西非稀树草原林地四种主要木本植物地下生物量的异速生长方程

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Silva Fennica Pub Date : 2017-05-22 DOI:10.14214/SF.1631
J. Koala, L. Sawadogo, P. Savadogo, E. Aynekulu, J. Heiskanen, M. Said
{"title":"西非稀树草原林地四种主要木本植物地下生物量的异速生长方程","authors":"J. Koala, L. Sawadogo, P. Savadogo, E. Aynekulu, J. Heiskanen, M. Said","doi":"10.14214/SF.1631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate estimates of both above-ground biomass (AGB) and below-ground biomass (BGB) are essential for estimating carbon (C) balances at various geographical scales and formulating effective climate change mitigation programs. However, estimating BGB is challenging, particularly for forest ecosystems, so robust allometric equations are needed. To obtain such equations for savanna-woodlands of the West African north sudanian zone, we selected four common native woody species (Anogeissus leiocarpa (DC.) Guill. & Perr., Detarium microcarpum Guill. & Perr., Piliostigma thonningii (Schumach.) Milne-Redh. and Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn.). At two sites in Burkina Faso, we determined the BGB of 30 trees of each of these species by excavation, and measured various above-ground dimensional variables. The root:shoot ratio varied widely among the species, from 0.1 to 3.4. Depending on the species, allometric equations based on stem basal area at 20 cm height, basal area at breast height and tree height explained 50–95% of the variation in BGB. The best generic equation we obtained, based on basal area at 20 cm, explained 60% of the variation in BGB across the species. Three previously published generic allometric equations underestimated BGB by 8 to 63%. The presented equations should significantly improve the accuracy of BGB estimates in savanna-woodlands and help avoid costly needs to excavate root systems.","PeriodicalId":49520,"journal":{"name":"Silva Fennica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allometric equations for below-ground biomass of four key woody species in West African savanna-woodlands\",\"authors\":\"J. Koala, L. Sawadogo, P. Savadogo, E. Aynekulu, J. Heiskanen, M. Said\",\"doi\":\"10.14214/SF.1631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurate estimates of both above-ground biomass (AGB) and below-ground biomass (BGB) are essential for estimating carbon (C) balances at various geographical scales and formulating effective climate change mitigation programs. However, estimating BGB is challenging, particularly for forest ecosystems, so robust allometric equations are needed. To obtain such equations for savanna-woodlands of the West African north sudanian zone, we selected four common native woody species (Anogeissus leiocarpa (DC.) Guill. & Perr., Detarium microcarpum Guill. & Perr., Piliostigma thonningii (Schumach.) Milne-Redh. and Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn.). At two sites in Burkina Faso, we determined the BGB of 30 trees of each of these species by excavation, and measured various above-ground dimensional variables. The root:shoot ratio varied widely among the species, from 0.1 to 3.4. Depending on the species, allometric equations based on stem basal area at 20 cm height, basal area at breast height and tree height explained 50–95% of the variation in BGB. The best generic equation we obtained, based on basal area at 20 cm, explained 60% of the variation in BGB across the species. Three previously published generic allometric equations underestimated BGB by 8 to 63%. The presented equations should significantly improve the accuracy of BGB estimates in savanna-woodlands and help avoid costly needs to excavate root systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Silva Fennica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Silva Fennica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14214/SF.1631\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Silva Fennica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14214/SF.1631","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

准确估算地上生物量(AGB)和地下生物量(BGB)对于估算不同地理尺度上的碳(C)平衡和制定有效的气候变化减缓计划至关重要。然而,估算BGB具有挑战性,特别是对于森林生态系统,因此需要稳健的异速生长方程。为了得到西非北苏丹地区稀树草原林地的这种方程,我们选择了4种常见的本地木本物种(Anogeissus leiocarpa, DC.)。Guill。&穗青葱。细木纹细木纹。&穗青葱。,毛柱头thonningii(舒马赫)Milne-Redh。和黄芪(Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn.)。在布基纳法索的两个地点,我们通过挖掘确定了每种树种的30棵树的BGB,并测量了各种地上维度变量。根冠比在不同树种间差异很大,在0.1 ~ 3.4之间。根据不同树种,基于茎基部20 cm高度、胸脯高度和树高的异速生长方程解释了BGB变异的50-95%。我们得到的最好的通用方程,基于20厘米的基底面积,解释了物种间60%的BGB差异。三个先前发表的通用异速生长方程低估了BGB的8%至63%。所提出的方程将显著提高稀树草原林地BGB估算的准确性,并有助于避免昂贵的根系挖掘需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Allometric equations for below-ground biomass of four key woody species in West African savanna-woodlands
Accurate estimates of both above-ground biomass (AGB) and below-ground biomass (BGB) are essential for estimating carbon (C) balances at various geographical scales and formulating effective climate change mitigation programs. However, estimating BGB is challenging, particularly for forest ecosystems, so robust allometric equations are needed. To obtain such equations for savanna-woodlands of the West African north sudanian zone, we selected four common native woody species (Anogeissus leiocarpa (DC.) Guill. & Perr., Detarium microcarpum Guill. & Perr., Piliostigma thonningii (Schumach.) Milne-Redh. and Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn.). At two sites in Burkina Faso, we determined the BGB of 30 trees of each of these species by excavation, and measured various above-ground dimensional variables. The root:shoot ratio varied widely among the species, from 0.1 to 3.4. Depending on the species, allometric equations based on stem basal area at 20 cm height, basal area at breast height and tree height explained 50–95% of the variation in BGB. The best generic equation we obtained, based on basal area at 20 cm, explained 60% of the variation in BGB across the species. Three previously published generic allometric equations underestimated BGB by 8 to 63%. The presented equations should significantly improve the accuracy of BGB estimates in savanna-woodlands and help avoid costly needs to excavate root systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Silva Fennica
Silva Fennica 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Silva Fennica publishes significant new knowledge on forest sciences. The scope covers research on forestry and forest ecosystems. Silva Fennica aims to increase understanding on forest ecosystems, and sustainable use and conservation of forest resources. Use of forest resources includes all aspects of forestry containing biomass-based and non-timber products, economic and social factors etc.
期刊最新文献
Passion for science Effect of arginine-phosphate addition on early survival and growth of Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch Forest management in northern Fennoscandia: the need for solutions that mitigate conflicts during forest regeneration and increase the use of continuous cover forestry Changing climatic drivers of European spruce bark beetle outbreaks: a comparison of locations around the Northern Baltic Sea Within-site adaptation: Growth and mortality of Norway spruce, Scots pine and Silver birch seedlings in different planting positions across a soil moisture gradient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1