社论:货币政策的分配效应

IF 3.3 3区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Economic Policy Reform Pub Date : 2022-01-09 DOI:10.1080/17487870.2021.1997748
P. Arestis, S. Pérez-Moreno
{"title":"社论:货币政策的分配效应","authors":"P. Arestis, S. Pérez-Moreno","doi":"10.1080/17487870.2021.1997748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"policy” analyses the income distributional effect of monetary policy in the UK during the period 1993–2019, comparing the distributional impact of the conventional and unconventional monetary policy applied during the 1993–2008 and 2009–2019 periods, respectively. They explore the role of income composition and earnings heterogeneity as empirically relevant transmission channels of the distributional impact of monetary policy. While during the conventional monetary policy period (1993–2008) the effect of expansionary monetary policy on income inequality is non-conclusive, they conclude that the unconventional monetary policy shocks increased income inequality during the 2009–2019 period. This is primarily related to stock market gains of the upper part of income distribution because of the Quantitative Easing programs implemented during the decade of 2010s. These implications on income inequality, which differ from the results obtained in some other previous studies, lead the authors to warn of similar results expected as a consequence of the Bank of England’s measures in response to the Covid-19 disruption.","PeriodicalId":51737,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Policy Reform","volume":"25 1","pages":"415 - 419"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: Distributional Effects of Monetary Policy\",\"authors\":\"P. Arestis, S. Pérez-Moreno\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17487870.2021.1997748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"policy” analyses the income distributional effect of monetary policy in the UK during the period 1993–2019, comparing the distributional impact of the conventional and unconventional monetary policy applied during the 1993–2008 and 2009–2019 periods, respectively. They explore the role of income composition and earnings heterogeneity as empirically relevant transmission channels of the distributional impact of monetary policy. While during the conventional monetary policy period (1993–2008) the effect of expansionary monetary policy on income inequality is non-conclusive, they conclude that the unconventional monetary policy shocks increased income inequality during the 2009–2019 period. This is primarily related to stock market gains of the upper part of income distribution because of the Quantitative Easing programs implemented during the decade of 2010s. These implications on income inequality, which differ from the results obtained in some other previous studies, lead the authors to warn of similar results expected as a consequence of the Bank of England’s measures in response to the Covid-19 disruption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Policy Reform\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"415 - 419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Policy Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2021.1997748\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Policy Reform","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2021.1997748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

政策”分析了1993-2019年期间英国货币政策的收入分配效应,分别比较了1993-2008年和2009-2019年期间实施的传统货币政策和非常规货币政策的分配影响。他们探讨了收入构成和收入异质性作为货币政策分配影响的实证相关传导渠道的作用。虽然在常规货币政策时期(1993-2008),扩张性货币政策对收入不平等的影响是不确定的,但他们得出的结论是,非常规货币政策冲击加剧了2009-2019年期间的收入不平等。这主要与收入分配上部的股市收益有关,因为在2010年代实施了量化宽松计划。这些对收入不平等的影响与之前其他一些研究中获得的结果不同,导致作者警告说,由于英格兰银行应对新冠肺炎疫情的措施,预计会产生类似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial: Distributional Effects of Monetary Policy
policy” analyses the income distributional effect of monetary policy in the UK during the period 1993–2019, comparing the distributional impact of the conventional and unconventional monetary policy applied during the 1993–2008 and 2009–2019 periods, respectively. They explore the role of income composition and earnings heterogeneity as empirically relevant transmission channels of the distributional impact of monetary policy. While during the conventional monetary policy period (1993–2008) the effect of expansionary monetary policy on income inequality is non-conclusive, they conclude that the unconventional monetary policy shocks increased income inequality during the 2009–2019 period. This is primarily related to stock market gains of the upper part of income distribution because of the Quantitative Easing programs implemented during the decade of 2010s. These implications on income inequality, which differ from the results obtained in some other previous studies, lead the authors to warn of similar results expected as a consequence of the Bank of England’s measures in response to the Covid-19 disruption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Policy Reform focuses on the analysis of economic policy reform. The journal draws upon what lessons can be learned from the successes and failures of countries undertaking reforms and how existing theories can be developed to shed light on positive as well as normative aspects of the reform process. The Journal of Economic Policy Reform encourages work from economists and political economy analysts on policies to promote growth and reduce poverty, intellectual property rights, aid versus trade, debt and debt relief, taxation and social security systems, surveys of key reform issues, as well as on corruption, democracy, emerging markets and the role of multilateral institutions.
期刊最新文献
When inclusive growth is not enough: advances and limitations of development policies in Uruguay 2005–2019 Shadow economy-income inequality nexus: a panel analysis of West African countries Green and global? A policy frame analysis of the European Investment Bank’s re-branding from 2018–2023 Symposium: digital finance under global uncertainty EIB policy entrepreneurship and the EU’s regulation of Green Bonds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1