了解我吧,亲爱的:在共同挖掘的书信写作中探索批判性、关系性和种族性的读写能力

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal for Multicultural Education Pub Date : 2022-03-16 DOI:10.1108/jme-07-2021-0114
J. Bell, Karen Zaino
{"title":"了解我吧,亲爱的:在共同挖掘的书信写作中探索批判性、关系性和种族性的读写能力","authors":"J. Bell, Karen Zaino","doi":"10.1108/jme-07-2021-0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThere is currently a dearth of research on the implications of the epistolary as a site for knowledge production. This paper aims to demystify the process of academic theorizing through the co-authors’ co-excavative epistolary method.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThrough co-excavative epistolary practices, the co-authors’ relationship was deepened, the collective sense was made of Covid-19, and racial literacy-centered academic theorizing commenced. In the co-authors making meaning of their letter-writing data, they provide examples of and analyze their co-excavative letter-writing process.\n\n\nFindings\nThe co-excavative epistolary method deepened the co-authors’ relationship to one another and improved their ability to produce useful and complicated knowledge.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe co-excavative epistolary exchanges mark a new site for academic theorizing and incite creative approaches to academic co-writing, as well as more transparency about the academic writing process in general.\n\n\nSocial implications\nCo-excavative methods disrupt traditional academic sites of knowledge production and engender space for relational intimacy.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe work introduces both a new method, co-excavative epistolary writing and a new rational framework, the critical dignity relational framework.\n","PeriodicalId":43323,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Multicultural Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Get to know me, homey: exploring critical, relational and racial literacy possibilities in co-excavative letter writing\",\"authors\":\"J. Bell, Karen Zaino\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jme-07-2021-0114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThere is currently a dearth of research on the implications of the epistolary as a site for knowledge production. This paper aims to demystify the process of academic theorizing through the co-authors’ co-excavative epistolary method.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThrough co-excavative epistolary practices, the co-authors’ relationship was deepened, the collective sense was made of Covid-19, and racial literacy-centered academic theorizing commenced. In the co-authors making meaning of their letter-writing data, they provide examples of and analyze their co-excavative letter-writing process.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe co-excavative epistolary method deepened the co-authors’ relationship to one another and improved their ability to produce useful and complicated knowledge.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe co-excavative epistolary exchanges mark a new site for academic theorizing and incite creative approaches to academic co-writing, as well as more transparency about the academic writing process in general.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nCo-excavative methods disrupt traditional academic sites of knowledge production and engender space for relational intimacy.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe work introduces both a new method, co-excavative epistolary writing and a new rational framework, the critical dignity relational framework.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Multicultural Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Multicultural Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-07-2021-0114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Multicultural Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-07-2021-0114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前缺乏关于书信体作为知识生产场所的影响的研究。本文旨在通过作者共同发掘书信体的方法,揭开学术理论化过程的神秘面纱。设计/方法/途径通过共同挖掘的书信实践,加深了共同作者之间的关系,形成了对Covid-19的集体意识,并开始了以种族扫盲为中心的学术理论。在共同作者对书信资料的解读中,他们举例并分析了共同挖掘书信的过程。共同挖掘书信体方法加深了共同作者之间的关系,提高了他们产生有用和复杂知识的能力。研究局限/启示共同挖掘书信交流标志着学术理论化的新领域,并激发了学术共同写作的创造性方法,以及一般学术写作过程的更多透明度。社会影响:co -挖掘方法破坏了传统的知识生产学术场所,为关系亲密创造了空间。本书引入了一种新的方法——共同挖掘式书信体写作,以及一种新的理性框架——批判性尊严关系框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Get to know me, homey: exploring critical, relational and racial literacy possibilities in co-excavative letter writing
Purpose There is currently a dearth of research on the implications of the epistolary as a site for knowledge production. This paper aims to demystify the process of academic theorizing through the co-authors’ co-excavative epistolary method. Design/methodology/approach Through co-excavative epistolary practices, the co-authors’ relationship was deepened, the collective sense was made of Covid-19, and racial literacy-centered academic theorizing commenced. In the co-authors making meaning of their letter-writing data, they provide examples of and analyze their co-excavative letter-writing process. Findings The co-excavative epistolary method deepened the co-authors’ relationship to one another and improved their ability to produce useful and complicated knowledge. Research limitations/implications The co-excavative epistolary exchanges mark a new site for academic theorizing and incite creative approaches to academic co-writing, as well as more transparency about the academic writing process in general. Social implications Co-excavative methods disrupt traditional academic sites of knowledge production and engender space for relational intimacy. Originality/value The work introduces both a new method, co-excavative epistolary writing and a new rational framework, the critical dignity relational framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Multicultural Education
Journal for Multicultural Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal for Multicultural Education is a double-blind peer reviewed journal. Published quarterly, the editorial objectives and coverage focus on: Fostering research into the management of multicultural education, understanding multicultural education in the context of teacher-learner equity and enabling learners to collaborate more effectively across ethnic, cultural and linguistic lines. Topics covered include: -Intercultural education- Inclusive education- Urban education- Diversity in education- Ethnicity in education- Gender and education- Disability and education- Technology and Multicultural education The journal is international in coverage and publishes original, theoretical and applied articles by leading scholars, expert consultants and respected practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Fostering newly resettled refugee-background adolescents’ self-efficacy and advocacy in a community-based youth program Venezuelan migration to Brazil: teachers and students co-constructing multicultural education inside classrooms The relationship between classroom racial/ethnic composition and teacher perceptions of work conditions “I am afflicted with the evil eye!” How Islamic cultural beliefs influence college students’ perceptions of their academic experience The significance of ethnomathematics learning: a cross-cultural perspectives between Indonesian and Thailand educators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1