电缆堆场作业性能及其评价综述

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY International Journal of Forest Engineering Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.1080/14942119.2022.2153505
Stephan Böhm, C. Kanzian
{"title":"电缆堆场作业性能及其评价综述","authors":"Stephan Böhm, C. Kanzian","doi":"10.1080/14942119.2022.2153505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cable yarding is a well-established practice for wood extraction in mountainous regions in most parts of the world where fully mechanized harvesting systems like harvester-forwarder combinations cannot operate due to steep terrain. Work- and time-studies are most relevant to create productivity models for cost estimation, simulation, system development or simply to compare different harvesting systems. The present work investigates 70 work studies on cable yarding operations, regarding assessment methods to establish a knowledge base on cable yarding performance models. A comprehensive literature research was performed to identify relevant studies. Information about the investigated extraction campaigns regarding site specifics, stock specifics, the utilized equipment alongside the work-study-methods, as well as the statistical approaches for model creation were collected. The data gained and the associated models were systematically analyzed to compare different yarding systems concerning their performance. A set of 98 models was selected for this purpose. Productivity of the investigated systems ranges from 1.5 m3/PSH to 69.3 m3/PSH with a mean value of 9.8 m3/PSH where PSH represents the productive system hour. A meta-analysis was performed with the data that is presented in the literature found to test several hypotheses concerning the influence of different parameters on the performance of yarding systems. Various relationships are so strong that regression analysis with the meta-dataset, that is mostly containing mean values presented, results in significant correlations. The diversity in problem formulation and the corresponding diversity in methodical approaches account for limitations in comparability of performance. The consultation of guiding literature on forest work studies can promote comparability between studies.","PeriodicalId":55998,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forest Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review on cable yarding operation performance and its assessment\",\"authors\":\"Stephan Böhm, C. Kanzian\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14942119.2022.2153505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Cable yarding is a well-established practice for wood extraction in mountainous regions in most parts of the world where fully mechanized harvesting systems like harvester-forwarder combinations cannot operate due to steep terrain. Work- and time-studies are most relevant to create productivity models for cost estimation, simulation, system development or simply to compare different harvesting systems. The present work investigates 70 work studies on cable yarding operations, regarding assessment methods to establish a knowledge base on cable yarding performance models. A comprehensive literature research was performed to identify relevant studies. Information about the investigated extraction campaigns regarding site specifics, stock specifics, the utilized equipment alongside the work-study-methods, as well as the statistical approaches for model creation were collected. The data gained and the associated models were systematically analyzed to compare different yarding systems concerning their performance. A set of 98 models was selected for this purpose. Productivity of the investigated systems ranges from 1.5 m3/PSH to 69.3 m3/PSH with a mean value of 9.8 m3/PSH where PSH represents the productive system hour. A meta-analysis was performed with the data that is presented in the literature found to test several hypotheses concerning the influence of different parameters on the performance of yarding systems. Various relationships are so strong that regression analysis with the meta-dataset, that is mostly containing mean values presented, results in significant correlations. The diversity in problem formulation and the corresponding diversity in methodical approaches account for limitations in comparability of performance. The consultation of guiding literature on forest work studies can promote comparability between studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Forest Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Forest Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2022.2153505\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forest Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2022.2153505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:在世界大多数地区的山区,电缆堆场是一种公认的木材提取方法,因为地形陡峭,像收割机-货机组合这样的全机械化收割系统无法运行。工作和时间研究最相关的是为成本估算、模拟、系统开发创建生产力模型,或者只是比较不同的收割系统。本工作调查了70项关于电缆堆放作业的工作研究,涉及建立电缆堆放性能模型知识库的评估方法。进行了全面的文献研究,以确定相关研究。收集了有关调查提取活动的信息,包括场地细节、库存细节、使用的设备以及工作研究方法,以及模型创建的统计方法。对获得的数据和相关模型进行了系统分析,以比较不同的码垛系统的性能。为此选择了一套98种型号。所研究系统的生产率范围为1.5m3/PSH至69.3m3/PSH,平均值为9.8m3/PSH,其中PSH表示生产系统小时。对文献中提供的数据进行了荟萃分析,以检验关于不同参数对码垛系统性能影响的几个假设。各种关系如此强烈,以至于使用元数据集进行回归分析(主要包含所呈现的平均值)会产生显著的相关性。问题表述的多样性和系统方法的相应多样性说明了绩效可比性的局限性。查阅森林工作研究的指导性文献可以促进研究之间的可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A review on cable yarding operation performance and its assessment
ABSTRACT Cable yarding is a well-established practice for wood extraction in mountainous regions in most parts of the world where fully mechanized harvesting systems like harvester-forwarder combinations cannot operate due to steep terrain. Work- and time-studies are most relevant to create productivity models for cost estimation, simulation, system development or simply to compare different harvesting systems. The present work investigates 70 work studies on cable yarding operations, regarding assessment methods to establish a knowledge base on cable yarding performance models. A comprehensive literature research was performed to identify relevant studies. Information about the investigated extraction campaigns regarding site specifics, stock specifics, the utilized equipment alongside the work-study-methods, as well as the statistical approaches for model creation were collected. The data gained and the associated models were systematically analyzed to compare different yarding systems concerning their performance. A set of 98 models was selected for this purpose. Productivity of the investigated systems ranges from 1.5 m3/PSH to 69.3 m3/PSH with a mean value of 9.8 m3/PSH where PSH represents the productive system hour. A meta-analysis was performed with the data that is presented in the literature found to test several hypotheses concerning the influence of different parameters on the performance of yarding systems. Various relationships are so strong that regression analysis with the meta-dataset, that is mostly containing mean values presented, results in significant correlations. The diversity in problem formulation and the corresponding diversity in methodical approaches account for limitations in comparability of performance. The consultation of guiding literature on forest work studies can promote comparability between studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
21.10%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Productivity benchmarks for unguyed excavator-based tower yarders Novel approach for forest road maintenance using smartphone sensor data and deep learning methods Machine learning applications in forest and biomass supply chain management: a review Mechanical site preparation in South Africa: comparing the productivity of pitting machine operators under different site conditions Stem recovery and harvesting productivity of two different harvesting systems in final felling of Pinus patula
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1