不公平在学校应对COVID-19大流行中的作用

Q2 Social Sciences Peabody Journal of Education Pub Date : 2022-05-27 DOI:10.1080/0161956X.2022.2079882
J. Supovitz, Om Manghani
{"title":"不公平在学校应对COVID-19大流行中的作用","authors":"J. Supovitz, Om Manghani","doi":"10.1080/0161956X.2022.2079882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The onset of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 was an unprecedented crisis for educators across the world. In the United States, on or about March 13 of that year, virtually every school across the nation shuttered its doors in the face of the microbial onslaught. Never before had a singular event caused the entire education system to shift its core methods of functioning. How did schools respond to this extraordinary stress test? How did principals describe the inequities that surfaced? And what was the relationship between social inequity and school responses? To address these questions, we developed a crisis management framework to guide an examination of early school responses to the pandemic and examined the association between indicators of adversity and schools’ return to instruction. The data come from a unique mixed-method dataset featuring principal interviews and publicly available data from 120 public school schools in 69 districts in 19 states collected in the spring of 2020. The findings show how social circumstances factored into the adversity that educators faced and how inequity played a significant role in schools’ return to functioning.","PeriodicalId":39777,"journal":{"name":"Peabody Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Inequity in School Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"J. Supovitz, Om Manghani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0161956X.2022.2079882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The onset of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 was an unprecedented crisis for educators across the world. In the United States, on or about March 13 of that year, virtually every school across the nation shuttered its doors in the face of the microbial onslaught. Never before had a singular event caused the entire education system to shift its core methods of functioning. How did schools respond to this extraordinary stress test? How did principals describe the inequities that surfaced? And what was the relationship between social inequity and school responses? To address these questions, we developed a crisis management framework to guide an examination of early school responses to the pandemic and examined the association between indicators of adversity and schools’ return to instruction. The data come from a unique mixed-method dataset featuring principal interviews and publicly available data from 120 public school schools in 69 districts in 19 states collected in the spring of 2020. The findings show how social circumstances factored into the adversity that educators faced and how inequity played a significant role in schools’ return to functioning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peabody Journal of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peabody Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2022.2079882\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peabody Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2022.2079882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2020年冠状病毒大流行的爆发对全世界的教育工作者来说是一场前所未有的危机。在美国,在那一年的3月13日左右,面对微生物的猛攻,全国几乎所有的学校都关门了。以前从来没有一个单一事件导致整个教育系统改变其核心运作方法。学校对这次非同寻常的压力测试有何反应?校长们是如何描述这些浮出水面的不平等现象的?社会不平等和学校反应之间的关系是什么?为了解决这些问题,我们制定了一个危机管理框架,以指导对学校早期应对大流行的审查,并审查了逆境指标与学校恢复教学之间的关系。这些数据来自一个独特的混合方法数据集,其中包括2020年春季收集的19个州69个地区120所公立学校的校长访谈和公开数据。研究结果表明,社会环境是如何影响教育工作者所面临的逆境的,以及不平等是如何在学校恢复正常运转中发挥重要作用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Role of Inequity in School Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic
ABSTRACT The onset of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 was an unprecedented crisis for educators across the world. In the United States, on or about March 13 of that year, virtually every school across the nation shuttered its doors in the face of the microbial onslaught. Never before had a singular event caused the entire education system to shift its core methods of functioning. How did schools respond to this extraordinary stress test? How did principals describe the inequities that surfaced? And what was the relationship between social inequity and school responses? To address these questions, we developed a crisis management framework to guide an examination of early school responses to the pandemic and examined the association between indicators of adversity and schools’ return to instruction. The data come from a unique mixed-method dataset featuring principal interviews and publicly available data from 120 public school schools in 69 districts in 19 states collected in the spring of 2020. The findings show how social circumstances factored into the adversity that educators faced and how inequity played a significant role in schools’ return to functioning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peabody Journal of Education
Peabody Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Peabody Journal of Education (PJE) publishes quarterly symposia in the broad area of education, including but not limited to topics related to formal institutions serving students in early childhood, pre-school, primary, elementary, intermediate, secondary, post-secondary, and tertiary education. The scope of the journal includes special kinds of educational institutions, such as those providing vocational training or the schooling for students with disabilities. PJE also welcomes manuscript submissions that concentrate on informal education dynamics, those outside the immediate framework of institutions, and education matters that are important to nations outside the United States.
期刊最新文献
Should Religious Schools Be Publicly Funded? Issues of Religion, Discrimination, and Equity New York City Catholic Schools Operating in the Public Space in a Post- Makin World Education Research-Practice Partnerships: Impacts and Dynamics Broadening our Understanding of how Research-Practice Partnerships Support Educational Improvement and Equitable Transformation Embedding Racialized Selves into the Creation of Research-Practice Partnerships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1