在被迫流离失所的情况下,谁的需求最重要?重新重视老年人并解决他们被排除在研究和人道主义方案之外的问题

Midori T. Kaga, Delphine Nakache
{"title":"在被迫流离失所的情况下,谁的需求最重要?重新重视老年人并解决他们被排除在研究和人道主义方案之外的问题","authors":"Midori T. Kaga, Delphine Nakache","doi":"10.1504/IJMBS.2019.10021306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Older people remain one of the most neglected, invisible, and marginalised groups among displaced persons, which is in part due to ageist stereotypes that persist and permeate the humanitarian system. Using a theoretical framework grounded in the capabilities approach, this article examines urban/protracted situations of displacement in developing countries and highlights gaps in the limited knowledge and assistance to older displaced persons that must be bridged in order to break the vicious cycle between research and policy that continue to marginalise older persons from humanitarian responses. At the heart of the issue around older peoples' exclusion and invisibility is their lack of voice in decision-making processes and their capacity to contribute to improving the programmes and policies that directly impact them. The paper thus also argues for the meaningful inclusion of older displaced persons in decision-making processes around programmes that concern them.","PeriodicalId":90549,"journal":{"name":"International journal of migration and border studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whose needs count in situations of forced displacement Revaluing older people and addressing their exclusion from research and humanitarian programmes\",\"authors\":\"Midori T. Kaga, Delphine Nakache\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJMBS.2019.10021306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Older people remain one of the most neglected, invisible, and marginalised groups among displaced persons, which is in part due to ageist stereotypes that persist and permeate the humanitarian system. Using a theoretical framework grounded in the capabilities approach, this article examines urban/protracted situations of displacement in developing countries and highlights gaps in the limited knowledge and assistance to older displaced persons that must be bridged in order to break the vicious cycle between research and policy that continue to marginalise older persons from humanitarian responses. At the heart of the issue around older peoples' exclusion and invisibility is their lack of voice in decision-making processes and their capacity to contribute to improving the programmes and policies that directly impact them. The paper thus also argues for the meaningful inclusion of older displaced persons in decision-making processes around programmes that concern them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of migration and border studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of migration and border studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMBS.2019.10021306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of migration and border studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMBS.2019.10021306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

老年人仍然是流离失所者中最被忽视、最被忽视和最被边缘化的群体之一,这在一定程度上是由于人道主义系统中持续存在并弥漫着对老年人的刻板印象。本文使用基于能力方法的理论框架,研究了发展中国家的城市/长期流离失所情况,并强调了对老年流离失所者的有限知识和援助方面的差距,为了打破研究和政策之间的恶性循环,这种恶性循环继续将老年人排斥在人道主义反应之外,必须弥合这些差距。老年人被排斥和被忽视的核心问题是,他们在决策过程中缺乏发言权,也没有能力为改进直接影响他们的规划和政策做出贡献。因此,该文件还主张将老年流离失所者有意义地纳入与他们有关的方案的决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Whose needs count in situations of forced displacement Revaluing older people and addressing their exclusion from research and humanitarian programmes
Older people remain one of the most neglected, invisible, and marginalised groups among displaced persons, which is in part due to ageist stereotypes that persist and permeate the humanitarian system. Using a theoretical framework grounded in the capabilities approach, this article examines urban/protracted situations of displacement in developing countries and highlights gaps in the limited knowledge and assistance to older displaced persons that must be bridged in order to break the vicious cycle between research and policy that continue to marginalise older persons from humanitarian responses. At the heart of the issue around older peoples' exclusion and invisibility is their lack of voice in decision-making processes and their capacity to contribute to improving the programmes and policies that directly impact them. The paper thus also argues for the meaningful inclusion of older displaced persons in decision-making processes around programmes that concern them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Positioning processes and dissent among Colombian migrants in Australia Imposed dehumanised realities: crisis biopolitics at Lesvos border camps in the pandemic era of COVID-19 Bordering through legal non-existence: the production of de facto statelessness among women and children through the National Registry of Citizens in Assam, India Narratives from non-citizen former youth in child welfare care fighting crimmigration and deportation Local variations in integration policies: experiences from the perspectives of immigrants in Sweden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1