标准和标准化实践:组织规模重要吗?

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Engineering Management Journal Pub Date : 2021-03-24 DOI:10.1080/10429247.2021.1894060
Ana Rakić, Isidora Milošević, J. Filipović
{"title":"标准和标准化实践:组织规模重要吗?","authors":"Ana Rakić, Isidora Milošević, J. Filipović","doi":"10.1080/10429247.2021.1894060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Increments in economic efficiency resulting from the application of standards generate economic benefits for both producers and consumers. As a result, it is of the utmost importance for organizations to be aware of the benefits that standards bring to their operations. This paper deals with specific categories of standardization effects that organizations can achieve in the processes of formal standardization. The goal was to rank organizations by size, based on the effects that they can gain by getting involved in formal standardization. The data gathered from a survey of experts from the Institute for Standardization of Serbia form the basis of our multicriteria analysis of standardization indicators for micro, small, medium-sized, and large organizations. The final ranking for determining the achievement of standardization effects in different-sized organizations was performed using the PROMETHEE-GAIA method. Our analysis showed that micro organizations were the best performers since they are more flexible than the other size categories of organizations. In contrast, the other types of organizations have lower significant preferences concerning all the criteria. Finally, one of the conclusions is that all observed organizations have the potential to achieve the effects of standardization, although they may differ.","PeriodicalId":54353,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Management Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"291 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10429247.2021.1894060","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standards and Standardization Practices: Does Organization Size Matter?\",\"authors\":\"Ana Rakić, Isidora Milošević, J. Filipović\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10429247.2021.1894060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Increments in economic efficiency resulting from the application of standards generate economic benefits for both producers and consumers. As a result, it is of the utmost importance for organizations to be aware of the benefits that standards bring to their operations. This paper deals with specific categories of standardization effects that organizations can achieve in the processes of formal standardization. The goal was to rank organizations by size, based on the effects that they can gain by getting involved in formal standardization. The data gathered from a survey of experts from the Institute for Standardization of Serbia form the basis of our multicriteria analysis of standardization indicators for micro, small, medium-sized, and large organizations. The final ranking for determining the achievement of standardization effects in different-sized organizations was performed using the PROMETHEE-GAIA method. Our analysis showed that micro organizations were the best performers since they are more flexible than the other size categories of organizations. In contrast, the other types of organizations have lower significant preferences concerning all the criteria. Finally, one of the conclusions is that all observed organizations have the potential to achieve the effects of standardization, although they may differ.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"291 - 301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10429247.2021.1894060\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2021.1894060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2021.1894060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

标准的应用所带来的经济效率的提高为生产者和消费者都带来了经济效益。因此,对于组织来说,意识到标准给他们的操作带来的好处是非常重要的。本文讨论了组织在形式标准化过程中所能达到的标准化效果的具体类别。目标是根据组织的规模,根据他们通过参与正式标准化所能获得的效果,对组织进行排名。从塞尔维亚标准化研究所的专家调查中收集的数据构成了我们对微型、小型、中型和大型组织的标准化指标进行多标准分析的基础。使用promehee - gaia方法对确定不同规模组织的标准化效果实现情况进行最终排序。我们的分析表明,微型组织表现最好,因为它们比其他规模的组织更灵活。相比之下,其他类型的组织对所有标准的显著偏好较低。最后,结论之一是,所有观察到的组织都有实现标准化效果的潜力,尽管它们可能有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standards and Standardization Practices: Does Organization Size Matter?
Abstract Increments in economic efficiency resulting from the application of standards generate economic benefits for both producers and consumers. As a result, it is of the utmost importance for organizations to be aware of the benefits that standards bring to their operations. This paper deals with specific categories of standardization effects that organizations can achieve in the processes of formal standardization. The goal was to rank organizations by size, based on the effects that they can gain by getting involved in formal standardization. The data gathered from a survey of experts from the Institute for Standardization of Serbia form the basis of our multicriteria analysis of standardization indicators for micro, small, medium-sized, and large organizations. The final ranking for determining the achievement of standardization effects in different-sized organizations was performed using the PROMETHEE-GAIA method. Our analysis showed that micro organizations were the best performers since they are more flexible than the other size categories of organizations. In contrast, the other types of organizations have lower significant preferences concerning all the criteria. Finally, one of the conclusions is that all observed organizations have the potential to achieve the effects of standardization, although they may differ.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Management Journal
Engineering Management Journal 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: EMJ is designed to provide practical, pertinent knowledge on the management of technology, technical professionals, and technical organizations. EMJ strives to provide value to the practice of engineering management and engineering managers. EMJ is an archival journal that facilitates both practitioners and university faculty in publishing useful articles. The primary focus is on articles that improve the practice of engineering management. To support the practice of engineering management, EMJ publishes papers within key engineering management content areas. EMJ Editors will continue to refine these areas to ensure they are aligned with the challenges faced by technical organizations and technical managers.
期刊最新文献
Lean Office: Proposition and Application of a Process-Mapping Method Based on the Shingo Production Mechanism (SPM) Managing Stakeholder Pressure for Megaproject Success and Green Innovation: The Key Role of Social Responsibility Engineering Management Education: Washington Accord Accreditation Programs The New PAD: A Method to Implement the Lean Construction Principles A Risk Minimization Model for a Multi-Skilled, Multi-Mode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with Discrete Time-Cost-Quality-Risk Trade-Off
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1