高等教育中的健康素养:教育方法的系统范围审查

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pedagogy in Health Promotion Pub Date : 2023-08-06 DOI:10.1177/23733799231191107
Yngve Røe, A. Torbjørnsen, B. Stanghelle, S. Helseth, K. Riiser
{"title":"高等教育中的健康素养:教育方法的系统范围审查","authors":"Yngve Røe, A. Torbjørnsen, B. Stanghelle, S. Helseth, K. Riiser","doi":"10.1177/23733799231191107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past decade, health literacy has received increased attention as a tool for promoting health, well-being, and sustainable development. So far, educational approaches to health literacy have mainly been implemented in health sciences education and linked to the needs of health professionals in communication with patients. The main objective of this systematic scoping review was to investigate health literacy educational approaches in higher education study programs, including the covered content and the learning activities employed. Altogether, 26 studies on health literacy training in higher education study programs were included. The most frequent study programs represented were medicine and pharmacy. A wide range of health literacy content was extracted from the studies; by far the most frequently studied skill was patient communication, which was identified in 20 studies, followed by identification of patients with low literacy in 12 studies and conceptual knowledge of health literacy in 11 studies. All studies except one reported the use of student active learning as part of the educational approach, and 17 studies reported the use of educational technology. The scientific literature indicates that current health literacy educational approaches mainly focus on the individual components of health literacy and fail to address environmental components and health literacy in vulnerable population groups. Despite the rather extensive use of active learning in educational approaches, pedagogical foundations were scarcely reported. In addition, the use of educational technology was rarely pedagogically integrated.","PeriodicalId":29769,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy in Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Literacy in Higher Education: A Systematic Scoping Review of Educational Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Yngve Røe, A. Torbjørnsen, B. Stanghelle, S. Helseth, K. Riiser\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23733799231191107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past decade, health literacy has received increased attention as a tool for promoting health, well-being, and sustainable development. So far, educational approaches to health literacy have mainly been implemented in health sciences education and linked to the needs of health professionals in communication with patients. The main objective of this systematic scoping review was to investigate health literacy educational approaches in higher education study programs, including the covered content and the learning activities employed. Altogether, 26 studies on health literacy training in higher education study programs were included. The most frequent study programs represented were medicine and pharmacy. A wide range of health literacy content was extracted from the studies; by far the most frequently studied skill was patient communication, which was identified in 20 studies, followed by identification of patients with low literacy in 12 studies and conceptual knowledge of health literacy in 11 studies. All studies except one reported the use of student active learning as part of the educational approach, and 17 studies reported the use of educational technology. The scientific literature indicates that current health literacy educational approaches mainly focus on the individual components of health literacy and fail to address environmental components and health literacy in vulnerable population groups. Despite the rather extensive use of active learning in educational approaches, pedagogical foundations were scarcely reported. In addition, the use of educational technology was rarely pedagogically integrated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogy in Health Promotion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogy in Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799231191107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy in Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799231191107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去十年中,卫生知识普及作为促进健康、福祉和可持续发展的工具受到越来越多的关注。迄今为止,卫生知识普及的教育方法主要是在卫生科学教育中实施的,并与卫生专业人员与病人交流的需要联系起来。本研究的主要目的是调查高等教育学习计划中的健康素养教育方法,包括涵盖的内容和采用的学习活动。总共纳入了26项关于高等教育研究项目中健康素养培训的研究。最常见的学习项目是医学和药学。从研究中提取了广泛的健康素养内容;到目前为止,最常研究的技能是患者沟通,有20项研究确定了这一点,其次是12项研究确定了识字程度低的患者,11项研究确定了卫生素养的概念知识。除了一项研究外,所有研究都报告了将学生主动学习作为教育方法的一部分,17项研究报告了教育技术的使用。科学文献表明,目前的健康素养教育方法主要侧重于健康素养的个人组成部分,而未能解决弱势群体的环境组成部分和健康素养。尽管在教育方法中相当广泛地使用主动学习,但几乎没有关于教学基础的报道。此外,教育技术的使用很少与教学结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health Literacy in Higher Education: A Systematic Scoping Review of Educational Approaches
Over the past decade, health literacy has received increased attention as a tool for promoting health, well-being, and sustainable development. So far, educational approaches to health literacy have mainly been implemented in health sciences education and linked to the needs of health professionals in communication with patients. The main objective of this systematic scoping review was to investigate health literacy educational approaches in higher education study programs, including the covered content and the learning activities employed. Altogether, 26 studies on health literacy training in higher education study programs were included. The most frequent study programs represented were medicine and pharmacy. A wide range of health literacy content was extracted from the studies; by far the most frequently studied skill was patient communication, which was identified in 20 studies, followed by identification of patients with low literacy in 12 studies and conceptual knowledge of health literacy in 11 studies. All studies except one reported the use of student active learning as part of the educational approach, and 17 studies reported the use of educational technology. The scientific literature indicates that current health literacy educational approaches mainly focus on the individual components of health literacy and fail to address environmental components and health literacy in vulnerable population groups. Despite the rather extensive use of active learning in educational approaches, pedagogical foundations were scarcely reported. In addition, the use of educational technology was rarely pedagogically integrated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strengthening Public Health Preceptorship Through Project ECHO Lowering the Stakes: Quasi-Experimental, Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Restructured Grading Approach in a Graduate Public Health Research Methods Course Design and Implementation of a Course to Meet the Demand for a Skilled Public Health Workforce to Address the Needs of People With Disabilities Recommendations for Integrating Anti-Racist and Inclusive Pedagogy Strategies into Doctoral Teaching Training in Public Health Navigating the Online Classroom: Developing Online Teaching Skills in Graduate Public Health & Health Professions Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1