绿色之星SA信用在南非绿色建筑中的应用趋势

IF 0.6 Q4 MANAGEMENT Acta Structilia Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.18820/24150487/as27i2.1
D. Hoffman, Ling Huang, J. V. Rensburg, Amy Yorke-Hart
{"title":"绿色之星SA信用在南非绿色建筑中的应用趋势","authors":"D. Hoffman, Ling Huang, J. V. Rensburg, Amy Yorke-Hart","doi":"10.18820/24150487/as27i2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The South African green building industry is growing towards maturity. Stakeholders need to observe, document, and be informed about trends and development of the industry. This article evaluates whether application trends have emerged of often achieved and seldom achieved Green Star SA credits by all new office buildings that received a Green Star SA rating between 2009 and 2015 in South Africa. Any observed trends are further described by aspects such as the categories of the Green Star SA tool and the Green Star SA rating achieved. The article considers the data of 95 office buildings, made available by the Green Building Council of South Africa (GBCSA). A quantatitive research approach is used to investigate the use frequency of every credit in the Green Star SA tool and to identify trends in credit use. The study finds that 21 of the 67 credits are achieved on average by >80% of the certified projects. Another 14 credits have an average achievement rate of <20%. The nine categories of the Green Star SA tool also varies from average achievements of 84% for Water to only 19% for Innovation. The Green Star SA rating level is also found to be positively correlated to often used credits and negatively correlated to seldom used credits. This article observes industry-wide trends Acta Structilia 2020: 27(2) 2 with the potential to negatively affect the ability of green buildings to deliver the required sustainability outcomes expected of them. This finding and the potential outcome thereof need to be monitored and managed by stakeholders such as the GBCSA.","PeriodicalId":42571,"journal":{"name":"Acta Structilia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in application of Green Star SA credits in South African green building\",\"authors\":\"D. Hoffman, Ling Huang, J. V. Rensburg, Amy Yorke-Hart\",\"doi\":\"10.18820/24150487/as27i2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The South African green building industry is growing towards maturity. Stakeholders need to observe, document, and be informed about trends and development of the industry. This article evaluates whether application trends have emerged of often achieved and seldom achieved Green Star SA credits by all new office buildings that received a Green Star SA rating between 2009 and 2015 in South Africa. Any observed trends are further described by aspects such as the categories of the Green Star SA tool and the Green Star SA rating achieved. The article considers the data of 95 office buildings, made available by the Green Building Council of South Africa (GBCSA). A quantatitive research approach is used to investigate the use frequency of every credit in the Green Star SA tool and to identify trends in credit use. The study finds that 21 of the 67 credits are achieved on average by >80% of the certified projects. Another 14 credits have an average achievement rate of <20%. The nine categories of the Green Star SA tool also varies from average achievements of 84% for Water to only 19% for Innovation. The Green Star SA rating level is also found to be positively correlated to often used credits and negatively correlated to seldom used credits. This article observes industry-wide trends Acta Structilia 2020: 27(2) 2 with the potential to negatively affect the ability of green buildings to deliver the required sustainability outcomes expected of them. This finding and the potential outcome thereof need to be monitored and managed by stakeholders such as the GBCSA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Structilia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Structilia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18820/24150487/as27i2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Structilia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/24150487/as27i2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

南非的绿色建筑业正在走向成熟。利益相关者需要观察、记录并了解行业的趋势和发展。本文评估了2009年至2015年期间,南非所有获得绿星SA评级的新办公楼是否出现了经常获得和很少获得的绿星SA信用的应用趋势。任何观察到的趋势都通过诸如绿星SA工具的类别和获得的绿星SA评级等方面来进一步描述。本文考虑了南非绿色建筑委员会(GBCSA)提供的95栋办公楼的数据。定量研究方法用于调查Green Star SA工具中每个信贷的使用频率,并确定信贷使用的趋势。研究发现,在67个学分中,平均有21个学分是由超过80%的认证项目获得的。另外14个学分的平均完成率低于20%。绿星SA工具的九个类别也各不相同,从水务的平均成绩84%到创新的平均成绩只有19%。绿星SA评级水平也与经常使用的信用呈正相关,与很少使用的信用呈负相关。本文观察了全行业的趋势Acta Structilia 2020:27(2)2,这可能会对绿色建筑实现所需可持续性成果的能力产生负面影响。这一发现及其潜在结果需要由利益相关者(如GBCSA)进行监测和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends in application of Green Star SA credits in South African green building
The South African green building industry is growing towards maturity. Stakeholders need to observe, document, and be informed about trends and development of the industry. This article evaluates whether application trends have emerged of often achieved and seldom achieved Green Star SA credits by all new office buildings that received a Green Star SA rating between 2009 and 2015 in South Africa. Any observed trends are further described by aspects such as the categories of the Green Star SA tool and the Green Star SA rating achieved. The article considers the data of 95 office buildings, made available by the Green Building Council of South Africa (GBCSA). A quantatitive research approach is used to investigate the use frequency of every credit in the Green Star SA tool and to identify trends in credit use. The study finds that 21 of the 67 credits are achieved on average by >80% of the certified projects. Another 14 credits have an average achievement rate of <20%. The nine categories of the Green Star SA tool also varies from average achievements of 84% for Water to only 19% for Innovation. The Green Star SA rating level is also found to be positively correlated to often used credits and negatively correlated to seldom used credits. This article observes industry-wide trends Acta Structilia 2020: 27(2) 2 with the potential to negatively affect the ability of green buildings to deliver the required sustainability outcomes expected of them. This finding and the potential outcome thereof need to be monitored and managed by stakeholders such as the GBCSA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Structilia
Acta Structilia MANAGEMENT-
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optimisation of labour-intensive productivity for construction projects in Ghana Labour productivity in construction SMEs: Perspectives from South Africa Predictors of corruption among town planners: A Nigerian case study Impact of urban renewal changes on urban landscape identity: Case study of Kisumu City, Kenya A conceptual quality improvement protocol for Free State public works projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1