使用模糊认知映射分析公共医疗保健部门的道德实践

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1002/mcda.1729
Joana A. T. Abrantes, Fernando A. F. Ferreira, Constantin Zopounidis, Leandro F. Pereira, Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė
{"title":"使用模糊认知映射分析公共医疗保健部门的道德实践","authors":"Joana A. T. Abrantes,&nbsp;Fernando A. F. Ferreira,&nbsp;Constantin Zopounidis,&nbsp;Leandro F. Pereira,&nbsp;Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study focused on some of the most important aspects of ethics in the healthcare industry and examined the relevance of the system created to evaluate ethical healthcare practices in the public sector. The research included developing a conceptual model representing variables that influence ethics in public healthcare services in Portugal, using fuzzy cognitive mapping to facilitate the identification of the most significant variables. This method is a well-established decision problem-structuring tool that allows experts to define cause-and-effect relationships between variables and make decisions. The insights obtained were generated in face-to-face group meetings with experts in the public healthcare sector, showing that <i>professional profiles</i>, <i>management</i>, <i>team relationships</i>, <i>external factors</i>, <i>equity principles</i>, and <i>respect</i> are among the most relevant determinants of ethical healthcare. That is, these criteria are the most commonly applied standards in analyses of ethical practices in public healthcare services. The resulting assessment framework and its applicability were validated by both the panel of experts and the chairperson of the board of directors of S. Francisco Xavier Hospital in Lisbon, Portugal. The advantages and limitations of the analysis developed in this study are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","volume":"29 1-2","pages":"67-79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mcda.1729","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing ethical practices in the public healthcare sector using fuzzy cognitive mapping\",\"authors\":\"Joana A. T. Abrantes,&nbsp;Fernando A. F. Ferreira,&nbsp;Constantin Zopounidis,&nbsp;Leandro F. Pereira,&nbsp;Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mcda.1729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study focused on some of the most important aspects of ethics in the healthcare industry and examined the relevance of the system created to evaluate ethical healthcare practices in the public sector. The research included developing a conceptual model representing variables that influence ethics in public healthcare services in Portugal, using fuzzy cognitive mapping to facilitate the identification of the most significant variables. This method is a well-established decision problem-structuring tool that allows experts to define cause-and-effect relationships between variables and make decisions. The insights obtained were generated in face-to-face group meetings with experts in the public healthcare sector, showing that <i>professional profiles</i>, <i>management</i>, <i>team relationships</i>, <i>external factors</i>, <i>equity principles</i>, and <i>respect</i> are among the most relevant determinants of ethical healthcare. That is, these criteria are the most commonly applied standards in analyses of ethical practices in public healthcare services. The resulting assessment framework and its applicability were validated by both the panel of experts and the chairperson of the board of directors of S. Francisco Xavier Hospital in Lisbon, Portugal. The advantages and limitations of the analysis developed in this study are also discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis\",\"volume\":\"29 1-2\",\"pages\":\"67-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mcda.1729\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.1729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.1729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究的重点是医疗保健行业道德的一些最重要的方面,并检查了创建的系统的相关性,以评估公共部门的道德医疗保健实践。该研究包括开发一个概念模型,代表影响葡萄牙公共医疗保健服务伦理的变量,使用模糊认知映射来促进最重要变量的识别。该方法是一种完善的决策问题结构工具,允许专家定义变量之间的因果关系并做出决策。在与公共医疗保健部门的专家面对面的小组会议中获得的见解表明,专业概况、管理、团队关系、外部因素、公平原则和尊重是道德医疗保健的最相关决定因素。也就是说,这些标准是在公共医疗保健服务的道德实践分析中最常用的标准。由此产生的评估框架及其适用性得到了专家小组和葡萄牙里斯本圣弗朗西斯科泽维尔医院董事会主席的验证。本文还讨论了该分析方法的优点和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyzing ethical practices in the public healthcare sector using fuzzy cognitive mapping

This study focused on some of the most important aspects of ethics in the healthcare industry and examined the relevance of the system created to evaluate ethical healthcare practices in the public sector. The research included developing a conceptual model representing variables that influence ethics in public healthcare services in Portugal, using fuzzy cognitive mapping to facilitate the identification of the most significant variables. This method is a well-established decision problem-structuring tool that allows experts to define cause-and-effect relationships between variables and make decisions. The insights obtained were generated in face-to-face group meetings with experts in the public healthcare sector, showing that professional profiles, management, team relationships, external factors, equity principles, and respect are among the most relevant determinants of ethical healthcare. That is, these criteria are the most commonly applied standards in analyses of ethical practices in public healthcare services. The resulting assessment framework and its applicability were validated by both the panel of experts and the chairperson of the board of directors of S. Francisco Xavier Hospital in Lisbon, Portugal. The advantages and limitations of the analysis developed in this study are also discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis was launched in 1992, and from the outset has aimed to be the repository of choice for papers covering all aspects of MCDA/MCDM. The journal provides an international forum for the presentation and discussion of all aspects of research, application and evaluation of multi-criteria decision analysis, and publishes material from a variety of disciplines and all schools of thought. Papers addressing mathematical, theoretical, and behavioural aspects are welcome, as are case studies, applications and evaluation of techniques and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A Bibliometric Exploration of Multiple Criteria Decision Aid and Clustering—A Conceptual Taxonomy Monitoring Sustainable Development Goals: Stepwise Benchmarking Approach Charting the evolutionary conceptual pathway of analytic network process research: A main path analysis Socio-economic strategy for settlement of refugees amidst crisis: The case of Pak-Afghan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1