更多的是私人而非公共:选择社区倡议是丹佛州太阳谷社区国家主导的绅士化的另一个工具

IF 2.9 2区 经济学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Urban Geography Pub Date : 2023-03-17 DOI:10.1080/02723638.2023.2185384
Jeremy Auerbach, Jordin Clark, Carrie Makarewicz, Solange Muñoz, Marisa Westbrook
{"title":"更多的是私人而非公共:选择社区倡议是丹佛州太阳谷社区国家主导的绅士化的另一个工具","authors":"Jeremy Auerbach, Jordin Clark, Carrie Makarewicz, Solange Muñoz, Marisa Westbrook","doi":"10.1080/02723638.2023.2185384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Through the Choice Neighborhoods Initiative (CNI), private investors and developers replace distressed US public housing with new mixed-income and mixed-use developments. Although these projects promote community involvement and are purported to prioritize community input and to benefit residents, private investors have disproportionate power and often modify redevelopment to favor the market-rate units while receiving tax incentives, extremely low-cost and long-term land-leases, and government funds for demolition, construction, maintenance, and management. Through a CNI program in Denver (US) we identify and examine the hardships experienced by its residents. CNI transitioned residents toward modern living amenities and mixed-income arrangements but with a loss of community and negatively impacted residents’ mental and physical health. Our initial findings highlight how this regeneration process can lead to degeneration, displacement, fragmented communities, and poor health outcomes for residents. Federal and local agencies should commit to programs that ensures collaborative community-centred planning from beginning to end.","PeriodicalId":48178,"journal":{"name":"Urban Geography","volume":"44 1","pages":"1035 - 1049"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More private than public: the choice neighborhoods initiative as another tool for state-led gentrification in the Sun Valley neighborhood of Denver CO\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Auerbach, Jordin Clark, Carrie Makarewicz, Solange Muñoz, Marisa Westbrook\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02723638.2023.2185384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Through the Choice Neighborhoods Initiative (CNI), private investors and developers replace distressed US public housing with new mixed-income and mixed-use developments. Although these projects promote community involvement and are purported to prioritize community input and to benefit residents, private investors have disproportionate power and often modify redevelopment to favor the market-rate units while receiving tax incentives, extremely low-cost and long-term land-leases, and government funds for demolition, construction, maintenance, and management. Through a CNI program in Denver (US) we identify and examine the hardships experienced by its residents. CNI transitioned residents toward modern living amenities and mixed-income arrangements but with a loss of community and negatively impacted residents’ mental and physical health. Our initial findings highlight how this regeneration process can lead to degeneration, displacement, fragmented communities, and poor health outcomes for residents. Federal and local agencies should commit to programs that ensures collaborative community-centred planning from beginning to end.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Geography\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"1035 - 1049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2023.2185384\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Geography","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2023.2185384","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:通过“选择邻里倡议”(CNI),私人投资者和开发商用新的混合收入和混合用途开发项目取代了陷入困境的美国公共住房。尽管这些项目促进了社区参与,旨在优先考虑社区投入并使居民受益,但私人投资者拥有不成比例的权力,经常修改重建以支持市场价格的单元,同时获得税收优惠、极低成本和长期的土地租赁,以及政府用于拆迁、建设、维护和管理的资金。通过CNI在丹佛(美国)的一个项目,我们发现并检查了其居民所经历的困难。CNI使居民转向现代生活设施和混合收入安排,但失去了社区,对居民的身心健康产生了负面影响。我们的初步发现强调了这种再生过程如何导致退化、流离失所、社区支离破碎和居民健康状况不佳。联邦和地方机构应致力于确保自始至终以社区为中心的合作规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
More private than public: the choice neighborhoods initiative as another tool for state-led gentrification in the Sun Valley neighborhood of Denver CO
ABSTRACT Through the Choice Neighborhoods Initiative (CNI), private investors and developers replace distressed US public housing with new mixed-income and mixed-use developments. Although these projects promote community involvement and are purported to prioritize community input and to benefit residents, private investors have disproportionate power and often modify redevelopment to favor the market-rate units while receiving tax incentives, extremely low-cost and long-term land-leases, and government funds for demolition, construction, maintenance, and management. Through a CNI program in Denver (US) we identify and examine the hardships experienced by its residents. CNI transitioned residents toward modern living amenities and mixed-income arrangements but with a loss of community and negatively impacted residents’ mental and physical health. Our initial findings highlight how this regeneration process can lead to degeneration, displacement, fragmented communities, and poor health outcomes for residents. Federal and local agencies should commit to programs that ensures collaborative community-centred planning from beginning to end.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Geography
Urban Geography Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Editorial Policy. Urban Geography publishes research articles covering a wide range of topics and approaches of interest to urban geographers. Articles should be relevant, timely, and well-designed, should have broad significance, and should demonstrate originality.
期刊最新文献
“Regarding the pain of others”: urban geography after empathy Rental sector liberalization and the housing outcomes for young urban adults Included or left behind? Residents’ perceptions on public investments, city growth, and local decision-making Animating the urban: between infrastructure and encounter Contemporary urban employment patterns among Chinese peasant workers in the 2020s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1