职业人士自主学习动机驱动因素:验证性因素模型

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning Pub Date : 2023-05-16 DOI:10.1108/heswbl-04-2023-0085
H. Baber, V. Deepa, Hamzah Elrehail, M. Poulin, F. Mir
{"title":"职业人士自主学习动机驱动因素:验证性因素模型","authors":"H. Baber, V. Deepa, Hamzah Elrehail, M. Poulin, F. Mir","doi":"10.1108/heswbl-04-2023-0085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeAs learning at the workplace is predominantly self-motivated, this study is aimed to identify and categorize the motivational drivers for working professionals to pursue self-directed learning (SDL) at the workplace.Design/methodology/approachA total of 23 variables were identified as drivers for working professionals to initiate, pursue and sustain self-directed learning at the workplace through literature review, interviews and focused group discussions with senior leaders from the industry. The participants were a mix of senior professionals responsible for leading large teams in their organizations and those appointed as people development leaders in their respective organizations. A questionnaire was developed based on the identified drivers and administered online. Around 315 working professionals were surveyed. Structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) methods were used to verify the scale and assess its validity and reliability.FindingsThe results suggested that SDL motivational drivers for working professionals can be categorized into two broad categories, namely extrinsic (14 drivers) and intrinsic (9 drivers). Further, extrinsic drivers were subdivided into three categories: job expectations (6 drivers), negative consequence (2 drivers) and positive reinforcement (6 drivers) based on the initial exploratory and subsequent confirmatory analysis. The results suggest that job expectations and positive reinforcement positively influence the intrinsic motivation of an individual to pursue SDL and negative consequences negatively impact the intrinsic motivation.Practical implicationsThe findings from the study will be useful for human resource practitioners, managers and e-Learning companies to draw strategies for building an SDL culture. It also supports the advancement of research in adult education and learning in the workplace.Originality/valueA new scale to measure motivation for SDL by employees at the workplace is proposed. There are no scales available to measure employee motivation for pursuing SDL at the workplace to the best of our knowledge.","PeriodicalId":45549,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-directed learning motivational drivers of working professionals: confirmatory factor models\",\"authors\":\"H. Baber, V. Deepa, Hamzah Elrehail, M. Poulin, F. Mir\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/heswbl-04-2023-0085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeAs learning at the workplace is predominantly self-motivated, this study is aimed to identify and categorize the motivational drivers for working professionals to pursue self-directed learning (SDL) at the workplace.Design/methodology/approachA total of 23 variables were identified as drivers for working professionals to initiate, pursue and sustain self-directed learning at the workplace through literature review, interviews and focused group discussions with senior leaders from the industry. The participants were a mix of senior professionals responsible for leading large teams in their organizations and those appointed as people development leaders in their respective organizations. A questionnaire was developed based on the identified drivers and administered online. Around 315 working professionals were surveyed. Structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) methods were used to verify the scale and assess its validity and reliability.FindingsThe results suggested that SDL motivational drivers for working professionals can be categorized into two broad categories, namely extrinsic (14 drivers) and intrinsic (9 drivers). Further, extrinsic drivers were subdivided into three categories: job expectations (6 drivers), negative consequence (2 drivers) and positive reinforcement (6 drivers) based on the initial exploratory and subsequent confirmatory analysis. The results suggest that job expectations and positive reinforcement positively influence the intrinsic motivation of an individual to pursue SDL and negative consequences negatively impact the intrinsic motivation.Practical implicationsThe findings from the study will be useful for human resource practitioners, managers and e-Learning companies to draw strategies for building an SDL culture. It also supports the advancement of research in adult education and learning in the workplace.Originality/valueA new scale to measure motivation for SDL by employees at the workplace is proposed. There are no scales available to measure employee motivation for pursuing SDL at the workplace to the best of our knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-04-2023-0085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-04-2023-0085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:在工作场所学习以自我激励为主的背景下,本研究旨在识别和分类职业人士在工作场所进行自我导向学习的动机驱动因素。设计/方法/途径通过文献综述、访谈和与行业高层领导的焦点小组讨论,共有23个变量被确定为在职专业人士在工作场所发起、追求和维持自主学习的驱动因素。参与者是负责领导其组织中的大型团队的高级专业人员和在其各自组织中被任命为人员发展领导者的人员的混合体。根据确定的驱动因素制定了一份调查问卷,并在网上进行管理。约315名在职专业人士接受了调查。采用结构方程模型和验证性因子分析(CFA)方法对量表进行验证,评估量表的效度和信度。结果表明,工作专业人员的SDL动机驱动因素可分为两大类,即外在(14个驱动因素)和内在(9个驱动因素)。基于初步的探索性分析和后续的验证性分析,将外在驱动因素细分为工作期望(6个驱动因素)、消极后果(2个驱动因素)和积极强化(6个驱动因素)三类。结果表明,工作期望和正强化正向影响个体追求SDL的内在动机,消极后果负向影响个体追求SDL的内在动机。实际意义研究结果将有助于人力资源从业者、管理人员和电子学习公司制定构建SDL文化的策略。它还支持成人教育和工作场所学习方面的研究进展。原创性/价值提出了一个衡量员工在工作场所SDL动机的新量表。据我们所知,目前还没有可用的量表来衡量员工在工作场所追求SDL的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self-directed learning motivational drivers of working professionals: confirmatory factor models
PurposeAs learning at the workplace is predominantly self-motivated, this study is aimed to identify and categorize the motivational drivers for working professionals to pursue self-directed learning (SDL) at the workplace.Design/methodology/approachA total of 23 variables were identified as drivers for working professionals to initiate, pursue and sustain self-directed learning at the workplace through literature review, interviews and focused group discussions with senior leaders from the industry. The participants were a mix of senior professionals responsible for leading large teams in their organizations and those appointed as people development leaders in their respective organizations. A questionnaire was developed based on the identified drivers and administered online. Around 315 working professionals were surveyed. Structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) methods were used to verify the scale and assess its validity and reliability.FindingsThe results suggested that SDL motivational drivers for working professionals can be categorized into two broad categories, namely extrinsic (14 drivers) and intrinsic (9 drivers). Further, extrinsic drivers were subdivided into three categories: job expectations (6 drivers), negative consequence (2 drivers) and positive reinforcement (6 drivers) based on the initial exploratory and subsequent confirmatory analysis. The results suggest that job expectations and positive reinforcement positively influence the intrinsic motivation of an individual to pursue SDL and negative consequences negatively impact the intrinsic motivation.Practical implicationsThe findings from the study will be useful for human resource practitioners, managers and e-Learning companies to draw strategies for building an SDL culture. It also supports the advancement of research in adult education and learning in the workplace.Originality/valueA new scale to measure motivation for SDL by employees at the workplace is proposed. There are no scales available to measure employee motivation for pursuing SDL at the workplace to the best of our knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning
Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
How entrepreneurial environment and education influence university students' entrepreneurial intentions: the mediating role of entrepreneurial motivation Graduate employability skills of business students: the moderating role of reflective practices Benefits of a short course on mental health well-being and resilience for healthcare workers in South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic Co-designing doctoral programs to enhance postgraduate students' employability: insights from industry stakeholders Higher education student engagement with online learning: the role of perceived value and academic entitlement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1