摩尔多瓦和乌克兰公开政府政策的在线调查投票

IF 3.6 Q1 COMMUNICATION Internet Policy Review Pub Date : 2023-06-21 DOI:10.14763/2023.2.1712
Dmytro Khutkyy, O. Matveieva, Diana Mirza-Grisco
{"title":"摩尔多瓦和乌克兰公开政府政策的在线调查投票","authors":"Dmytro Khutkyy, O. Matveieva, Diana Mirza-Grisco","doi":"10.14763/2023.2.1712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The socio-political impact of voting in online surveys on open government is understudied. This inquiry aims to identify the socio-political impact of voting in online surveys on voters, civil society organisations, government authorities and open government overall in Moldova and Ukraine in 2016 and in 2018. This article applies mixed methods of data collection and analysis: analysis of applied reports, policy analysis of documentation, manual qualitative content analysis of social media posts and of digital voting tools and semi-structured expert interviews of stakeholders. We found that the voting in online surveys for Open Government Partnership commitments influences open government, although more profoundly in Ukraine than in Moldova. Probably, this is due to more intensive and innovative multistakeholder efforts to implement civic education, transparency and accountability in Ukraine. The voting in online surveys occurred at dissimilar stages of policy-making: in Moldova – at the agenda-setting stage, while in Ukraine – at the policy-drafting and decision-making stages. In both countries, the impact of voting in online surveys was more manifest on collaboration between the public and the authorities than on civil society and the least on the authorities. Overall, a formally non-binding voting for policy priorities became an informally binding exercise.","PeriodicalId":45799,"journal":{"name":"Internet Policy Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voting in online surveys on open government policies in Moldova and Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"Dmytro Khutkyy, O. Matveieva, Diana Mirza-Grisco\",\"doi\":\"10.14763/2023.2.1712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The socio-political impact of voting in online surveys on open government is understudied. This inquiry aims to identify the socio-political impact of voting in online surveys on voters, civil society organisations, government authorities and open government overall in Moldova and Ukraine in 2016 and in 2018. This article applies mixed methods of data collection and analysis: analysis of applied reports, policy analysis of documentation, manual qualitative content analysis of social media posts and of digital voting tools and semi-structured expert interviews of stakeholders. We found that the voting in online surveys for Open Government Partnership commitments influences open government, although more profoundly in Ukraine than in Moldova. Probably, this is due to more intensive and innovative multistakeholder efforts to implement civic education, transparency and accountability in Ukraine. The voting in online surveys occurred at dissimilar stages of policy-making: in Moldova – at the agenda-setting stage, while in Ukraine – at the policy-drafting and decision-making stages. In both countries, the impact of voting in online surveys was more manifest on collaboration between the public and the authorities than on civil society and the least on the authorities. Overall, a formally non-binding voting for policy priorities became an informally binding exercise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Policy Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.2.1712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.2.1712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线调查中投票对开放政府的社会政治影响尚未得到充分研究。这项调查旨在确定2016年和2018年摩尔多瓦和乌克兰选民、民间社会组织、政府当局和开放政府在在线调查中投票的社会政治影响。本文采用数据收集和分析的混合方法:应用报告分析、文档政策分析、社交媒体帖子和数字投票工具的手工定性内容分析以及对利益相关者的半结构化专家访谈。我们发现,在线调查中对开放政府伙伴关系承诺的投票影响开放政府,尽管在乌克兰比在摩尔多瓦更深刻。这可能是由于多方利益攸关方在乌克兰实施公民教育、透明度和问责制方面进行了更深入和创新的努力。在线调查中的投票发生在不同的政策制定阶段:在摩尔多瓦,在议程设定阶段,而在乌克兰,在政策起草和决策阶段。在这两个国家,在线调查投票对公众和当局之间合作的影响比对公民社会的影响更明显,对当局的影响最小。总的来说,对政策优先事项的正式不具约束力的投票变成了具有非正式约束力的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Voting in online surveys on open government policies in Moldova and Ukraine
The socio-political impact of voting in online surveys on open government is understudied. This inquiry aims to identify the socio-political impact of voting in online surveys on voters, civil society organisations, government authorities and open government overall in Moldova and Ukraine in 2016 and in 2018. This article applies mixed methods of data collection and analysis: analysis of applied reports, policy analysis of documentation, manual qualitative content analysis of social media posts and of digital voting tools and semi-structured expert interviews of stakeholders. We found that the voting in online surveys for Open Government Partnership commitments influences open government, although more profoundly in Ukraine than in Moldova. Probably, this is due to more intensive and innovative multistakeholder efforts to implement civic education, transparency and accountability in Ukraine. The voting in online surveys occurred at dissimilar stages of policy-making: in Moldova – at the agenda-setting stage, while in Ukraine – at the policy-drafting and decision-making stages. In both countries, the impact of voting in online surveys was more manifest on collaboration between the public and the authorities than on civil society and the least on the authorities. Overall, a formally non-binding voting for policy priorities became an informally binding exercise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
30
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Government responses to online disinformation unpacked Navigating the AI frontier: European parliamentary insights on bias and regulation, preceding the AI Act Regulatory capacity capture: the United Kingdom’s online safety regime A complicated picture: Media diversity in the case of Google’s video search during the pandemic Dis/Trust and data-driven technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1