与肩袖相关的肩痛。描述在家锻炼的依从性和使用行为改变干预措施促进在家锻炼依从性:随机对照试验的系统综述

IF 0.8 Q4 REHABILITATION Physical Therapy Reviews Pub Date : 2021-07-22 DOI:10.1080/10833196.2021.1935106
K. Hall, A. Grinstead, Jeremy S. Lewis, C. Mercer, A. Moore, C. Ridehalgh
{"title":"与肩袖相关的肩痛。描述在家锻炼的依从性和使用行为改变干预措施促进在家锻炼依从性:随机对照试验的系统综述","authors":"K. Hall, A. Grinstead, Jeremy S. Lewis, C. Mercer, A. Moore, C. Ridehalgh","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2021.1935106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background A home exercise program (HEP) is integral in the management of rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP). There are many methods of measuring HEP adherence and many possible interventions to promote HEP adherence. Understanding the adherence rates to HEP and the strategies used to promote HEP adherence is important in order to interpret the existing evidence for the use of HEP in the management of RCRSP. Objectives To report and synthesize home exercise adherence and strategies to promote home exercise adherence in order to understand the limitations of the current evidence base and make recommendations for clinical practice and future research investigating HEPs in the management of RCRSP. Methods An electronic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, AMED, and CENTRAL was undertaken. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0, and BC techniques were coded in accordance with the BC technique taxonomy (version 1). Results Seventeen RCTs were retrieved. Forty-seven percent described a formal method of measuring HEP adherence and 29% described adherence rates. The included studies described between three and seventeen BC techniques and the mean number of BC techniques per study was 5.8. Twelve percent of the studies described offering patients an explanation of how the exercise program might help their symptoms resolve. Conclusions Poor reporting of adherence and the underutilisation of BC interventions to promote HEP adherence was prevalent. Recommendations for clinicians and researchers include more widespread use and definitive reporting of BC techniques to promote adherence, and the use of objective, patient self-reported, and clinician-assessed measures of adherence when prescribing HEPs.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10833196.2021.1935106","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rotator cuff related shoulder pain. Describing home exercise adherence and the use of behavior change interventions to promote home exercise adherence: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"K. Hall, A. Grinstead, Jeremy S. Lewis, C. Mercer, A. Moore, C. Ridehalgh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10833196.2021.1935106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background A home exercise program (HEP) is integral in the management of rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP). There are many methods of measuring HEP adherence and many possible interventions to promote HEP adherence. Understanding the adherence rates to HEP and the strategies used to promote HEP adherence is important in order to interpret the existing evidence for the use of HEP in the management of RCRSP. Objectives To report and synthesize home exercise adherence and strategies to promote home exercise adherence in order to understand the limitations of the current evidence base and make recommendations for clinical practice and future research investigating HEPs in the management of RCRSP. Methods An electronic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, AMED, and CENTRAL was undertaken. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0, and BC techniques were coded in accordance with the BC technique taxonomy (version 1). Results Seventeen RCTs were retrieved. Forty-seven percent described a formal method of measuring HEP adherence and 29% described adherence rates. The included studies described between three and seventeen BC techniques and the mean number of BC techniques per study was 5.8. Twelve percent of the studies described offering patients an explanation of how the exercise program might help their symptoms resolve. Conclusions Poor reporting of adherence and the underutilisation of BC interventions to promote HEP adherence was prevalent. Recommendations for clinicians and researchers include more widespread use and definitive reporting of BC techniques to promote adherence, and the use of objective, patient self-reported, and clinician-assessed measures of adherence when prescribing HEPs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10833196.2021.1935106\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2021.1935106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2021.1935106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要背景家庭锻炼计划(HEP)是治疗肩袖相关肩痛(RCRSP)不可或缺的一部分。有许多方法可以测量HEP的依从性,也有许多可能的干预措施来促进HEP的顺应性。了解HEP的依从率和用于促进HEP依从性的策略对于解释在RCRSP管理中使用HEP的现有证据非常重要。目的报告和综合家庭锻炼依从性和促进家庭锻炼依从的策略,以了解当前证据基础的局限性,并为临床实践和未来研究研究HEPs在RCRSP管理中的应用提出建议。方法对EMBASE、MEDLINE、PubMed、CINAHL、AMED和CENTRAL进行电子检索。使用Cochrane RoB 2.0评估方法学质量,并根据BC技术分类法(第1版)对BC技术进行编码。结果检索到17份随机对照试验。47%描述了测量HEP依从性的正式方法,29%描述了依从率。纳入的研究描述了公元前3至17种技术,每次研究的平均公元前技术数量为5.8。12%的研究描述了向患者解释运动计划如何帮助他们解决症状。结论对依从性的报告不足以及BC干预措施在促进HEP依从性方面的利用不足是普遍存在的。对临床医生和研究人员的建议包括更广泛地使用和明确报告BC技术来促进依从性,以及在开HEP时使用客观的、患者自我报告的和临床医生评估的依从性指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rotator cuff related shoulder pain. Describing home exercise adherence and the use of behavior change interventions to promote home exercise adherence: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Abstract Background A home exercise program (HEP) is integral in the management of rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP). There are many methods of measuring HEP adherence and many possible interventions to promote HEP adherence. Understanding the adherence rates to HEP and the strategies used to promote HEP adherence is important in order to interpret the existing evidence for the use of HEP in the management of RCRSP. Objectives To report and synthesize home exercise adherence and strategies to promote home exercise adherence in order to understand the limitations of the current evidence base and make recommendations for clinical practice and future research investigating HEPs in the management of RCRSP. Methods An electronic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, AMED, and CENTRAL was undertaken. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0, and BC techniques were coded in accordance with the BC technique taxonomy (version 1). Results Seventeen RCTs were retrieved. Forty-seven percent described a formal method of measuring HEP adherence and 29% described adherence rates. The included studies described between three and seventeen BC techniques and the mean number of BC techniques per study was 5.8. Twelve percent of the studies described offering patients an explanation of how the exercise program might help their symptoms resolve. Conclusions Poor reporting of adherence and the underutilisation of BC interventions to promote HEP adherence was prevalent. Recommendations for clinicians and researchers include more widespread use and definitive reporting of BC techniques to promote adherence, and the use of objective, patient self-reported, and clinician-assessed measures of adherence when prescribing HEPs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy Reviews
Physical Therapy Reviews REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy Reviews is an international journal which aims to publish contemporary reviews, discussion papers and editorials within physical therapy, and in those basic and clinical sciences which are the basis of physical therapy. The journal is aimed at all those involved in research, teaching and practice within the area of physical therapy. Reviews (both descriptive and systematic) are invited in the following areas, which reflect the breadth and diversity of practice within physical therapy: •neurological rehabilitation •movement and exercise •orthopaedics and rheumatology •manual therapy and massage •sports medicine •measurement •chest physiotherapy •electrotherapeutics •obstetrics and gynaecology •complementary therapies •professional issues •musculoskeletal rehabilitation
期刊最新文献
The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of tests used to assess the effects of power training in older adults: a systematic review Physical therapy treatment interventions and the effects thereof on clinical outcomes when addressing intra-pleural abnormalities in patients with trauma: protocol for a systematic review Motivational modulation enhances movement performance in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review What influences patient decision making after anterior cruciate ligament injury in Australia; an internet survey What is the contribution of latissimus dorsi to trunk movement and control? A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1