derived from acute sinusitis based on clinical diagnoses, and CTs or MRIs. All patients received treatment with IV-antibiotics and were booked for prompt surgery. The main outcome measures were CT-measurements and intraoperatively identified pus. Treatment included antibiotic choice, microbiology, and outcomes. Results: Thirty-one patients were included in the study having the diagnosis of sinusitis and SPOA. Per operatively, we found pus in the subperiosteal space in 21/31 patients and 17 of the patients with available contrast-enhanced CT scans. When patients were grouped based on radiographically confirmed abscesses or not per the preoperative MRI or CT, we found that the presumed abscess volume was 0.83 mL greater in the patients, who had an abscess confirmed during surgery. Two patients needed endoscopic re-operation. In addition, three patients had sequela at the last follow-up, two with minor subjective sequelae due to oedema most likely resolving themselves over time and one with memory and concentration difficulties due to intracranial","PeriodicalId":74737,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology online","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective study of surgically treated subperiosteal orbital abscesses derived from acute bacterial ethmoid sinusitis\",\"authors\":\"J. H. Therchilsen, A. A. Muhamad, A. T. Bilde, C. Buchwald\",\"doi\":\"10.4193/rhinol/19.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Subperiosteal abscesses (SPOA) are a complication of acute purulent sinusitis, and their optimal treatment regime is a controversial topic. Some otolaryngologists consider surgery to be mandatory in the treatment of subperiosteal abscesses others advocate that especially paediatric patients can be treated medically in some cases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our current treatment guidelines for subperiosteal abscesses. Methodology: A retrospective study was undertaken from 2010 to 2016, including patients registered with the diagnosis of subperiosteal abscesses derived from acute sinusitis based on clinical diagnoses, and CTs or MRIs. All patients received treatment with IV-antibiotics and were booked for prompt surgery. The main outcome measures were CT-measurements and intraoperatively identified pus. Treatment included antibiotic choice, microbiology, and outcomes. Results: Thirty-one patients were included in the study having the diagnosis of sinusitis and SPOA. Per operatively, we found pus in the subperiosteal space in 21/31 patients and 17 of the patients with available contrast-enhanced CT scans. When patients were grouped based on radiographically confirmed abscesses or not per the preoperative MRI or CT, we found that the presumed abscess volume was 0.83 mL greater in the patients, who had an abscess confirmed during surgery. Two patients needed endoscopic re-operation. In addition, three patients had sequela at the last follow-up, two with minor subjective sequelae due to oedema most likely resolving themselves over time and one with memory and concentration difficulties due to intracranial\",\"PeriodicalId\":74737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhinology online\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhinology online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4193/rhinol/19.021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/rhinol/19.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:骨膜下脓肿是急性化脓性鼻窦炎的一种并发症,其最佳治疗方案一直是一个有争议的话题。一些耳鼻喉科医生认为手术治疗骨膜下脓肿是强制性的,另一些人则主张,在某些情况下,尤其是儿科患者可以接受医学治疗。本研究的目的是评估我们目前对骨膜下脓肿的治疗指南。方法:从2010年到2016年进行了一项回顾性研究,包括根据临床诊断和CT或MRI诊断为急性鼻窦炎骨膜下脓肿的患者。所有患者都接受了静脉注射抗生素的治疗,并被安排立即进行手术。主要的结果测量是CT测量和术中发现的脓液。治疗包括抗生素的选择、微生物学和结果。结果:31例诊断为鼻窦炎和SPOA的患者被纳入研究。每次手术,我们在21/31名患者和17名有增强CT扫描的患者中发现骨膜下间隙有脓液。当根据放射学确认的脓肿对患者进行分组时,无论是否根据术前MRI或CT,我们发现在手术中确认脓肿的患者的假定脓肿体积大0.83 mL。两名患者需要内镜下再次手术。此外,三名患者在最后一次随访时出现后遗症,两名患者因水肿而出现轻微主观后遗症,很可能随着时间的推移自行解决,一名患者因颅内出血而出现记忆和注意力困难
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A retrospective study of surgically treated subperiosteal orbital abscesses derived from acute bacterial ethmoid sinusitis
Background: Subperiosteal abscesses (SPOA) are a complication of acute purulent sinusitis, and their optimal treatment regime is a controversial topic. Some otolaryngologists consider surgery to be mandatory in the treatment of subperiosteal abscesses others advocate that especially paediatric patients can be treated medically in some cases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our current treatment guidelines for subperiosteal abscesses. Methodology: A retrospective study was undertaken from 2010 to 2016, including patients registered with the diagnosis of subperiosteal abscesses derived from acute sinusitis based on clinical diagnoses, and CTs or MRIs. All patients received treatment with IV-antibiotics and were booked for prompt surgery. The main outcome measures were CT-measurements and intraoperatively identified pus. Treatment included antibiotic choice, microbiology, and outcomes. Results: Thirty-one patients were included in the study having the diagnosis of sinusitis and SPOA. Per operatively, we found pus in the subperiosteal space in 21/31 patients and 17 of the patients with available contrast-enhanced CT scans. When patients were grouped based on radiographically confirmed abscesses or not per the preoperative MRI or CT, we found that the presumed abscess volume was 0.83 mL greater in the patients, who had an abscess confirmed during surgery. Two patients needed endoscopic re-operation. In addition, three patients had sequela at the last follow-up, two with minor subjective sequelae due to oedema most likely resolving themselves over time and one with memory and concentration difficulties due to intracranial
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 control protocol for rhinologic surgery Trends in dupilumab persistence among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps Dupilumab as an emerging treatment for refractory allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: a case series and literature review Capturing qualitative olfactory dysfunction with PARPHAIT: the parosmia, phantosmia, and anosmia test Prevalence of smell and taste dysfunction in different clinical severity groups of COVID-19 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1