现代母亲身份与女性双重身份:重写性契约。Petra Bueskens,纽约:Routledge,2018(ISBN 978-1-138-67742-5)

IF 1 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Hypatia-A Journal of Feminist Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-08-16 DOI:10.1017/hyp.2022.29
M. Walsh
{"title":"现代母亲身份与女性双重身份:重写性契约。Petra Bueskens,纽约:Routledge,2018(ISBN 978-1-138-67742-5)","authors":"M. Walsh","doi":"10.1017/hyp.2022.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 – 2022 highlights, once again, the many preexisting inequalities and sources of oppression cutting across and throughout our societies. Petra Bueskens ’ s Modern Motherhood and Women ’ s Dual Identities: Rewriting the Sexual Contract examines the foundations and manifestations of one of these fractures, that is, the continued oppression of women. Although written before the global pandemic, Bueskens ’ s analysis helps us to understand both the theoretical and structural roots of women ’ s oppression in modern societies and in doing so sheds light on why the pandemic hit women so hard. So hard that UN Women concluded in 2020 that “ while everyone is facing unprecedented challenges, women are bearing the brunt of the economic and social fallout of COVID-19 ” (UN Women 2020). Moreover, Bueskens claims to offer insight into one possible pathway for disrupting this continuing oppression and for rewriting the sexual contract that underwrites that oppression. Bueskens traces the theoretical and structural roots of women ’ s oppression in modern society to a “ conundrum of duality ” (91). It is through this duality that liberalism and capitalism promise women freedom while capturing them in gender roles and institutions enforcing those roles and their continued subordination. In Bueskens ’ s words, this conundrum produced conditions in which “ women ’ s freedom as individuals simultaneously produced their constraints as mothers and wives ” (91). In this way, Bueskens returns us to the rallying cry of the second wave of feminist activists and theorists: “ the personal is political. ” She demonstrates the essential relevance of this assertion for understanding women ’ s oppression today and also points to the immense unfinished work that remains if women ’ s oppression is to be, or can be, addressed within liberal or capitalist societies. Bueskens focuses on Carole Pateman","PeriodicalId":47921,"journal":{"name":"Hypatia-A Journal of Feminist Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern Motherhood and Women's Dual Identities: Rewriting the Sexual Contract. Petra Bueskens, New York: Routledge, 2018 (ISBN 978-1-138-67742-5)\",\"authors\":\"M. Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/hyp.2022.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 – 2022 highlights, once again, the many preexisting inequalities and sources of oppression cutting across and throughout our societies. Petra Bueskens ’ s Modern Motherhood and Women ’ s Dual Identities: Rewriting the Sexual Contract examines the foundations and manifestations of one of these fractures, that is, the continued oppression of women. Although written before the global pandemic, Bueskens ’ s analysis helps us to understand both the theoretical and structural roots of women ’ s oppression in modern societies and in doing so sheds light on why the pandemic hit women so hard. So hard that UN Women concluded in 2020 that “ while everyone is facing unprecedented challenges, women are bearing the brunt of the economic and social fallout of COVID-19 ” (UN Women 2020). Moreover, Bueskens claims to offer insight into one possible pathway for disrupting this continuing oppression and for rewriting the sexual contract that underwrites that oppression. Bueskens traces the theoretical and structural roots of women ’ s oppression in modern society to a “ conundrum of duality ” (91). It is through this duality that liberalism and capitalism promise women freedom while capturing them in gender roles and institutions enforcing those roles and their continued subordination. In Bueskens ’ s words, this conundrum produced conditions in which “ women ’ s freedom as individuals simultaneously produced their constraints as mothers and wives ” (91). In this way, Bueskens returns us to the rallying cry of the second wave of feminist activists and theorists: “ the personal is political. ” She demonstrates the essential relevance of this assertion for understanding women ’ s oppression today and also points to the immense unfinished work that remains if women ’ s oppression is to be, or can be, addressed within liberal or capitalist societies. Bueskens focuses on Carole Pateman\",\"PeriodicalId\":47921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypatia-A Journal of Feminist Philosophy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypatia-A Journal of Feminist Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2022.29\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypatia-A Journal of Feminist Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2022.29","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年至2022年的新冠肺炎疫情再次凸显了我们社会中存在的许多不平等和压迫源。Petra Bueskens的《现代母性与女性的双重身份:重写性契约》探讨了其中一种断裂的基础和表现,即对女性的持续压迫。尽管布肯斯的分析是在全球疫情之前写的,但它有助于我们理解现代社会中女性受压迫的理论和结构根源,并揭示了疫情对女性打击如此之大的原因。妇女署在2020年得出的结论是,“尽管每个人都面临着前所未有的挑战,但妇女在新冠肺炎的经济和社会影响中首当其冲”(妇女署2020)。此外,Bueskens声称提供了一种可能的途径,可以打破这种持续的压迫,并改写支持这种压迫的性契约。Bueskens将现代社会中女性受压迫的理论和结构根源追溯到“二元性难题”(91)。正是通过这种二元性,自由主义和资本主义承诺女性自由,同时将她们纳入性别角色和强制执行这些角色的机构以及她们的持续从属地位。用布埃肯斯的话来说,这个难题产生了“女性作为个体的自由同时产生了她们作为母亲和妻子的约束”的条件(91)。通过这种方式,Bueskens让我们回到了第二波女权主义活动家和理论家的口号:“个人就是政治。”,在自由主义或资本主义社会中处理。Bueskens关注Carole Pateman
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modern Motherhood and Women's Dual Identities: Rewriting the Sexual Contract. Petra Bueskens, New York: Routledge, 2018 (ISBN 978-1-138-67742-5)
The COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 – 2022 highlights, once again, the many preexisting inequalities and sources of oppression cutting across and throughout our societies. Petra Bueskens ’ s Modern Motherhood and Women ’ s Dual Identities: Rewriting the Sexual Contract examines the foundations and manifestations of one of these fractures, that is, the continued oppression of women. Although written before the global pandemic, Bueskens ’ s analysis helps us to understand both the theoretical and structural roots of women ’ s oppression in modern societies and in doing so sheds light on why the pandemic hit women so hard. So hard that UN Women concluded in 2020 that “ while everyone is facing unprecedented challenges, women are bearing the brunt of the economic and social fallout of COVID-19 ” (UN Women 2020). Moreover, Bueskens claims to offer insight into one possible pathway for disrupting this continuing oppression and for rewriting the sexual contract that underwrites that oppression. Bueskens traces the theoretical and structural roots of women ’ s oppression in modern society to a “ conundrum of duality ” (91). It is through this duality that liberalism and capitalism promise women freedom while capturing them in gender roles and institutions enforcing those roles and their continued subordination. In Bueskens ’ s words, this conundrum produced conditions in which “ women ’ s freedom as individuals simultaneously produced their constraints as mothers and wives ” (91). In this way, Bueskens returns us to the rallying cry of the second wave of feminist activists and theorists: “ the personal is political. ” She demonstrates the essential relevance of this assertion for understanding women ’ s oppression today and also points to the immense unfinished work that remains if women ’ s oppression is to be, or can be, addressed within liberal or capitalist societies. Bueskens focuses on Carole Pateman
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
“My Soul Hurt, and I Felt as If I Was Going to Die”: Obstetric Violence as Torture “Obstetric Violence,” “Mistreatment,” and “Disrespect and Abuse”: Reflections on the Politics of Naming Violations During Facility-Based Childbirth Animating the Affect–Care–Labor Link in the Wake of “The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill”: Care Ethics and Policymaking on Indian Surrogacy Thinking through Vulnerability Me, Not You: The Trouble with Mainstream Feminism. Alison Phipps. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2020 (ISBN: 978-1526147172)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1