一种正在恢复的海洋捕食者灰海豹(Halichoerus grypus)饮食的比较方法研究

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 ZOOLOGY Canadian Journal of Zoology Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI:10.1139/cjz-2023-0104
Christina M McCosker, Z. Olson, K. Ono
{"title":"一种正在恢复的海洋捕食者灰海豹(Halichoerus grypus)饮食的比较方法研究","authors":"Christina M McCosker, Z. Olson, K. Ono","doi":"10.1139/cjz-2023-0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anthropogenic influences caused depletion and subsequent recovery of marine predators, but ecological consequences of altered predator abundance are not well-understood. Although many methods are used to study predator diets, methodological biases and logistical challenges preclude robust sampling schemes. We aimed to compare two non-invasive methods: metabarcoding scat-derived DNA and hard parts analysis of scat for the Northwest Atlantic grey seal (Halichoerus grypus (Fabricius, 1791)), a species that rebounded after near extirpation. We hypothesized metabarcoding would detect a greater diversity and frequency of prey, and that notable differences in diet will be detected since prior studies. Grey seal scat samples (N = 247) were collected between 2018¬-2019 from Monomoy Island, Massachusetts, USA. Metabarcoding detected greater prey richness on average, with more frequent detections of clupeids (Clupeidae) and flatfish (Pleuronectiformes) whereas hard parts analysis more frequently detected phycid hakes (Urophycis spp. Gill, 1863). Combining methods increased detections of 13 prey taxa, with 32 prey taxa identified overall. Skates (Rajidae), flatfish, clupeids, and sand lance (Ammodytes spp. Linnaeus, 1758) were top-occurring prey. Our study highlights the importance of using multiple methods to characterize generalist predator diets using non-invasive techniques and suggests grey seal diet has changed since the early 2000s.","PeriodicalId":9484,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative methodological approach to studying the diet of a recovering marine predator, the grey seal (Halichoerus grypus)\",\"authors\":\"Christina M McCosker, Z. Olson, K. Ono\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cjz-2023-0104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anthropogenic influences caused depletion and subsequent recovery of marine predators, but ecological consequences of altered predator abundance are not well-understood. Although many methods are used to study predator diets, methodological biases and logistical challenges preclude robust sampling schemes. We aimed to compare two non-invasive methods: metabarcoding scat-derived DNA and hard parts analysis of scat for the Northwest Atlantic grey seal (Halichoerus grypus (Fabricius, 1791)), a species that rebounded after near extirpation. We hypothesized metabarcoding would detect a greater diversity and frequency of prey, and that notable differences in diet will be detected since prior studies. Grey seal scat samples (N = 247) were collected between 2018¬-2019 from Monomoy Island, Massachusetts, USA. Metabarcoding detected greater prey richness on average, with more frequent detections of clupeids (Clupeidae) and flatfish (Pleuronectiformes) whereas hard parts analysis more frequently detected phycid hakes (Urophycis spp. Gill, 1863). Combining methods increased detections of 13 prey taxa, with 32 prey taxa identified overall. Skates (Rajidae), flatfish, clupeids, and sand lance (Ammodytes spp. Linnaeus, 1758) were top-occurring prey. Our study highlights the importance of using multiple methods to characterize generalist predator diets using non-invasive techniques and suggests grey seal diet has changed since the early 2000s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Zoology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2023-0104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2023-0104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人为影响导致了海洋捕食者的减少和随后的恢复,但捕食者丰度改变的生态后果尚不清楚。虽然有许多方法用于研究捕食者的饮食,但方法上的偏差和后勤方面的挑战妨碍了可靠的抽样方案。本研究旨在比较西北大西洋灰海豹(Halichoerus grypus (Fabricius, 1791))的两种非侵入性方法:粪便来源DNA的元条形码和粪便的硬部分分析。我们假设元条形码可以检测到更大的猎物多样性和频率,并且根据先前的研究,可以检测到饮食上的显着差异。2018 -2019年在美国马萨诸塞州Monomoy岛采集灰海豹粪便样本247只。元条形码平均检测到更大的猎物丰富度,更频繁地检测到棍棒类(棍棒科)和比目鱼(Pleuronectiformes),而硬部分分析更频繁地检测到棘鱼(Urophycis spp. Gill, 1863)。综合以上方法,共鉴定出13个猎物类群,共鉴定出32个猎物类群。冰鱼(鳐科)、比目鱼、棍鱼和沙矛(林奈,1758)是最常见的猎物。我们的研究强调了使用多种方法使用非侵入性技术来表征一般捕食者饮食的重要性,并表明自21世纪初以来灰海豹的饮食已经发生了变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative methodological approach to studying the diet of a recovering marine predator, the grey seal (Halichoerus grypus)
Anthropogenic influences caused depletion and subsequent recovery of marine predators, but ecological consequences of altered predator abundance are not well-understood. Although many methods are used to study predator diets, methodological biases and logistical challenges preclude robust sampling schemes. We aimed to compare two non-invasive methods: metabarcoding scat-derived DNA and hard parts analysis of scat for the Northwest Atlantic grey seal (Halichoerus grypus (Fabricius, 1791)), a species that rebounded after near extirpation. We hypothesized metabarcoding would detect a greater diversity and frequency of prey, and that notable differences in diet will be detected since prior studies. Grey seal scat samples (N = 247) were collected between 2018¬-2019 from Monomoy Island, Massachusetts, USA. Metabarcoding detected greater prey richness on average, with more frequent detections of clupeids (Clupeidae) and flatfish (Pleuronectiformes) whereas hard parts analysis more frequently detected phycid hakes (Urophycis spp. Gill, 1863). Combining methods increased detections of 13 prey taxa, with 32 prey taxa identified overall. Skates (Rajidae), flatfish, clupeids, and sand lance (Ammodytes spp. Linnaeus, 1758) were top-occurring prey. Our study highlights the importance of using multiple methods to characterize generalist predator diets using non-invasive techniques and suggests grey seal diet has changed since the early 2000s.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Canadian Journal of Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1929, the Canadian Journal of Zoology is a monthly journal that reports on primary research contributed by respected international scientists in the broad field of zoology, including behaviour, biochemistry and physiology, developmental biology, ecology, genetics, morphology and ultrastructure, parasitology and pathology, and systematics and evolution. It also invites experts to submit review articles on topics of current interest.
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal distribution of the non-indigenous peach blossom jellyfish Craspedacusta sowerbii in British Columbia, Canada Spatiotemporal distribution of the non-indigenous peach blossom jellyfish Craspedacusta sowerbii in British Columbia, Canada Nursing behavior of wild polar bears in the Canadian High Arctic Seasonal dynamics of small mammal populations: resource availability and cold exposure interact to govern abundance Determinants of Multiple Brooding in Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) in Atlantic Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1