{"title":"供应链弹性及其与数字技术的相互作用:使创新在紧急情况下发挥作用","authors":"D. Ivanov, J. Blackhurst, Ajay Das","doi":"10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2021-409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supply chain resilience and its interplay with digital technologies: making innovations work in emergency situations Resilience in supply chains is as vital for firms as immune systems are for human beings. Immune systems continuously monitor, anticipate and adapt to dynamic environments. Similarly, resilience capabilities in supply chains (SC) enable recovery and adaptation when the SC are exposed to and affected by changes in environmental and operational factors (MacCarthy et al., 2016). One such significant and rapidly emerging change is digitalization in firms and in society (Richey et al., 2016, Ivanov et al., 2019c; Panetto et al., 2019). Supply chain resilience (SCR), as a capability, is both challenged and enhanced by digitalization. Although the concept of resilience in supply chain management (SCM) is not new (Pettit et al., 2010; Blackhurst et al., 2011; Brandon-Jones et al., 2014; Hohenstein et al., 2015; Chowdhury and Quaddus, 2017; Hosseini et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2020), ongoing developments in digital technologies have been introduced fairly recently in the field of SCR and have not yet been well explored (Papadopoulos et al., 2017; Dubey et al., 2021; Ivanov et al., 2019a, b; Queiroz et al., 2019; Brintrup et al., 2020; Lohmer et al., 2020; Ralston and Blackhurst, 2020). Innovations in digital technologies influence the development of new paradigms, principles and models in SCM in general, and SCR in particular. We consider digital technology as a combination of Industry 4.0, the Internet of Things (IoT), Big Data analytics, artificial intelligence, advanced tracking and tracing technologies, wearables and additive manufacturing (Baryannis et al., 2019; B€ uy€ uk€ozkan and G€oçer, 2018; Ben-Daya et al., 2019; Ivanov et al., 2020; Frazzon et al., 2021). Accompanying such technological advances in managing SCR are similar advances in organizational practice and culture, involving the socio-technical aspects of new technology use. Moreover, the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus and the associated global pandemic showed that firms with an extensive utilization of digital technologies could operate with more resilience due to enhanced visibility and co-ordination (Ivanov, 2020a; Ivanov and Das, 2020; Queiroz et al., 2020). The interplay of SCR and digital technologies can be considered in light of three dimensions.","PeriodicalId":14251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management","volume":"51 1","pages":"97-103"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supply chain resilience and its interplay with digital technologies: making innovations work in emergency situations\",\"authors\":\"D. Ivanov, J. Blackhurst, Ajay Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2021-409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supply chain resilience and its interplay with digital technologies: making innovations work in emergency situations Resilience in supply chains is as vital for firms as immune systems are for human beings. Immune systems continuously monitor, anticipate and adapt to dynamic environments. Similarly, resilience capabilities in supply chains (SC) enable recovery and adaptation when the SC are exposed to and affected by changes in environmental and operational factors (MacCarthy et al., 2016). One such significant and rapidly emerging change is digitalization in firms and in society (Richey et al., 2016, Ivanov et al., 2019c; Panetto et al., 2019). Supply chain resilience (SCR), as a capability, is both challenged and enhanced by digitalization. Although the concept of resilience in supply chain management (SCM) is not new (Pettit et al., 2010; Blackhurst et al., 2011; Brandon-Jones et al., 2014; Hohenstein et al., 2015; Chowdhury and Quaddus, 2017; Hosseini et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2020), ongoing developments in digital technologies have been introduced fairly recently in the field of SCR and have not yet been well explored (Papadopoulos et al., 2017; Dubey et al., 2021; Ivanov et al., 2019a, b; Queiroz et al., 2019; Brintrup et al., 2020; Lohmer et al., 2020; Ralston and Blackhurst, 2020). Innovations in digital technologies influence the development of new paradigms, principles and models in SCM in general, and SCR in particular. We consider digital technology as a combination of Industry 4.0, the Internet of Things (IoT), Big Data analytics, artificial intelligence, advanced tracking and tracing technologies, wearables and additive manufacturing (Baryannis et al., 2019; B€ uy€ uk€ozkan and G€oçer, 2018; Ben-Daya et al., 2019; Ivanov et al., 2020; Frazzon et al., 2021). Accompanying such technological advances in managing SCR are similar advances in organizational practice and culture, involving the socio-technical aspects of new technology use. Moreover, the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus and the associated global pandemic showed that firms with an extensive utilization of digital technologies could operate with more resilience due to enhanced visibility and co-ordination (Ivanov, 2020a; Ivanov and Das, 2020; Queiroz et al., 2020). The interplay of SCR and digital technologies can be considered in light of three dimensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"97-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2021-409\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2021-409","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32
摘要
供应链弹性及其与数字技术的相互作用:使创新在紧急情况下发挥作用供应链弹性对企业的重要性与免疫系统对人类的重要性一样。免疫系统持续监测、预测和适应动态环境。同样,当供应链暴露于环境和运营因素的变化并受到其影响时,供应链的恢复能力能够实现恢复和适应(MacCarthy等人,2016)。其中一个重大且迅速出现的变化是企业和社会的数字化(Richey等人,2016,Ivanov等人,2019c;Panetto等人,2019)。供应链弹性(SCR)作为一种能力,受到数字化的挑战和增强。尽管供应链管理中的弹性概念并不新鲜(Pettit et al.,2010;Blackhurst et al.,2011;Brandon Jones et al.,2014;Hohenstein et al.,2015;Chowdhury和Quaddus,2017;Hosseini et al.,2019;Xu et al.,2020),数字技术的持续发展最近才被引入SCR领域,尚未得到很好的探索(Papadopoulos等人,2017;Dubey等人,2021;Ivanov等人,2019a,b;Queiroz等人,2019;Brintrup等人,2020;Lohmer等人,2020年;Ralston和Blackhurst,2020)。数字技术的创新影响着供应链管理,特别是SCR的新范式、原则和模型的发展。我们认为数字技术是工业4.0、物联网、大数据分析、人工智能、先进的跟踪和追踪技术、可穿戴设备和增材制造的结合(Baryannis等人,2019;B€uy€uk€ozkan和G€oçer,2018;Ben Daya等人,2019年;Ivanov等人,2020;Frazzon等人,2021)。伴随着SCR管理方面的技术进步,还有组织实践和文化方面的类似进步,涉及新技术使用的社会技术方面。此外,2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)病毒的爆发和相关的全球大流行表明,由于可见性和协调性的增强,广泛利用数字技术的公司可以以更大的弹性运营(Ivanov,2020a;Ivanov和Das,2020;Queiroz等人,2020)。可控硅和数字技术的相互作用可以从三个维度来考虑。
Supply chain resilience and its interplay with digital technologies: making innovations work in emergency situations
Supply chain resilience and its interplay with digital technologies: making innovations work in emergency situations Resilience in supply chains is as vital for firms as immune systems are for human beings. Immune systems continuously monitor, anticipate and adapt to dynamic environments. Similarly, resilience capabilities in supply chains (SC) enable recovery and adaptation when the SC are exposed to and affected by changes in environmental and operational factors (MacCarthy et al., 2016). One such significant and rapidly emerging change is digitalization in firms and in society (Richey et al., 2016, Ivanov et al., 2019c; Panetto et al., 2019). Supply chain resilience (SCR), as a capability, is both challenged and enhanced by digitalization. Although the concept of resilience in supply chain management (SCM) is not new (Pettit et al., 2010; Blackhurst et al., 2011; Brandon-Jones et al., 2014; Hohenstein et al., 2015; Chowdhury and Quaddus, 2017; Hosseini et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2020), ongoing developments in digital technologies have been introduced fairly recently in the field of SCR and have not yet been well explored (Papadopoulos et al., 2017; Dubey et al., 2021; Ivanov et al., 2019a, b; Queiroz et al., 2019; Brintrup et al., 2020; Lohmer et al., 2020; Ralston and Blackhurst, 2020). Innovations in digital technologies influence the development of new paradigms, principles and models in SCM in general, and SCR in particular. We consider digital technology as a combination of Industry 4.0, the Internet of Things (IoT), Big Data analytics, artificial intelligence, advanced tracking and tracing technologies, wearables and additive manufacturing (Baryannis et al., 2019; B€ uy€ uk€ozkan and G€oçer, 2018; Ben-Daya et al., 2019; Ivanov et al., 2020; Frazzon et al., 2021). Accompanying such technological advances in managing SCR are similar advances in organizational practice and culture, involving the socio-technical aspects of new technology use. Moreover, the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus and the associated global pandemic showed that firms with an extensive utilization of digital technologies could operate with more resilience due to enhanced visibility and co-ordination (Ivanov, 2020a; Ivanov and Das, 2020; Queiroz et al., 2020). The interplay of SCR and digital technologies can be considered in light of three dimensions.
期刊介绍:
IJPDLM seeks strategically focused, theoretically grounded, empirical and conceptual, quantitative and qualitative, rigorous and relevant, original research studies in logistics, physical distribution and supply chain management operations and associated strategic issues. Quantitatively oriented mathematical and modelling research papers are not suitable for IJPDLM. Desired topics include, but are not limited to: Customer service strategy Omni-channel and multi-channel distribution innovations Order processing and inventory management Implementation of supply chain processes Information and communication technology Sourcing and procurement Risk management and security Personnel recruitment and training Sustainability and environmental Collaboration and integration Global supply chain management and network complexity Information and knowledge management Legal, financial and public policy Retailing, channels and business-to-business management Organizational and human resource development Logistics and SCM education.