数字合作社作为协作经济背景下的数字工作渠道

Francisco Javier Arrieta Idiakez
{"title":"数字合作社作为协作经济背景下的数字工作渠道","authors":"Francisco Javier Arrieta Idiakez","doi":"10.18543/BAIDC-54-2019PP75-96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present different bodies, associations, platforms etc. vary greatly in their definitions of the collaborative economy. This is because there are many differences between models and platforms within the term ‘collaborative economy’. Taking this diversity into account, this study will focus on the platforms dedicated to the provision of services. The first major issue will be the need to delimit and establish links between a multitude of concepts that emerge within the so-called collaborative economy, such as the Gig economy and the On-demand economy. The ultimate purpose is to limit the concept of collaborative economy for the purposes of the research carried out here. It was not for nothing that the European Commission recommended that legislators and courts should review professional regimes in the context of the new economy, while expressing its clear support for collaborative economy platforms in its report ‘A European agenda for the collaborative economy’ (2016). There is therefore a need to address the modality of platform-based work (also called digital work), with the aim of ensuring that standards are upheld regarding the working conditions and social protection of people who provide their services under this modality. This study, then, analyses the challenges, and positive and negative aspects of this new situation. The main conclusion is that cooperatives are the best means to channel the collaborative economy, under the modalities of platform-based or digital work. This will require studying and analysing the new models of cooperatives, and advocating digital cooperatives, outside the so-called cooperatives of self-employed workers, the true cooperative character of which is often doubtful. The conceptual delimitation of digital cooperatives and their differentiation from ‘classic’ cooperatives will also be discussed, which will involve providing some insights into the characteristic features of digital cooperatives. This research uses the descriptive, comparative and propositional legal methods. The descriptive method is used to define the concept of collaborative economy and the sub-concepts that it includes in terms of the provision of services; and to identify new forms of platform-based or digital work, and delimit the field of action of digital cooperatives, as the most appropriate means to channel these new forms of work. The comparative method will be useful to analyse the various existing professional regimes that can accommodate the new forms of work available within the collaborative economy. Finally, the propositional method will argue that digital cooperatives are the best solution to shape work within the collaborative economy.Received: 27 November 2018Accepted: 07 March 2019Published online: 22 July 2019","PeriodicalId":41666,"journal":{"name":"Boletin de la Asociacion Internacional de Derecho Cooperativo-International Association of Cooperative Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital cooperatives as channels for digital work in the context of the collaborative economy\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Javier Arrieta Idiakez\",\"doi\":\"10.18543/BAIDC-54-2019PP75-96\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At present different bodies, associations, platforms etc. vary greatly in their definitions of the collaborative economy. This is because there are many differences between models and platforms within the term ‘collaborative economy’. Taking this diversity into account, this study will focus on the platforms dedicated to the provision of services. The first major issue will be the need to delimit and establish links between a multitude of concepts that emerge within the so-called collaborative economy, such as the Gig economy and the On-demand economy. The ultimate purpose is to limit the concept of collaborative economy for the purposes of the research carried out here. It was not for nothing that the European Commission recommended that legislators and courts should review professional regimes in the context of the new economy, while expressing its clear support for collaborative economy platforms in its report ‘A European agenda for the collaborative economy’ (2016). There is therefore a need to address the modality of platform-based work (also called digital work), with the aim of ensuring that standards are upheld regarding the working conditions and social protection of people who provide their services under this modality. This study, then, analyses the challenges, and positive and negative aspects of this new situation. The main conclusion is that cooperatives are the best means to channel the collaborative economy, under the modalities of platform-based or digital work. This will require studying and analysing the new models of cooperatives, and advocating digital cooperatives, outside the so-called cooperatives of self-employed workers, the true cooperative character of which is often doubtful. The conceptual delimitation of digital cooperatives and their differentiation from ‘classic’ cooperatives will also be discussed, which will involve providing some insights into the characteristic features of digital cooperatives. This research uses the descriptive, comparative and propositional legal methods. The descriptive method is used to define the concept of collaborative economy and the sub-concepts that it includes in terms of the provision of services; and to identify new forms of platform-based or digital work, and delimit the field of action of digital cooperatives, as the most appropriate means to channel these new forms of work. The comparative method will be useful to analyse the various existing professional regimes that can accommodate the new forms of work available within the collaborative economy. Finally, the propositional method will argue that digital cooperatives are the best solution to shape work within the collaborative economy.Received: 27 November 2018Accepted: 07 March 2019Published online: 22 July 2019\",\"PeriodicalId\":41666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boletin de la Asociacion Internacional de Derecho Cooperativo-International Association of Cooperative Law Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boletin de la Asociacion Internacional de Derecho Cooperativo-International Association of Cooperative Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18543/BAIDC-54-2019PP75-96\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletin de la Asociacion Internacional de Derecho Cooperativo-International Association of Cooperative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/BAIDC-54-2019PP75-96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目前,不同的机构、协会、平台等对合作经济的定义差异很大。这是因为在“协作经济”一词中,模型和平台之间存在许多差异。考虑到这种多样性,本研究将重点关注专门提供服务的平台。第一个主要问题是需要在所谓的协作经济中出现的众多概念之间划定界限并建立联系,例如Gig经济和随需应变经济。最终目的是为了在这里进行研究而限制合作经济的概念。欧盟委员会建议立法者和法院在新经济背景下审查专业制度,同时在其报告《欧洲合作经济议程》(2016)中明确支持合作经济平台,这并非没有原因。因此,有必要解决基于平台的工作模式(也称为数字工作),目的是确保在这种模式下提供服务的人的工作条件和社会保护方面的标准得到维护。然后,本研究分析了这种新情况的挑战以及积极和消极方面。主要结论是,在基于平台或数字工作的模式下,合作社是引导合作经济的最佳手段。这将需要研究和分析合作社的新模式,并在所谓的自营职业者合作社之外倡导数字合作社,而自营职业者的真正合作社性质往往令人怀疑。还将讨论数字合作社的概念界定及其与“经典”合作社的区别,其中包括对数字合作社的特征提供一些见解。本研究采用了描述性、比较性和命题性的法律方法。描述性方法用于定义合作经济的概念及其在提供服务方面包含的子概念;确定基于平台或数字工作的新形式,并界定数字合作社的行动领域,作为引导这些新工作形式的最适当手段。比较方法将有助于分析现有的各种专业制度,这些制度可以适应合作经济中现有的新工作形式。最后,命题方法将认为数字合作社是在协作经济中塑造工作的最佳解决方案。接收日期:2018年11月27日接受日期:2019年3月7日在线发布时间:2019年7月22日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital cooperatives as channels for digital work in the context of the collaborative economy
At present different bodies, associations, platforms etc. vary greatly in their definitions of the collaborative economy. This is because there are many differences between models and platforms within the term ‘collaborative economy’. Taking this diversity into account, this study will focus on the platforms dedicated to the provision of services. The first major issue will be the need to delimit and establish links between a multitude of concepts that emerge within the so-called collaborative economy, such as the Gig economy and the On-demand economy. The ultimate purpose is to limit the concept of collaborative economy for the purposes of the research carried out here. It was not for nothing that the European Commission recommended that legislators and courts should review professional regimes in the context of the new economy, while expressing its clear support for collaborative economy platforms in its report ‘A European agenda for the collaborative economy’ (2016). There is therefore a need to address the modality of platform-based work (also called digital work), with the aim of ensuring that standards are upheld regarding the working conditions and social protection of people who provide their services under this modality. This study, then, analyses the challenges, and positive and negative aspects of this new situation. The main conclusion is that cooperatives are the best means to channel the collaborative economy, under the modalities of platform-based or digital work. This will require studying and analysing the new models of cooperatives, and advocating digital cooperatives, outside the so-called cooperatives of self-employed workers, the true cooperative character of which is often doubtful. The conceptual delimitation of digital cooperatives and their differentiation from ‘classic’ cooperatives will also be discussed, which will involve providing some insights into the characteristic features of digital cooperatives. This research uses the descriptive, comparative and propositional legal methods. The descriptive method is used to define the concept of collaborative economy and the sub-concepts that it includes in terms of the provision of services; and to identify new forms of platform-based or digital work, and delimit the field of action of digital cooperatives, as the most appropriate means to channel these new forms of work. The comparative method will be useful to analyse the various existing professional regimes that can accommodate the new forms of work available within the collaborative economy. Finally, the propositional method will argue that digital cooperatives are the best solution to shape work within the collaborative economy.Received: 27 November 2018Accepted: 07 March 2019Published online: 22 July 2019
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
75.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: El Boletín de la Asociación Internacional de Derecho Cooperativo (BAIDC) / International Association of Cooperative Law Journal (ISSN 1134-993X; e-ISSN 2386-4893) es una publicación científica que recoge en cada número los resultados de la investigación sobre un tema monográfico que cada año propone la Asamblea General de la AIDC, sin perjuicio de que también se publiquen artículos sobre otros temas relacionados con las cooperativas. Cuenta con la colaboración de un Grupo Internacional de Investigación en Derecho Cooperativo, que conforman profesores de universidades de Argentina, Costa Rica, Uruguay, Venezuela, México, Brasil, Cuba y España. El BAIDC es está incluido, entre otros, en los siguientes índices y bases de datos: Scopus, DICE, DOAJ- Directory of Open Access Journals, Latindex-Catalogob y CSIC.
期刊最新文献
Las cooperativas indígenas: entre los derechos a la autonomía y la libre determinación de los pueblos indígenas y su plan de vida La reconfiguración de la acción concertada reservada a la iniciativa no lucrativa basada en la regulación de los servicios de interés general de solidaridad Análisis del sabotaje de la Economía Social y de las cooperativas de ahorro y crédito en Ecuador Límites y contradicciones del Programa de Fomento a la Economía Social 2021-2024 en México Análisis de las estrategias implementadas desde la economía solidaria para la reactivación económica en el Distrito de Santa Marta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1