不是为了意识形态而是为了机会?疑欧派意大利欧盟问题投票的基础

IF 2.2 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Contemporary Italian Politics Pub Date : 2022-03-17 DOI:10.1080/23248823.2022.2052485
Davide Angelucci, Luca Carrieri
{"title":"不是为了意识形态而是为了机会?疑欧派意大利欧盟问题投票的基础","authors":"Davide Angelucci, Luca Carrieri","doi":"10.1080/23248823.2022.2052485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Party-system dynamics and party EU ideology have traditionally influenced trends in EU issue-voting, with opposition and Eurosceptic parties being more likely to benefit electorally from EU issues. While the electoral benefits of Eurosceptic and opposition parties on the EU have been separately analysed, less is known about the persistence of these preference configurations when Eurosceptic parties move into government. This raises a key question: Does the electoral potential of Eurosceptic parties change once they take over government? We address this question focusing on the Italian case, which, due to the experience of having had a fully-fledged Eurosceptic cabinet in the 2018–2019 period, allows us to test whether changes in governing/opposition status affect the electoral performance of Eurosceptic/Europhile parties on EU issues. While confirming that Italian voters are likely, electorally, to reward opposition and Eurosceptic parties on Europe more than governing and Europhile parties, the article shows that Eurosceptic parties, by assuming government office, tend to lose their electoral advantage on EU issues, not only as compared to Europhile parties, but also to Eurosceptic parties remaining in opposition. In contrast, governing/opposition status does not condition the electoral potential of Europhile parties on the EU dimension.","PeriodicalId":37572,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Italian Politics","volume":"15 1","pages":"5 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not for ideology but opportunity? The foundations of EU issue-voting in Eurosceptic Italy\",\"authors\":\"Davide Angelucci, Luca Carrieri\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23248823.2022.2052485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Party-system dynamics and party EU ideology have traditionally influenced trends in EU issue-voting, with opposition and Eurosceptic parties being more likely to benefit electorally from EU issues. While the electoral benefits of Eurosceptic and opposition parties on the EU have been separately analysed, less is known about the persistence of these preference configurations when Eurosceptic parties move into government. This raises a key question: Does the electoral potential of Eurosceptic parties change once they take over government? We address this question focusing on the Italian case, which, due to the experience of having had a fully-fledged Eurosceptic cabinet in the 2018–2019 period, allows us to test whether changes in governing/opposition status affect the electoral performance of Eurosceptic/Europhile parties on EU issues. While confirming that Italian voters are likely, electorally, to reward opposition and Eurosceptic parties on Europe more than governing and Europhile parties, the article shows that Eurosceptic parties, by assuming government office, tend to lose their electoral advantage on EU issues, not only as compared to Europhile parties, but also to Eurosceptic parties remaining in opposition. In contrast, governing/opposition status does not condition the electoral potential of Europhile parties on the EU dimension.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Italian Politics\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"5 - 23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Italian Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2022.2052485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Italian Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2022.2052485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

政党制度动态和政党的欧盟意识形态传统上影响着欧盟问题投票的趋势,反对党和欧洲怀疑主义政党更有可能从欧盟问题中获益。虽然欧洲怀疑论者和反对党对欧盟的选举利益已经分别进行了分析,但当欧洲怀疑论者进入政府时,这些偏好配置的持久性却鲜为人知。这就提出了一个关键问题:一旦疑欧派政党接管政府,他们的选举潜力会发生变化吗?我们以意大利为例来解决这个问题,由于意大利在2018-2019年期间拥有一个成熟的疑欧派内阁,因此我们可以测试执政/反对派地位的变化是否会影响疑欧派/亲欧派政党在欧盟问题上的选举表现。虽然这篇文章证实了意大利选民在选举中更有可能在欧洲问题上奖励反对党和疑欧派,而不是执政党和亲欧派,但这篇文章表明,与亲欧派政党相比,疑欧派政党往往会在欧盟问题上失去选举优势,这不仅是与亲欧派政党相比,也是与仍在野的疑欧派政党相比。相比之下,执政/反对派地位并不影响亲欧政党在欧盟层面的选举潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Not for ideology but opportunity? The foundations of EU issue-voting in Eurosceptic Italy
ABSTRACT Party-system dynamics and party EU ideology have traditionally influenced trends in EU issue-voting, with opposition and Eurosceptic parties being more likely to benefit electorally from EU issues. While the electoral benefits of Eurosceptic and opposition parties on the EU have been separately analysed, less is known about the persistence of these preference configurations when Eurosceptic parties move into government. This raises a key question: Does the electoral potential of Eurosceptic parties change once they take over government? We address this question focusing on the Italian case, which, due to the experience of having had a fully-fledged Eurosceptic cabinet in the 2018–2019 period, allows us to test whether changes in governing/opposition status affect the electoral performance of Eurosceptic/Europhile parties on EU issues. While confirming that Italian voters are likely, electorally, to reward opposition and Eurosceptic parties on Europe more than governing and Europhile parties, the article shows that Eurosceptic parties, by assuming government office, tend to lose their electoral advantage on EU issues, not only as compared to Europhile parties, but also to Eurosceptic parties remaining in opposition. In contrast, governing/opposition status does not condition the electoral potential of Europhile parties on the EU dimension.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Italian Politics
Contemporary Italian Politics Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Contemporary Italian Politics, formerly Bulletin of Italian Politics, is a political science journal aimed at academics and policy makers as well as others with a professional or intellectual interest in the politics of Italy. The journal has two main aims: Firstly, to provide rigorous analysis, in the English language, about the politics of what is one of the European Union’s four largest states in terms of population and Gross Domestic Product. We seek to do this aware that too often those in the English-speaking world looking for incisive analysis and insight into the latest trends and developments in Italian politics are likely to be stymied by two contrasting difficulties. On the one hand, they can turn to the daily and weekly print media. Here they will find information on the latest developments, sure enough; but much of it is likely to lack the incisiveness of academic writing and may even be straightforwardly inaccurate. On the other hand, readers can turn either to general political science journals – but here they will have to face the issue of fragmented information – or to specific journals on Italy – in which case they will find that politics is considered only insofar as it is part of the broader field of modern Italian studies[...] The second aim follows from the first insofar as, in seeking to achieve it, we hope thereby to provide analysis that readers will find genuinely useful. With research funding bodies of all kinds giving increasing emphasis to knowledge transfer and increasingly demanding of applicants that they demonstrate the relevance of what they are doing to non-academic ‘end users’, political scientists have a self-interested motive for attempting a closer engagement with outside practitioners.
期刊最新文献
La justice en examen La justice en examen , by Cécile Vigour, Bartolomeo Cappellina, Laurence Dumoulin and Virginie Gautron, Presses Universitaires de France - P.U.F., Paris, 2022, 436 pp., €28.00 (Hardback), EAN 9782130836056 Neoliberal transformations of the Italian State: understanding the roots of the crises Neoliberal transformations of the Italian State: understanding the roots of the crises , by Adriano Cozzolino, Lanham, MD/London, Rowman & Littlefield, 2021, 216 pp., $110.00 (hardback), ISBN: 9781786614735. Come votano le periferie. Comportamento elettorale e disagio sociale nelle città Italiane Come votano le periferie. Comportamento elettorale e disagio sociale nelle città Italiane , by Marco Valbruzzi (ed.), Bologna, Il Mulino, 2021, 344 pp., €28 (paperback), ISBN: 978-88-15-29435-7 Il presidente del consiglio dei ministri. mediatore o decisore? Il presidente del consiglio dei ministri. mediatore o decisore? by Francesco Clementi, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2023, 240 pp., €16,00 (paperback), ISNB: 9788815386359 Mussolini’s grandchildren: fascism in contemporary Italy Mussolini’s grandchildren: fascism in contemporary Italy , edited by David Broder, London, Pluto Press, 2023, 240 pp., £17.99 (paperback), ISBN: 9780745348025
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1