一位青年在中学英语课堂上对文学分析话语立场的个案研究

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in the Teaching of English Pub Date : 2021-05-15 DOI:10.58680/rte202131258
S. Fields, Katherine K. Frankel
{"title":"一位青年在中学英语课堂上对文学分析话语立场的个案研究","authors":"S. Fields, Katherine K. Frankel","doi":"10.58680/rte202131258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discourse of literary analysis is dynamic and ideological, shifting as writers navigate conventions and practices to meet their rhetorical purposes in particular contexts. While scholars have engaged ideological analyses of students learning to write literary analysis essays in university contexts, few studies have documented student writers’ experiences of disciplinary enculturation in secondary English language arts classrooms. In this case study, we address this absence by using the concept of stance to examine how the identity of one student—Katarina—informed her interactions with the discourse of literary analysis as it was understood and instantiated by her teacher. In our analysis of essay drafts, field notes, artifacts, and interview transcripts, we found that the convergence of Katarina’s identity as a creative and emotional person and writer with the possibilities for selfhood afforded to her in this context contributed to her stance toward the discourse. We examine points of tension across two of Katarina’s essays that illuminate her ideological struggles as she navigated the discourse of her classroom. Our findings point to the utility of stance as a conceptual tool for researchers and educators to take a critical perspective on students’ writing processes in the context of the ideologically laden, authoritative demands of secondary classrooms.","PeriodicalId":47105,"journal":{"name":"Research in the Teaching of English","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case Study of One Youth’s Stance toward the Discourse of Literary Analysis in a Secondary English Classroom \",\"authors\":\"S. Fields, Katherine K. Frankel\",\"doi\":\"10.58680/rte202131258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The discourse of literary analysis is dynamic and ideological, shifting as writers navigate conventions and practices to meet their rhetorical purposes in particular contexts. While scholars have engaged ideological analyses of students learning to write literary analysis essays in university contexts, few studies have documented student writers’ experiences of disciplinary enculturation in secondary English language arts classrooms. In this case study, we address this absence by using the concept of stance to examine how the identity of one student—Katarina—informed her interactions with the discourse of literary analysis as it was understood and instantiated by her teacher. In our analysis of essay drafts, field notes, artifacts, and interview transcripts, we found that the convergence of Katarina’s identity as a creative and emotional person and writer with the possibilities for selfhood afforded to her in this context contributed to her stance toward the discourse. We examine points of tension across two of Katarina’s essays that illuminate her ideological struggles as she navigated the discourse of her classroom. Our findings point to the utility of stance as a conceptual tool for researchers and educators to take a critical perspective on students’ writing processes in the context of the ideologically laden, authoritative demands of secondary classrooms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in the Teaching of English\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in the Teaching of English\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202131258\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in the Teaching of English","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202131258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

文学分析的话语是动态的和意识形态的,随着作家在特定语境中驾驭惯例和实践以满足他们的修辞目的而发生变化。虽然学者们对学生在大学环境中学习撰写文学分析文章进行了意识形态分析,但很少有研究记录学生作家在中学英语语言艺术课堂上的学科融入经历。在这个案例研究中,我们通过使用立场的概念来研究一个学生Katarina的身份如何影响她与文学分析话语的互动,因为她的老师理解并实例化了文学分析话语。在我们对论文草稿、现场笔记、人工制品和采访记录的分析中,我们发现卡塔琳娜作为一个有创造力和情感的人和作家的身份与在这种背景下赋予她的自我可能性的融合,有助于她对话语的立场。我们研究了卡塔琳娜的两篇文章中的紧张点,这两篇文章阐述了她在课堂话语中的意识形态斗争。我们的研究结果表明,立场作为一种概念工具,对于研究人员和教育工作者来说是有用的,可以在中学课堂充满意识形态、权威性要求的背景下,对学生的写作过程进行批判性的审视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Case Study of One Youth’s Stance toward the Discourse of Literary Analysis in a Secondary English Classroom 
The discourse of literary analysis is dynamic and ideological, shifting as writers navigate conventions and practices to meet their rhetorical purposes in particular contexts. While scholars have engaged ideological analyses of students learning to write literary analysis essays in university contexts, few studies have documented student writers’ experiences of disciplinary enculturation in secondary English language arts classrooms. In this case study, we address this absence by using the concept of stance to examine how the identity of one student—Katarina—informed her interactions with the discourse of literary analysis as it was understood and instantiated by her teacher. In our analysis of essay drafts, field notes, artifacts, and interview transcripts, we found that the convergence of Katarina’s identity as a creative and emotional person and writer with the possibilities for selfhood afforded to her in this context contributed to her stance toward the discourse. We examine points of tension across two of Katarina’s essays that illuminate her ideological struggles as she navigated the discourse of her classroom. Our findings point to the utility of stance as a conceptual tool for researchers and educators to take a critical perspective on students’ writing processes in the context of the ideologically laden, authoritative demands of secondary classrooms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in the Teaching of English
Research in the Teaching of English EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Research in the Teaching of English (RTE) is a broad-based, multidisciplinary journal composed of original research articles and short scholarly essays on a wide range of topics significant to those concerned with the teaching and learning of languages and literacies around the world, both in and beyond schools and universities.
期刊最新文献
Opening Up Research on the Teaching of Reading by Looking beyond US Borders: What We Might Learn from Early Literacy Instruction in China Literacy Research, Systems Thinking, and Climate Change A Brave New World Requires Courage: New Directions for Literacy Research and Teaching Literacy Research and Its Relationship with Policy: What and Who Informs Policy and Why Is Some Research Ignored? Curriculum-as-Assemblage: Transgressive (Re)Imaginings in English and Literacies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1