护理路径实施对跨专业团队合作的影响:一项国际集群随机对照试验。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Interprofessional Care Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-08-07 DOI:10.1080/13561820.2019.1634016
Deborah Seys, Svin Deneckere, Cathy Lodewijckx, Luk Bruyneel, Walter Sermeus, Paulo Boto, Massimiliano Panella, Kris Vanhaecht
{"title":"护理路径实施对跨专业团队合作的影响:一项国际集群随机对照试验。","authors":"Deborah Seys, Svin Deneckere, Cathy Lodewijckx, Luk Bruyneel, Walter Sermeus, Paulo Boto, Massimiliano Panella, Kris Vanhaecht","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2019.1634016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates whether the implementation of an in-hospital care pathway (CP) improves interprofessional teamwork across countries and tests whether improved communications (\"relational coordination\") is the mechanism of action. A hospital-based cluster randomized controlled trial in Ireland, Belgium, Italy, and Portugal was performed. Fifty-six interprofessional teams caring for patients admitted with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or for patients with a proximal femur fracture were included and randomly assigned to an intervention group (31 teams and 567 team members), where a CP was implemented, and a control group (25 teams and 417 team members) representing usual care. Multilevel regression and mediation analysis were applied. First, although no significant effect was found on our primary outcome relational coordination, our CP significantly improved several team inputs, team processes (team climate for innovation) and team output (the level of organized care, level of competence) indicators. Second, our team process indicator of team climate for innovation partially mediated the association between CP implementation and team output indicator of better level of organized care. In conclusion, a CP sets in motion various mechanisms that improve some but not all aspects of interprofessional teamwork. Relational coordination does not appear to be the mechanism by which team outputs are enhanced.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":"1 1","pages":"48-56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of care pathway implementation on interprofessional teamwork: An international cluster randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Seys, Svin Deneckere, Cathy Lodewijckx, Luk Bruyneel, Walter Sermeus, Paulo Boto, Massimiliano Panella, Kris Vanhaecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13561820.2019.1634016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluates whether the implementation of an in-hospital care pathway (CP) improves interprofessional teamwork across countries and tests whether improved communications (\\\"relational coordination\\\") is the mechanism of action. A hospital-based cluster randomized controlled trial in Ireland, Belgium, Italy, and Portugal was performed. Fifty-six interprofessional teams caring for patients admitted with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or for patients with a proximal femur fracture were included and randomly assigned to an intervention group (31 teams and 567 team members), where a CP was implemented, and a control group (25 teams and 417 team members) representing usual care. Multilevel regression and mediation analysis were applied. First, although no significant effect was found on our primary outcome relational coordination, our CP significantly improved several team inputs, team processes (team climate for innovation) and team output (the level of organized care, level of competence) indicators. Second, our team process indicator of team climate for innovation partially mediated the association between CP implementation and team output indicator of better level of organized care. In conclusion, a CP sets in motion various mechanisms that improve some but not all aspects of interprofessional teamwork. Relational coordination does not appear to be the mechanism by which team outputs are enhanced.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Care\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"48-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1634016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1634016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了院内护理途径(CP)的实施是否改善了各国的跨专业团队合作,并测试了改善沟通(“关系协调”)是否是行动机制。在爱尔兰、比利时、意大利和葡萄牙进行了一项基于医院的集群随机对照试验。56个护理慢性阻塞性肺病恶化患者或股骨近端骨折患者的跨专业团队被纳入,并被随机分配到一个实施CP的干预组(31个团队和567名团队成员)和一个代表常规护理的对照组(25个团队和417名团队员员)。采用多层次回归和中介分析。首先,尽管没有发现对我们的主要结果关系协调有显著影响,但我们的CP显著改善了几个团队投入、团队流程(团队创新氛围)和团队产出(组织护理水平、能力水平)指标。其次,我们的团队创新氛围的团队过程指标部分中介了CP实施与更好的组织护理水平的团队产出指标之间的关联。总之,CP启动了各种机制,可以改善跨专业团队合作的某些方面,但不是所有方面。关系协调似乎不是增强团队产出的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of care pathway implementation on interprofessional teamwork: An international cluster randomized controlled trial.

This study evaluates whether the implementation of an in-hospital care pathway (CP) improves interprofessional teamwork across countries and tests whether improved communications ("relational coordination") is the mechanism of action. A hospital-based cluster randomized controlled trial in Ireland, Belgium, Italy, and Portugal was performed. Fifty-six interprofessional teams caring for patients admitted with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or for patients with a proximal femur fracture were included and randomly assigned to an intervention group (31 teams and 567 team members), where a CP was implemented, and a control group (25 teams and 417 team members) representing usual care. Multilevel regression and mediation analysis were applied. First, although no significant effect was found on our primary outcome relational coordination, our CP significantly improved several team inputs, team processes (team climate for innovation) and team output (the level of organized care, level of competence) indicators. Second, our team process indicator of team climate for innovation partially mediated the association between CP implementation and team output indicator of better level of organized care. In conclusion, a CP sets in motion various mechanisms that improve some but not all aspects of interprofessional teamwork. Relational coordination does not appear to be the mechanism by which team outputs are enhanced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics and outcomes of communities of practice in allied health educators: rapid review. Interprofessional education stroke workshop: case-based learning for occupational therapy and speech-language pathology students. The impact of healthcare funding on interprofessional collaboration and integrated service delivery in primary and allied healthcare: a scoping review. Co-designing interprofessional education in primary healthcare: an illustration from the Make My Day stroke prevention project. Where is the voice of lived experience in interprofessional education? A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1