中国冲突解决的智慧流派及其与当代公共治理的相关性:一个偶然的框架

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Journal of Conflict and Violence Pub Date : 2018-07-23 DOI:10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.631
Lihua Yang
{"title":"中国冲突解决的智慧流派及其与当代公共治理的相关性:一个偶然的框架","authors":"Lihua Yang","doi":"10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature concerning conflict resolution in public governance largely ignores comparative cross-cultural settings. This study investigates Chinese schools of thought on conflict resolution and their relevance to contemporary public governance. Based on a review of the literature and a cross-cultural approach examining Chinese thought and experience, the study describes the different philosophies, methods, and principles of conflict resolution in China. It shows that eight major Chinese schools of thought comprise a continuum of methods (in terms of force vs. peace) and form a contingent framework for Chinese conflict resolution. The findings are of great relevance for contemporary public governance and provide new openings for improving conflict resolution methods.","PeriodicalId":45781,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict and Violence","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.631","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chinese Schools of Wisdom on Conflict Resolution and Their Relevance to Contemporary Public Governance: A Contingent Framework\",\"authors\":\"Lihua Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The literature concerning conflict resolution in public governance largely ignores comparative cross-cultural settings. This study investigates Chinese schools of thought on conflict resolution and their relevance to contemporary public governance. Based on a review of the literature and a cross-cultural approach examining Chinese thought and experience, the study describes the different philosophies, methods, and principles of conflict resolution in China. It shows that eight major Chinese schools of thought comprise a continuum of methods (in terms of force vs. peace) and form a contingent framework for Chinese conflict resolution. The findings are of great relevance for contemporary public governance and provide new openings for improving conflict resolution methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Conflict and Violence\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.631\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Conflict and Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.631\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict and Violence","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关于公共治理中冲突解决的文献在很大程度上忽略了比较跨文化背景。本研究考察了中国冲突解决思想流派及其与当代公共治理的相关性。本研究在回顾文献的基础上,运用跨文化方法考察中国的思想和经验,描述了中国解决冲突的不同哲学、方法和原则。它表明,中国的八大思想流派包含了连续的方法(在武力与和平方面),并形成了中国解决冲突的偶然框架。研究结果对当代公共治理具有重要意义,并为改进冲突解决方法提供了新的突破口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chinese Schools of Wisdom on Conflict Resolution and Their Relevance to Contemporary Public Governance: A Contingent Framework
The literature concerning conflict resolution in public governance largely ignores comparative cross-cultural settings. This study investigates Chinese schools of thought on conflict resolution and their relevance to contemporary public governance. Based on a review of the literature and a cross-cultural approach examining Chinese thought and experience, the study describes the different philosophies, methods, and principles of conflict resolution in China. It shows that eight major Chinese schools of thought comprise a continuum of methods (in terms of force vs. peace) and form a contingent framework for Chinese conflict resolution. The findings are of great relevance for contemporary public governance and provide new openings for improving conflict resolution methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Identity, Significance, Sensation or Justice? Different Motives which Attract to Radical Ideas Social Worldviews and Personal Beliefs as Risk Factors for Radicalization: A Comparison Between Muslims and non-Muslims Living in Poland Change in Juvenile Offending Versatility Predicted by Individual, Familial, and Environmental Risks Justice Sensitivity Is Positively and Negatively Related to Prejudice and Discrimination College Women’s Experience of Verbal Sexual Coercion and Responses to a Sexual Assault Vignette
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1