生物涡轮作为生态系统工程师:评估当前模型

IF 1.5 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOLOGY Palaios Pub Date : 2022-12-29 DOI:10.2110/palo.2022.012
Brittany Laing, L. Buatois, M. Mángano, N. Minter, L. Strotz, G. Narbonne, G. Brock
{"title":"生物涡轮作为生态系统工程师:评估当前模型","authors":"Brittany Laing, L. Buatois, M. Mángano, N. Minter, L. Strotz, G. Narbonne, G. Brock","doi":"10.2110/palo.2022.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: Bioturbating organisms can dramatically alter the physical, chemical, and hydrological properties of the sediment and promote or hinder microbial growth. They are a classic example of “ecosystem engineers” as they alter the availability of resources to other species. Multiple evolutionary hypotheses evoke bioturbation as a possible driver for historical ecological change. To test these hypotheses, researchers need reliable and reproducible methods for estimating the impact of bioturbation in ancient environments. Early efforts to record and compare this impact through geologic time focused on the degree of bioturbation (e.g., bioturbation indices), the depth of bioturbation (e.g., bioturbation depth), or the structure of the infaunal community (e.g., tiering, ecospace utilization). Models which combine several parameters (e.g., functional groups, tier, motility, sediment interaction style) have been proposed and applied across the geological timescale in recent years. Here, we review all models that characterize the impact of bioturbators on the sedimentary environment (i.e., ‘ecosystem engineering’), in both modern and fossil sediments, and propose several questions. What are the assumptions of each approach? Are the current models appropriate for the metrics they wish to measure? Are they robust and reproducible? Our review highlights the nature of the sedimentary environment as an important parameter when characterizing ecosystem engineering intensity and outlines considerations for a best-practice model to measure the impact of bioturbation in geological datasets.","PeriodicalId":54647,"journal":{"name":"Palaios","volume":"37 1","pages":"718 - 730"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BIOTURBATORS AS ECOSYSTEM ENGINEERS: ASSESSING CURRENT MODELS\",\"authors\":\"Brittany Laing, L. Buatois, M. Mángano, N. Minter, L. Strotz, G. Narbonne, G. Brock\",\"doi\":\"10.2110/palo.2022.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT: Bioturbating organisms can dramatically alter the physical, chemical, and hydrological properties of the sediment and promote or hinder microbial growth. They are a classic example of “ecosystem engineers” as they alter the availability of resources to other species. Multiple evolutionary hypotheses evoke bioturbation as a possible driver for historical ecological change. To test these hypotheses, researchers need reliable and reproducible methods for estimating the impact of bioturbation in ancient environments. Early efforts to record and compare this impact through geologic time focused on the degree of bioturbation (e.g., bioturbation indices), the depth of bioturbation (e.g., bioturbation depth), or the structure of the infaunal community (e.g., tiering, ecospace utilization). Models which combine several parameters (e.g., functional groups, tier, motility, sediment interaction style) have been proposed and applied across the geological timescale in recent years. Here, we review all models that characterize the impact of bioturbators on the sedimentary environment (i.e., ‘ecosystem engineering’), in both modern and fossil sediments, and propose several questions. What are the assumptions of each approach? Are the current models appropriate for the metrics they wish to measure? Are they robust and reproducible? Our review highlights the nature of the sedimentary environment as an important parameter when characterizing ecosystem engineering intensity and outlines considerations for a best-practice model to measure the impact of bioturbation in geological datasets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palaios\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"718 - 730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palaios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2110/palo.2022.012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palaios","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2110/palo.2022.012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:扰动生物可以显著改变沉积物的物理、化学和水文性质,促进或阻碍微生物的生长。它们是“生态系统工程师”的典型例子,因为它们改变了其他物种的资源可用性。多种进化假说唤起生物扰动作为历史生态变化的可能驱动力。为了验证这些假设,研究人员需要可靠和可重复的方法来估计古代环境中生物扰动的影响。早期通过地质时间记录和比较这种影响的努力集中在生物扰动程度(例如,生物扰动指数)、生物扰动深度(例如,生物扰动深度)或动物群落结构(例如,分层、生态空间利用)上。近年来,结合多个参数(如官能团、层、运动、沉积物相互作用类型)的模型被提出并应用于多个地质时间尺度。在这里,我们回顾了现代和化石沉积物中表征生物扰动器对沉积环境影响的所有模型(即“生态系统工程”),并提出了几个问题。每种方法的假设是什么?当前的模型是否适合于它们想要度量的指标?它们是否健壮且可复制?我们的综述强调了沉积环境的性质是表征生态系统工程强度的一个重要参数,并概述了在地质数据集中测量生物扰动影响的最佳实践模型的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BIOTURBATORS AS ECOSYSTEM ENGINEERS: ASSESSING CURRENT MODELS
ABSTRACT: Bioturbating organisms can dramatically alter the physical, chemical, and hydrological properties of the sediment and promote or hinder microbial growth. They are a classic example of “ecosystem engineers” as they alter the availability of resources to other species. Multiple evolutionary hypotheses evoke bioturbation as a possible driver for historical ecological change. To test these hypotheses, researchers need reliable and reproducible methods for estimating the impact of bioturbation in ancient environments. Early efforts to record and compare this impact through geologic time focused on the degree of bioturbation (e.g., bioturbation indices), the depth of bioturbation (e.g., bioturbation depth), or the structure of the infaunal community (e.g., tiering, ecospace utilization). Models which combine several parameters (e.g., functional groups, tier, motility, sediment interaction style) have been proposed and applied across the geological timescale in recent years. Here, we review all models that characterize the impact of bioturbators on the sedimentary environment (i.e., ‘ecosystem engineering’), in both modern and fossil sediments, and propose several questions. What are the assumptions of each approach? Are the current models appropriate for the metrics they wish to measure? Are they robust and reproducible? Our review highlights the nature of the sedimentary environment as an important parameter when characterizing ecosystem engineering intensity and outlines considerations for a best-practice model to measure the impact of bioturbation in geological datasets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palaios
Palaios 地学-地质学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: PALAIOS is a monthly journal, founded in 1986, dedicated to emphasizing the impact of life on Earth''s history as recorded in the paleontological and sedimentological records. PALAIOS disseminates information to an international spectrum of geologists and biologists interested in a broad range of topics, including, but not limited to, biogeochemistry, ichnology, paleoclimatology, paleoecology, paleoceanography, sedimentology, stratigraphy, geomicrobiology, paleobiogeochemistry, and astrobiology. PALAIOS publishes original papers that emphasize using paleontology to answer important geological and biological questions that further our understanding of Earth history. Accordingly, manuscripts whose subject matter and conclusions have broader geologic implications are much more likely to be selected for publication. Given that the purpose of PALAIOS is to generate enthusiasm for paleontology among a broad spectrum of readers, the editors request the following: titles that generate immediate interest; abstracts that emphasize important conclusions; illustrations of professional caliber used in place of words; and lively, yet scholarly, text.
期刊最新文献
NEW QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTORS (SHAPE AND MACROBORING) OF BIOGENIC NODULES: EXAMPLES FROM THE LESSER ANTILLES AND NEW ZEALAND LOCOMOTION TRACES EMPLACED BY MODERN STALKLESS COMATULID CRINOIDS (FEATHERSTARS) A FOSSIL FOREST FROM ITALY REVEALS THAT WETLAND CONIFERS THRIVED IN EARLY PERMIAN PERI-TETHYAN PANGEA TAPHONOMY OF TINY TETRAPOD TRACKS IN AN EXAMPLE FROM THE LOWER PERMIAN (CISURALIAN) SŁUPIEC FORMATION (SW POLAND) PLANT COMMUNITY CHANGE ACROSS THE PALEOCENE–EOCENE BOUNDARY IN THE GULF COASTAL PLAIN, CENTRAL TEXAS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1