协调分散的授权、次要目标和可持续性的重要性:欧洲央行在单一监管机制中的作用

Q2 Social Sciences European Business Law Review Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.54648/eulr2022015
Kern Alexander
{"title":"协调分散的授权、次要目标和可持续性的重要性:欧洲央行在单一监管机制中的作用","authors":"Kern Alexander","doi":"10.54648/eulr2022015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses the institutional and legal framework governing the ECB’s monetary policy competence to promote price stability alongside its banking supervisory objectives as set forth under the Single Supervisory Mechanism Regulation. The article argues that the ECB’s primary mandate to promote price stability in the EU Treaty creates an imbalance in its institutional competence to pursue other secondary objectives referred to in the Treaty and in EU legislation. It is further argued that this so-called lop-sided mandate in favour of the price stability objective may undermine its effectiveness in pursuing other objectives, such as banking sector stability, climate change mitigation and in addressing other emerging financial risks. The article proposes some modifications to the current separation of competences within the ECB in order to achieve more institutional balance so that its objectives can be more effectively carried out.\nBanking Union, Single Supervisory Mechanism, European Central Bank, banking supervision, price stability, secondary objectives, monetary policy, economic policy, sustainability, regulation","PeriodicalId":53431,"journal":{"name":"European Business Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconciling Lopsided Mandates, Secondary Objectives and the Importance of Sustainability: The Role of the European Central Bank in the Single Supervisory Mechanism\",\"authors\":\"Kern Alexander\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/eulr2022015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyses the institutional and legal framework governing the ECB’s monetary policy competence to promote price stability alongside its banking supervisory objectives as set forth under the Single Supervisory Mechanism Regulation. The article argues that the ECB’s primary mandate to promote price stability in the EU Treaty creates an imbalance in its institutional competence to pursue other secondary objectives referred to in the Treaty and in EU legislation. It is further argued that this so-called lop-sided mandate in favour of the price stability objective may undermine its effectiveness in pursuing other objectives, such as banking sector stability, climate change mitigation and in addressing other emerging financial risks. The article proposes some modifications to the current separation of competences within the ECB in order to achieve more institutional balance so that its objectives can be more effectively carried out.\\nBanking Union, Single Supervisory Mechanism, European Central Bank, banking supervision, price stability, secondary objectives, monetary policy, economic policy, sustainability, regulation\",\"PeriodicalId\":53431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2022015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Business Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2022015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文分析了管理欧洲央行货币政策能力的制度和法律框架,以促进价格稳定,以及《单一监管机制条例》规定的银行监管目标。文章认为,欧洲央行在《欧盟条约》中促进价格稳定的主要任务,导致其追求《条约》和欧盟立法中提及的其他次要目标的机构能力失衡。有人进一步认为,这种支持价格稳定目标的所谓片面授权可能会削弱其追求其他目标的有效性,如银行业稳定、缓解气候变化和应对其他新出现的金融风险。文章对欧洲央行目前的职权分离提出了一些修改,以实现更多的制度平衡,从而使其目标能够更有效地实现。银行联盟、单一监管机制、欧洲央行、银行监管、价格稳定、次要目标、货币政策、经济政策、可持续性、监管
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reconciling Lopsided Mandates, Secondary Objectives and the Importance of Sustainability: The Role of the European Central Bank in the Single Supervisory Mechanism
The article analyses the institutional and legal framework governing the ECB’s monetary policy competence to promote price stability alongside its banking supervisory objectives as set forth under the Single Supervisory Mechanism Regulation. The article argues that the ECB’s primary mandate to promote price stability in the EU Treaty creates an imbalance in its institutional competence to pursue other secondary objectives referred to in the Treaty and in EU legislation. It is further argued that this so-called lop-sided mandate in favour of the price stability objective may undermine its effectiveness in pursuing other objectives, such as banking sector stability, climate change mitigation and in addressing other emerging financial risks. The article proposes some modifications to the current separation of competences within the ECB in order to achieve more institutional balance so that its objectives can be more effectively carried out. Banking Union, Single Supervisory Mechanism, European Central Bank, banking supervision, price stability, secondary objectives, monetary policy, economic policy, sustainability, regulation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Business Law Review
European Business Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The mission of the European Business Law Review is to provide a forum for analysis and discussion of business law, including European Union law and the laws of the Member States and other European countries, as well as legal frameworks and issues in international and comparative contexts. The Review moves freely over the boundaries that divide the law, and covers business law, broadly defined, in public or private law, domestic, European or international law. Our topics of interest include commercial, financial, corporate, private and regulatory laws with a broadly business dimension. The Review offers current, authoritative scholarship on a wide range of issues and developments, featuring contributors providing an international as well as a European perspective. The Review is an invaluable source of current scholarship, information, practical analysis, and expert guidance for all practising lawyers, advisers, and scholars dealing with European business law on a regular basis. The Review has over 25 years established the highest scholarly standards. It distinguishes itself as open-minded, embracing interests that appeal to the scholarly, practitioner and policy-making spheres. It practices strict routines of peer review. The Review imposes no word limit on submissions, subject to the appropriateness of the word length to the subject under discussion.
期刊最新文献
Article: Legislation Comment: Considerations on the Digital Markets Act, the Way to a Fair and Open Digital Environment Article: Open-Price Contracts Under the CISG: The Law in Action Article: EU Law and the Member States’ Competence to Regulate the Operation of Collaborative Economy Platforms – Where Do We Stand after the Digital Services Act Article: The Systemic Importance of Asset Managers: A Case Study for the Future of SIFI Regulation Article: Codes of Conduct in German Employment Relationships – A Measure to Adequately Implementing Compliance and Data Protection?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1