richardennis的真知灼见捐赠管理者比其他人更好吗?

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Investing Pub Date : 2022-06-18 DOI:10.3905/joi.2022.1.232
Richard M. Ennis
{"title":"richardennis的真知灼见捐赠管理者比其他人更好吗?","authors":"Richard M. Ennis","doi":"10.3905/joi.2022.1.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I compare five aspects of investing large educational endowments and public employee pension funds: operating environment and culture, institutional characteristics, expense ratio, risk habitat, and risk-adjusted performance. The most significant measurable differences between the two types of investing institutions are: 1) the amount they spend on investment management and 2) the degree of risk they take. In terms of risk-adjusted performance, endowments have underperformed public funds by a small margin for the 13 years ending June 30, 2021. There is no evidence that endowment managers have an edge over public fund managers of a type or magnitude that might translate to a performance advantage.","PeriodicalId":45504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"richard ennis’s insights Are Endowment Managers Better Than the Rest?\",\"authors\":\"Richard M. Ennis\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/joi.2022.1.232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I compare five aspects of investing large educational endowments and public employee pension funds: operating environment and culture, institutional characteristics, expense ratio, risk habitat, and risk-adjusted performance. The most significant measurable differences between the two types of investing institutions are: 1) the amount they spend on investment management and 2) the degree of risk they take. In terms of risk-adjusted performance, endowments have underperformed public funds by a small margin for the 13 years ending June 30, 2021. There is no evidence that endowment managers have an edge over public fund managers of a type or magnitude that might translate to a performance advantage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2022.1.232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2022.1.232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我比较了投资大型教育捐赠基金和公共雇员养老基金的五个方面:经营环境和文化、机构特征、费用率、风险栖息地和风险调整后的绩效。两种类型的投资机构之间最显著的可衡量的差异是:1)他们在投资管理上花费的金额和2)他们承担的风险程度。就风险调整后的业绩而言,截至2021年6月30日的13年里,捐赠基金的表现略低于公共基金。没有证据表明,在某种类型或规模上,捐赠基金经理比公共基金经理有优势,这可能转化为业绩优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
richard ennis’s insights Are Endowment Managers Better Than the Rest?
I compare five aspects of investing large educational endowments and public employee pension funds: operating environment and culture, institutional characteristics, expense ratio, risk habitat, and risk-adjusted performance. The most significant measurable differences between the two types of investing institutions are: 1) the amount they spend on investment management and 2) the degree of risk they take. In terms of risk-adjusted performance, endowments have underperformed public funds by a small margin for the 13 years ending June 30, 2021. There is no evidence that endowment managers have an edge over public fund managers of a type or magnitude that might translate to a performance advantage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Investing
Journal of Investing BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
A New Global Portfolio Weighting Strategy Based on Cointegration Methods “I Have Never Seen a Bad Backtest”: Modeling Reality in Quantitative Investing Predicting Market Risk Premiums with Historical Patterns How Many Securities Should an Active Manager hold? What Makes the Dollar Cost Averaging Strategy So Popular Today? A Critical Review of the Benefits and Risks of a Controversial Investment Scheme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1