预测美国中西部大学校园内手机使用情况的因素

D. Kruger, Dóra Juhász, Claire Saunder, Stephanie L. Misevich, Ailiya Duan, Anna M. Heyblom, Camille V. Phaneuf
{"title":"预测美国中西部大学校园内手机使用情况的因素","authors":"D. Kruger, Dóra Juhász, Claire Saunder, Stephanie L. Misevich, Ailiya Duan, Anna M. Heyblom, Camille V. Phaneuf","doi":"10.22330/HEB/332/005-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cellphones are an integral part of life for many adults in technologically advanced societies. There is extensive research and literature on cellphones and social technology, with most studies conducted through self-report surveys, experience sampling, and system log data. Although selfreport survey methods are useful for examining how individuals perceive and feel about cellphone related issues, self-reported cellphone usage behavior is only moderately correlated with objective system log data. Naturalistic observations complement findings from self-report survey methods and may be the best method of objectively assessing both the patterns of and influences on cellphone use in real-world social contexts. Observers documented cellphone use among individuals (N = 4079) in seven public areas within or immediately surrounding a large public university campus in the Midwestern USA. Observers recorded whether or not individuals were using their cellphones, as well as individual’s sex, approximate age (undergraduate or older), group size, if the individual was engaged in live conversation with companions, and the prevailing weather conditions. Those engaged in live conversation were less likely to be using their cellphones than those who were not conversing with companions. Younger adults (those appearing to be in the typical undergraduate age range) were more likely to be using their cellphones than those who appeared older. Women were more likely to be using their cellphones than men. Phone use was higher in warmer weather than on colder days. Overall, this study demonstrates the value of observational studies for understanding technology use in social contexts.","PeriodicalId":91082,"journal":{"name":"Human ethology bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Predicting Observed Cellphone Use in a Midwestern USA University Campus Area\",\"authors\":\"D. Kruger, Dóra Juhász, Claire Saunder, Stephanie L. Misevich, Ailiya Duan, Anna M. Heyblom, Camille V. Phaneuf\",\"doi\":\"10.22330/HEB/332/005-012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cellphones are an integral part of life for many adults in technologically advanced societies. There is extensive research and literature on cellphones and social technology, with most studies conducted through self-report surveys, experience sampling, and system log data. Although selfreport survey methods are useful for examining how individuals perceive and feel about cellphone related issues, self-reported cellphone usage behavior is only moderately correlated with objective system log data. Naturalistic observations complement findings from self-report survey methods and may be the best method of objectively assessing both the patterns of and influences on cellphone use in real-world social contexts. Observers documented cellphone use among individuals (N = 4079) in seven public areas within or immediately surrounding a large public university campus in the Midwestern USA. Observers recorded whether or not individuals were using their cellphones, as well as individual’s sex, approximate age (undergraduate or older), group size, if the individual was engaged in live conversation with companions, and the prevailing weather conditions. Those engaged in live conversation were less likely to be using their cellphones than those who were not conversing with companions. Younger adults (those appearing to be in the typical undergraduate age range) were more likely to be using their cellphones than those who appeared older. Women were more likely to be using their cellphones than men. Phone use was higher in warmer weather than on colder days. Overall, this study demonstrates the value of observational studies for understanding technology use in social contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human ethology bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human ethology bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22330/HEB/332/005-012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human ethology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22330/HEB/332/005-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在科技发达的社会里,手机是许多成年人生活中不可或缺的一部分。关于手机和社交技术有广泛的研究和文献,大多数研究是通过自我报告调查、经验抽样和系统日志数据进行的。尽管自我报告调查方法对于检查个人如何感知和感受手机相关问题很有用,但自我报告的手机使用行为与客观系统日志数据只有适度的关联。自然主义观察补充了自我报告调查方法的发现,可能是客观评估现实社会环境中手机使用模式及其影响的最佳方法。观察人员记录了美国中西部一所大型公立大学校园内或周围七个公共区域的个人(N = 4079)使用手机的情况。观察人员记录了个人是否使用手机,以及个人的性别、大致年龄(本科或以上)、群体规模、个人是否与同伴进行实时交谈,以及当时的天气状况。与那些不与同伴交谈的人相比,那些参与现场交谈的人使用手机的可能性更小。年轻人(那些看起来在典型的大学生年龄范围内的人)比那些看起来年纪大的人更有可能使用手机。女性比男性更有可能使用手机。在温暖的天气里,手机的使用率比寒冷的天气要高。总的来说,这项研究证明了观察性研究对理解社会背景下的技术使用的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors Predicting Observed Cellphone Use in a Midwestern USA University Campus Area
Cellphones are an integral part of life for many adults in technologically advanced societies. There is extensive research and literature on cellphones and social technology, with most studies conducted through self-report surveys, experience sampling, and system log data. Although selfreport survey methods are useful for examining how individuals perceive and feel about cellphone related issues, self-reported cellphone usage behavior is only moderately correlated with objective system log data. Naturalistic observations complement findings from self-report survey methods and may be the best method of objectively assessing both the patterns of and influences on cellphone use in real-world social contexts. Observers documented cellphone use among individuals (N = 4079) in seven public areas within or immediately surrounding a large public university campus in the Midwestern USA. Observers recorded whether or not individuals were using their cellphones, as well as individual’s sex, approximate age (undergraduate or older), group size, if the individual was engaged in live conversation with companions, and the prevailing weather conditions. Those engaged in live conversation were less likely to be using their cellphones than those who were not conversing with companions. Younger adults (those appearing to be in the typical undergraduate age range) were more likely to be using their cellphones than those who appeared older. Women were more likely to be using their cellphones than men. Phone use was higher in warmer weather than on colder days. Overall, this study demonstrates the value of observational studies for understanding technology use in social contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ISHE Travels to Amazon: A Narrative of a Special Issue Based on the XXII ISHE Conference, 5-9 August 2014 in Belém, Brazil The Ethologist’s Corner The Trouble With Certainty in the Study of Human Evolution Women at the “Sight” of Evolution A Lost Idea in Psychology: Observation as Starting Point for the Scientific Investigation of Human Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1