通过水力压裂和HTPF测试原位测量岩洞应力的挑战——案例研究:阿扎德水电站项目

IF 1.1 Q3 MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING Journal of Mining and Environment Pub Date : 2021-06-07 DOI:10.22044/JME.2021.10673.2037
M. Shahverdiloo, S. Zare
{"title":"通过水力压裂和HTPF测试原位测量岩洞应力的挑战——案例研究:阿扎德水电站项目","authors":"M. Shahverdiloo, S. Zare","doi":"10.22044/JME.2021.10673.2037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydraulic fracturing (HF) and hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF) are efficient hydraulic methods in order to determine the in-situ stress of rock mass. Generally, the minimum (Sh) and maximum (SH) horizontal principal stresses are measured by hydraulic methods; the vertical stress (SV) is calculated by the weight of the overburden layers. In this work, 37 HF and HTPF tests are conducted in a meta-sandstone, which has about 10% inter-layer phyllite. The artesian circumstance, considerable gap between the drilling and hydraulic tests in the long borehole, no underground access tunnel to rock cavern at the early stages of projects, and a simplified hypothesis theory of HF are the main challenges and limitations of the HF/HTPF measurements. Due to the instability in the long borehole, the drill rig type and borehole length are revised; also TV logger is added to the process of selection of the test’s deep. The HF/HTPF data is sequentially analyzed by the classic and inversion methods in order to achieve an optimum number of hydraulic tests. Besides, The SH magnitude in the inversion method is lower than the classic method; the relevant geological data and the faulting plan analysis lead to validate the SH and Sh magnitudes and the azimuths obtained by the classic method. The measured SH and Sh magnitudes are 7-17 MPa and 4-11 MPa, respectively; the calculated vertical stress magnitude is 6-14 MPa at the test locations. Indeed, the stress state is (SH > SV > Sh), and SH azimuth range is 56-93 degrees.","PeriodicalId":45259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mining and Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges for In-Situ Stress Measurement in Rock Caverns by Hydraulic Fracturing and HTPF Tests-Case Study: Azad Hydropower Project\",\"authors\":\"M. Shahverdiloo, S. Zare\",\"doi\":\"10.22044/JME.2021.10673.2037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hydraulic fracturing (HF) and hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF) are efficient hydraulic methods in order to determine the in-situ stress of rock mass. Generally, the minimum (Sh) and maximum (SH) horizontal principal stresses are measured by hydraulic methods; the vertical stress (SV) is calculated by the weight of the overburden layers. In this work, 37 HF and HTPF tests are conducted in a meta-sandstone, which has about 10% inter-layer phyllite. The artesian circumstance, considerable gap between the drilling and hydraulic tests in the long borehole, no underground access tunnel to rock cavern at the early stages of projects, and a simplified hypothesis theory of HF are the main challenges and limitations of the HF/HTPF measurements. Due to the instability in the long borehole, the drill rig type and borehole length are revised; also TV logger is added to the process of selection of the test’s deep. The HF/HTPF data is sequentially analyzed by the classic and inversion methods in order to achieve an optimum number of hydraulic tests. Besides, The SH magnitude in the inversion method is lower than the classic method; the relevant geological data and the faulting plan analysis lead to validate the SH and Sh magnitudes and the azimuths obtained by the classic method. The measured SH and Sh magnitudes are 7-17 MPa and 4-11 MPa, respectively; the calculated vertical stress magnitude is 6-14 MPa at the test locations. Indeed, the stress state is (SH > SV > Sh), and SH azimuth range is 56-93 degrees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mining and Environment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mining and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22044/JME.2021.10673.2037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mining and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22044/JME.2021.10673.2037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

水力压裂(HF)和已有裂缝水力测试(HTPF)是确定岩体地应力的有效水力方法。通常,最小(Sh)和最大(Sh)水平主应力是通过水力方法测量的;垂直应力(SV)通过覆盖层的重量来计算。在这项工作中,在一个变质砂岩中进行了37次HF和HTPF测试,该砂岩含有约10%的层间千枚岩。承压环境、长钻孔中的钻孔和水压试验之间存在相当大的差距、项目早期没有通往岩洞的地下通道以及HF的简化假设理论是HF/HTPF测量的主要挑战和局限性。由于长钻孔不稳定,修改了钻机类型和钻孔长度;电视记录器也被添加到测试深度的选择过程中。通过经典方法和反演方法对HF/HTPF数据进行顺序分析,以获得最佳的水力试验次数。此外,反演方法中的SH值低于经典方法;相关的地质数据和断层平面分析验证了用经典方法获得的SH和SH震级和方位角。测得的SH和SH大小分别为7-17MPa和4-11MPa;计算出的测试位置的垂直应力大小为6-14MPa。实际上,应力状态为(SH>SV>SH),SH方位角范围为56-93度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Challenges for In-Situ Stress Measurement in Rock Caverns by Hydraulic Fracturing and HTPF Tests-Case Study: Azad Hydropower Project
Hydraulic fracturing (HF) and hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF) are efficient hydraulic methods in order to determine the in-situ stress of rock mass. Generally, the minimum (Sh) and maximum (SH) horizontal principal stresses are measured by hydraulic methods; the vertical stress (SV) is calculated by the weight of the overburden layers. In this work, 37 HF and HTPF tests are conducted in a meta-sandstone, which has about 10% inter-layer phyllite. The artesian circumstance, considerable gap between the drilling and hydraulic tests in the long borehole, no underground access tunnel to rock cavern at the early stages of projects, and a simplified hypothesis theory of HF are the main challenges and limitations of the HF/HTPF measurements. Due to the instability in the long borehole, the drill rig type and borehole length are revised; also TV logger is added to the process of selection of the test’s deep. The HF/HTPF data is sequentially analyzed by the classic and inversion methods in order to achieve an optimum number of hydraulic tests. Besides, The SH magnitude in the inversion method is lower than the classic method; the relevant geological data and the faulting plan analysis lead to validate the SH and Sh magnitudes and the azimuths obtained by the classic method. The measured SH and Sh magnitudes are 7-17 MPa and 4-11 MPa, respectively; the calculated vertical stress magnitude is 6-14 MPa at the test locations. Indeed, the stress state is (SH > SV > Sh), and SH azimuth range is 56-93 degrees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mining and Environment
Journal of Mining and Environment MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fe3O4@TiO2@V2O5 as an efficient magnetic nanoparticle for synthesis of di-indolyl oxindole derivatives Propose a viable stabilization method for slope in weak rock mass environment using numerical modelling: A case study from the cut slopes Estimation of optimum geometric configuration of mine dumps in Wardha valley coalfields in India: a case study An investigation on tailing slurry transport in Kooshk lead-zinc mine in Iran based on non-Newtonian fluid rheology: an experimental study Carnallite Flotation of Khur Biabanak Potash Complex using kimiaflot 619 as a New Collector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1