南方国家边境管制的外部化:以马来西亚和印度尼西亚为例

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Theoretical Criminology Pub Date : 2022-07-12 DOI:10.1177/13624806221104867
Maggy Lee
{"title":"南方国家边境管制的外部化:以马来西亚和印度尼西亚为例","authors":"Maggy Lee","doi":"10.1177/13624806221104867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing scholarship highlights the novel approaches and the capacity of northern states to control mass mobility by externalizing the border; outsource their control apparatus to migrant sending and transit countries; process and detain irregular arrivals in offshore locations; and expand the reach of sovereign powers extraterritorially. Significantly, the processes and outcomes of externalization are neither homogeneous nor uncontested. This article seeks to provide critical insights into the divergent nature of border externalization and contributes to a de-centring of northern-centric notions of the state’s role in border control by comparing how border control plays out in Malaysia and Indonesia under Australia’s externalization policy agenda. Their different border control outcomes reflect important intervening factors in the two countries’ internal (domestic political and economic realities; attitudes towards migrants and their control) and external (interstate geo-political relations) environment in shaping the situated meanings and the realities of border security building.","PeriodicalId":47813,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Criminology","volume":"26 1","pages":"537 - 556"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The externalization of border control in the global South: The cases of Malaysia and Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Maggy Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13624806221104867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Existing scholarship highlights the novel approaches and the capacity of northern states to control mass mobility by externalizing the border; outsource their control apparatus to migrant sending and transit countries; process and detain irregular arrivals in offshore locations; and expand the reach of sovereign powers extraterritorially. Significantly, the processes and outcomes of externalization are neither homogeneous nor uncontested. This article seeks to provide critical insights into the divergent nature of border externalization and contributes to a de-centring of northern-centric notions of the state’s role in border control by comparing how border control plays out in Malaysia and Indonesia under Australia’s externalization policy agenda. Their different border control outcomes reflect important intervening factors in the two countries’ internal (domestic political and economic realities; attitudes towards migrants and their control) and external (interstate geo-political relations) environment in shaping the situated meanings and the realities of border security building.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Criminology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"537 - 556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806221104867\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806221104867","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有的学术研究强调了北方各州通过边界外部化来控制大规模流动的新方法和能力;将其管制机构外包给移民派遣国和过境国;处理和拘留在离岸地点的非法入境者;并扩大主权国家的治外法权。值得注意的是,外部化的过程和结果既不是同质的,也不是没有争议的。本文试图对边界外部化的不同性质提供重要见解,并通过比较马来西亚和印度尼西亚在澳大利亚外部化政策议程下的边境控制如何发挥作用,为北方中心的国家在边境控制中的作用概念的分散化做出贡献。两国不同的边境管制结果反映了两国内部(国内)政治和经济现实中的重要干预因素;对移民及其控制的态度)和外部(州际地缘政治关系)环境在塑造边境安全建设的定位意义和现实方面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The externalization of border control in the global South: The cases of Malaysia and Indonesia
Existing scholarship highlights the novel approaches and the capacity of northern states to control mass mobility by externalizing the border; outsource their control apparatus to migrant sending and transit countries; process and detain irregular arrivals in offshore locations; and expand the reach of sovereign powers extraterritorially. Significantly, the processes and outcomes of externalization are neither homogeneous nor uncontested. This article seeks to provide critical insights into the divergent nature of border externalization and contributes to a de-centring of northern-centric notions of the state’s role in border control by comparing how border control plays out in Malaysia and Indonesia under Australia’s externalization policy agenda. Their different border control outcomes reflect important intervening factors in the two countries’ internal (domestic political and economic realities; attitudes towards migrants and their control) and external (interstate geo-political relations) environment in shaping the situated meanings and the realities of border security building.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theoretical Criminology
Theoretical Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Consistently ranked in the top 12 of its category in the Thomson Scientific Journal Citation Reports, Theoretical Criminology is a major interdisciplinary, international, peer reviewed journal for the advancement of the theoretical aspects of criminological knowledge. Theoretical Criminology is concerned with theories, concepts, narratives and myths of crime, criminal behaviour, social deviance, criminal law, morality, justice, social regulation and governance. The journal is committed to renewing general theoretical debate, exploring the interrelation of theory and data in empirical research and advancing the links between criminological analysis and general social, political and cultural theory.
期刊最新文献
The conceptual limits of risk governance in terrorism prevention: Towards a theory of threat thinking Book Review: Negotiating Class in Youth Justice: Professional Practice and Interactions by Jasmina Arnež Book Review: The Horror of Police by Travis Linnemann Colourblindness across borders: The de-racialized logics of Dutch and American border agents How southern is Southern criminology in Latin America?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1