操作对流许可模式下中尺度对流组织特征的客观评估

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Monthly Weather Review Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI:10.1175/mwr-d-23-0033.1
Ewan Short, T. Lane
{"title":"操作对流许可模式下中尺度对流组织特征的客观评估","authors":"Ewan Short, T. Lane","doi":"10.1175/mwr-d-23-0033.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe realism of convective organization in operational convection permitting model simulations is objectively assessed, with a particular focus on the mesoscale aspects, such as convective mode. A tracking and classification algorithm is applied to observed radar reflectivity and simulated radar reflectivity from the operational ACCESS-C convection permitting forecast domain over northern Australia between October 2020 and May 2022, and characteristics of real and simulated convective organization compared. Mesoscale convective systems from the operational forecast model are approximately twice as likely to be oriented parallel to the ambient wind and ambient wind shear than those observed by radar, indicating a bias toward the “training line” systems typically associated with more extreme rainfall. During highly humid active monsoon conditions, simulated convective systems have larger ground-relative speeds than systems observed in radar. Although there is less than 5% difference between the ratios of simulated and observed trailing, leading and parallel stratiform system observations, significant differences exist in other wind-shear-based classifications. For instance, in absolute terms, simulated systems are 10–35% less likely to be up-shear tilted, and 15-30% less likely to be down-shear propagating than observed systems, suggesting errors in simulated cold pool characteristics.","PeriodicalId":18824,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Weather Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objectively Assessing Characteristics of Mesoscale Convective Organization in an Operational Convection Permitting Model\",\"authors\":\"Ewan Short, T. Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/mwr-d-23-0033.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe realism of convective organization in operational convection permitting model simulations is objectively assessed, with a particular focus on the mesoscale aspects, such as convective mode. A tracking and classification algorithm is applied to observed radar reflectivity and simulated radar reflectivity from the operational ACCESS-C convection permitting forecast domain over northern Australia between October 2020 and May 2022, and characteristics of real and simulated convective organization compared. Mesoscale convective systems from the operational forecast model are approximately twice as likely to be oriented parallel to the ambient wind and ambient wind shear than those observed by radar, indicating a bias toward the “training line” systems typically associated with more extreme rainfall. During highly humid active monsoon conditions, simulated convective systems have larger ground-relative speeds than systems observed in radar. Although there is less than 5% difference between the ratios of simulated and observed trailing, leading and parallel stratiform system observations, significant differences exist in other wind-shear-based classifications. For instance, in absolute terms, simulated systems are 10–35% less likely to be up-shear tilted, and 15-30% less likely to be down-shear propagating than observed systems, suggesting errors in simulated cold pool characteristics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monthly Weather Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monthly Weather Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-23-0033.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Weather Review","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-23-0033.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对运行对流许可模式模拟中对流组织的真实性进行了客观评估,特别关注中尺度方面,如对流模式。将跟踪和分类算法应用于2020年10月至2022年5月期间澳大利亚北部ACCESS-C对流允许预报区的观测雷达反射率和模拟雷达反射率,并比较了真实和模拟对流组织的特征。运行预测模型中的中尺度对流系统平行于环境风和环境风切变的可能性大约是雷达观测到的两倍,这表明它偏向于通常与更极端的降雨相关的“训练线”系统。在高度潮湿的活跃季风条件下,模拟对流系统的地面相对速度比雷达观测到的系统大。尽管模拟和观测到的尾随、引导和平行层状系统观测的比率之间的差异不到5%,但在其他基于风切变的分类中存在显著差异。例如,从绝对值来看,模拟系统向上剪切倾斜的可能性比观察到的系统低10-35%,向下剪切传播的可能性低15-30%,这表明模拟冷池特性存在误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Objectively Assessing Characteristics of Mesoscale Convective Organization in an Operational Convection Permitting Model
The realism of convective organization in operational convection permitting model simulations is objectively assessed, with a particular focus on the mesoscale aspects, such as convective mode. A tracking and classification algorithm is applied to observed radar reflectivity and simulated radar reflectivity from the operational ACCESS-C convection permitting forecast domain over northern Australia between October 2020 and May 2022, and characteristics of real and simulated convective organization compared. Mesoscale convective systems from the operational forecast model are approximately twice as likely to be oriented parallel to the ambient wind and ambient wind shear than those observed by radar, indicating a bias toward the “training line” systems typically associated with more extreme rainfall. During highly humid active monsoon conditions, simulated convective systems have larger ground-relative speeds than systems observed in radar. Although there is less than 5% difference between the ratios of simulated and observed trailing, leading and parallel stratiform system observations, significant differences exist in other wind-shear-based classifications. For instance, in absolute terms, simulated systems are 10–35% less likely to be up-shear tilted, and 15-30% less likely to be down-shear propagating than observed systems, suggesting errors in simulated cold pool characteristics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Monthly Weather Review (MWR) (ISSN: 0027-0644; eISSN: 1520-0493) publishes research relevant to the analysis and prediction of observed atmospheric circulations and physics, including technique development, data assimilation, model validation, and relevant case studies. This research includes numerical and data assimilation techniques that apply to the atmosphere and/or ocean environments. MWR also addresses phenomena having seasonal and subseasonal time scales.
期刊最新文献
Predicting fibrosis progression in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients using the FAST Score: A paired biopsy study. Improvement of albedo and snow-cover simulation during snow events over the Tibetan Plateau Influences of the South American Low-Level Jet on the Convective Environment in Central Argentina using a Convection-Permitting Simulation Orographic Controls on Extreme Precipitation associated with a Mei-yu Front The Response of Precipitation to Initial Soil Moisture over the Tibetan Plateau: Respective Effects of Boundary Layer Vertical Heat and Vapor Diffusions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1